30.05.2014 Views

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

een almost obsolete; for soon after 100 Justus can venture an attack to which <strong>Josephus</strong><br />

basically can have no rejoinder, factually speaking; therefore he places the argument on a<br />

personal level. Of course he liked to dwell on [the fact] that this same Justus, who claimed to<br />

have a monopoly on Greek education, acted as the conveyor of pure <strong>Jewish</strong> tradition, and he<br />

liked to stress his own Judaism time and again in contrast to him; only he forgot in the process<br />

that Justus, who had learned his Greek in his youth, had always remained true to his people,<br />

whereas he, who had acquired a Greek education only late, had broken off his association with<br />

the <strong>Jewish</strong> priesthood since he was living in Rome as officiosus and later as Epaphroditus’ man<br />

of letters. And all reference to schools etc. was of no help when it was pointed out to him that<br />

his work was not based on the Hebrew Bible, as the Jews now demanded.<br />

Epaphroditus, the publisher of the Antiquities, required [274] an account. <strong>Josephus</strong><br />

assails him over and over again, he tries to prove his ability to discredit Justus politically and<br />

literarily; and yet we can say historically that it was the latter who was right; the future<br />

belonged to <strong>Jewish</strong> orthodoxy, to the Hebrew Bible, not to the LXX, not to Hellenistic Judaism,<br />

not to the Antiquities. <strong>Josephus</strong>, who was around 70 years old, sees the catastrophe overtaking<br />

him; if Epaphroditus now shakes him off on grounds of Justus’ attacks, [and if] he deems the<br />

Antiquities as something worthless like [Justus does], then the last things remaining to<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong>, [namely] literary fame, or more, his [very] literary existence, are taken [from him];<br />

because his major venture of the Antiquities was a failure, it was not the book documenting<br />

Judaism [Urkundenbuch des Judentums] that it was intended to be, and should have been. And<br />

yet, the versatile [<strong>Josephus</strong>] still had one last resort remaining [to him]: granted the LXX was<br />

henceforth rejected as a book of the Jews, but in part [it was] rejected precisely because the<br />

Christians have turned it into their holy [own] book. <strong>The</strong> time was no longer to be far off when<br />

Jews and Christians quarrelled with regard to the LXX; the Antiquities was not lost if it<br />

were to be transferred over to Christianity. Just like the LXX was to be preserved only<br />

through, and in conjunction with, the New Testament, which presupposes it everywhere, [so]<br />

<strong>Josephus</strong> could save his Antiquities from oblivion only by supplying it to the Christians. Pangs<br />

of conscience did not exist for <strong>Josephus</strong>; he had betrayed his people long ago after he had<br />

deceived his government; he viewed Agrippa one minute as his patron, the next minute as his<br />

ferocious enemy; John of Gischala was a villain to him one minute and the next, a hero; today<br />

he cursed what he had worshipped yesterday if only his own interests were thus served. No<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!