USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

implications of the logistics support strategy for both the initial block and follow-on increments. At each successive increment, a total systems support assessment should be conducted for that block. This introduces the need for assessment and revision of support strategies as a continuing, life-cycle process, with the corresponding need for regular reviews, as outlined below. E.5 FOC supportability reviews assess the adequacy and effectiveness of existing logistics support. They are required at FOC, and periodically thereafter, or when precipitated by changes in requirements/design or performance problems. These post-deployment reviews are held nominally every 3-5 years after IOC or when precipitated by changes in requirements/design and should include: • Review PSI/PSP performance, • Review incorporated product improvements, • Confirm configuration control, and • Modify PBL agreements as needed based on changing warfighter requirements, system design or effectiveness of the product support/sustainment strategy. E.6 Pre-IOC and FOC Product Support Criteria. The following checklist provides product support assessment questions that may be applicable to IOC or FOC assessments: Version 1: Jan 2006 100 Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment <strong>Handbook</strong>
E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC Evaluation Criteria • Has the LCMP been coordinated with the user community • Have all required logistics resources been procured and delivered to the user Maintenance • What post-production issues have been identified • Have corrective actions or plans been developed to address these issues • What is the schedule for supportability assessments • What is the schedule for post-deployment reviews • Who is responsible for maintaining the maintenance plan • Is the maintenance concept rational and articulate Depot Planning • Has the SORAP been completed and approved • Has a depot maintenance interservice study been completed and are agreements in place, if required • Is the interim depot repair capability trained, equipped, and in place to perform depot maintenance • If depot repair is to be performed commercially, has the contract been awarded • Has the depot manager certified the depot repair capability • Is the repair capability trained, equipped, and in place to perform depot maintenance • Are depot capital improvement projects necessary to support this repair capability completed or on schedule • Do the planning efforts articulate the required timing for establishing a depot capability relative to IOC • Is PPP between the depots, original equipment manufacturers and other PSPs being considered • Are cost estimates for establishing depot capability addressed and included in the product support funding profile Facilities • Are required unit-level MILCON projects complete or on schedule • If MILCON is not complete, what interim facility workarounds have been planned • Have all beddown sites been activated • If beddown sites have not been activated, do the activation plans support the system fielding/deployment on schedule • Are all host tenant support agreements in place Warranty • Does the maintenance plan identify warranty requirements • Have problems with warranty administration at the Organizational and Intermediate levels been identified during early fielding of the system • Have modifications to the warranty program been proposed or implemented to address those problems • What incentives have been offered to the contractor to increase the warranty period Version 1: Jan 2006 101 Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment <strong>Handbook</strong>
Page 1:
Department of the Air Force Guide f
Page 4 and 5:
Version 1 January 2006 Air Force In
Page 6 and 7:
D. EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR MILESTON
Page 8 and 9:
Version 1: January 2006 Air Force I
Page 10 and 11:
and implementation before each acqu
Page 12 and 13:
epresent how a product support stra
Page 14 and 15:
Table 3-1. Sustainment Elements Sus
Page 16 and 17:
Capabilities Documents (ICD, CDD, ,
Page 18 and 19:
assessment process. Each team membe
Page 20 and 21:
Table 5-2. Sustainment Element Rati
Page 22 and 23:
esponsibility for tracking and reso
Page 25 and 26:
A. The Integrated Defense Acquisiti
Page 27 and 28:
Version 1: Jan 2006 19 Air Force In
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
B. Relationship between Reliability
Page 35 and 36:
Figure B-1. Cause and Effect Betwee
Page 37 and 38:
maintenance- and supply-response ti
Page 39:
B-1. RAM Relationships to Sustainme
Page 42 and 43:
Typical Document Request Acquisitio
Page 44 and 45:
C-1. Milestone B Documentation (con
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Typical Document Request Capability
Page 52 and 53:
C-2. Milestone C Documentation (con
Page 55 and 56:
D. Evaluation Criteria for Mileston
Page 57 and 58: D-1. Warfighter Capability Requirem
Page 59 and 60: D-3. Product Support Management The
Page 61 and 62: D-3. Product Support Management (co
Page 63 and 64: D-4. Product Support Budgeting and
Page 65 and 66: D-6. Sustainment Elements of IMP/IM
Page 67 and 68: D-7. Manpower Manpower factors are
Page 69 and 70: D-8. Personnel Personnel factors ar
Page 71 and 72: D-9. Maintenance Acquiring and sust
Page 73 and 74: D-9. Maintenance (continued) Milest
Page 75 and 76: D-9. Maintenance (continued) Evalua
Page 77 and 78: D-10. Supportability Supportability
Page 79 and 80: D-10. Supportability (continued) Ev
Page 81 and 82: D-10. Supportability (continued) Ev
Page 83 and 84: D-11. Systems Engineering (continue
Page 91 and 92: D-12. Data Management Data Manageme
Page 93 and 94: D-12. Data Management (continued) E
Page 95 and 96: D-13. Supply (continued) Evaluation
Page 97 and 98: D-13. Supply (continued) Evaluation
Page 99 and 100: D-15. Configuration Management Conf
Page 101 and 102: Version 1: Jan 2006 93 Air Force In
Page 103 and 104: D-16. Training (continued) Evaluati
Page 105: D-17. Assessment References (contin
Page 110 and 111: E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC (continued) Su
Page 112 and 113: E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC (continued)
Page 115 and 116: F. Evaluation Criteria for Performa
Page 117 and 118: F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 119 and 120: F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 121: F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 124 and 125: Figure G-1. Linkage Between System
Page 126 and 127: G.6 Review the Contract. The solici
Page 129 and 130: H. ILA Meetings and Presentations H
Page 131: ecommended certification rating. Th
Page 134 and 135: CR—Component Reliability CSI—Cr
Page 136 and 137: MOA—Memorandum of Agreement MOU
Page 138: XML—eXtensible Markup Language Ve
show all

USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?