The Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus: A Biographical Investigation

added segments illustrates best what I mean here as well!
When Josephus returns from Rome he attempts to bring the rebels to their senses in
that he pointed out to them Rome’s power and good luck; they should not frivolously provoke
[such] formidable danger. “I emphasized this” – so he continues – “because I foresaw that the
end of the war would be disastrous for us”(19). Here Josephus quite manifestly has the matter
itself clearly in mind even though he does not use the expression ‘the Jewish War’; he senses
that this is the eve of the war that was to bring about the downfall of the Jews – but section 19
belongs to the introduction that continues until section 27, which originated after the year
100. This also explains section 24 where Josephus likewise has the war clearly in mind when he
writes the phrase, “Cestius’ defeat became a disaster for our whole people”.
In section 32 ff. concerning Justus, Josephus is also aware of the concept of the Jewish-
Roman War when he explains that the Tiberians were split into three factions, of which one
was for [remaining] loyal to Rome, while the second was decided upon war, and the third only
pretended to have misgivings about the war. This part [of the text], however, did not emerge
until after the year 100 (cf. page 37 ff.).
[101] Likewise, there is an addition in section 100 (cf. page 87 ff.); here Josephus expresses the
expectation that the Romans would be pleased if the Jews were to mangle themselves within a
mutual στάσεις; therefore Josephus attempts to calm all strife. Thus he evidently has the
feeling here that the Romans were the common foe of all Jews, who must therefore stand
together harmoniously in order to overcome their powerful foe. Without a doubt, the idea of
“the War” is present in this addition as well.
The same holds for section 177. Here Josephus is working with the concept πρὸ τοῦ
πολέμου, thereby thinking again of the great Jewish-Roman War which had begun before his
arrival from Jerusalem. This section 177, however, because [it is a] segment concerning Justus,
has also already proven to be an addition on page 48 ff. above; according to the evidence
produced there, this [addition] extended to section 188; so the latter passage also ceases to
apply to the administrative report. In this [passage] we distinctly sense that Josephus is
thinking likewise of the Jewish War in the form that is familiar to us when he describes the
extensive construction of the fortifications, 34 the stockpiling of provisions etc., which he has
34 Since we here have a segment added from the time after 100, Josephus lists Tarichea first and
then Tiberias. This agrees with the later segments Life 144 and 156 but does contradict the view
90