04.11.2012 Views

New build - GWG München

New build - GWG München

New build - GWG München

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A typical apartment comprised a living<br />

room (with integrated kitchen) and one<br />

or more bedrooms. The gardens were a<br />

luxury, and they continue to leave a<br />

characteristic mark on the area to this<br />

day. All of the <strong>build</strong>ings were connected<br />

to the electricity, water and sewage networks,<br />

which was unusual for the time.<br />

Despite the minimal standards, model<br />

rooms complete with fine yet functional<br />

furnishings made by “Deutsche Werkstätten<br />

Hellerau” were put on display to<br />

convey standards of quality living. “The<br />

authenticity, intrinsic value, simplicity,<br />

and neat, smart furnishings and household<br />

appliances are what make the<br />

rooms so comfortable and friendly”,<br />

stated a leaflet published by the City<br />

Household Advisory Office in August<br />

1937. Nevertheless, only the rental<br />

apartments were in demand. Not as<br />

many buyers as hoped showed an<br />

interest in the 190 small homes. This<br />

may have been because despite their<br />

modest features, only very few people<br />

were able to afford such houses.<br />

A new start after 1945<br />

Although the estate survived the Second World War without<br />

any damage, its main construction material, light concrete<br />

“Iporit” made from foamed sand by IG Farben, was proving to<br />

be susceptible to moisture. Nevertheless, in 1949, additional<br />

housing was created by converting 48 attics into apartments<br />

of 37.5 square metres each, as a response to the rampant<br />

housing shortage. The amenities were just the same as before.<br />

The residents still lived in apartments of between 36 and<br />

59 square metres, with room heights of around 2,20 metres,<br />

no bathrooms, and simple stoves. The condition of the cheaply<br />

built structures continued to deteriorate and resident numbers<br />

declined accordingly. By the end of the 1950s, the structural<br />

defects were “severe”, but another decade would pass before<br />

the subject of renovation finally came under discussion. This<br />

was partly due to the fact that the low income from rents did<br />

not allow for anything above minimal <strong>build</strong>ing maintenance.<br />

Also, since the end of the war, occupancies were controlled by<br />

the Housing Office of the State Capital of Munich.<br />

By now, the resident structure had changed massively. In<br />

addition to the original occupants, who had developed and<br />

improved their apartments themselves, large numbers of<br />

students began living here, attracted by the low rent and<br />

proximity to the city centre, as well as large families, who<br />

sometimes even rented two apartments to cover their needs.<br />

There were also what Armin Hagen, Head of the Building<br />

Management Department at <strong>GWG</strong> <strong>München</strong>, referred to in<br />

his diploma thesis on the history of the estate as “immigrants,<br />

disadvantaged persons and dropouts“.<br />

In 1980, the city's underground rail network reached Berg<br />

am Laim with two stops: Innsbrucker Ring and Michaelibad.<br />

This development increased the pressure on city planners to<br />

consolidate and renovate the estate. At the end of the 1980s,<br />

the <strong>build</strong>ings were taken out of the social residence category,<br />

allowing <strong>GWG</strong> <strong>München</strong> to exercise greater influence over the<br />

development of the Maikäfer Estate, even though it was now<br />

virtually impossible to organise a “methodical occupancy of<br />

the apartments to raise the standard of the tenant structure<br />

due to their age and facilities.” Substandard apartments<br />

were no longer in demand. Plans were therefore drawn up to<br />

demolish the existing <strong>build</strong>ings and replace individual blocks<br />

so that they complied with modern standards.<br />

The 1980s became the decade of fundamental change. There<br />

was great resistance to the announced reconstruction plans<br />

for the estate, resulting in the formation of the “Tenants’<br />

Association for the Preservation of the Maikäfer Estate” or<br />

MIG. The group organised a number of campaigns in protest<br />

against the impending loss of their homes and neighbourhood.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!