USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...
USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...
USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC<br />
Evaluation Criteria<br />
• Has the LCMP been coordinated with the user community<br />
• Have all required logistics resources been procured and delivered to the user<br />
Maintenance<br />
• What post-production issues have been identified<br />
• Have corrective actions or plans been developed to address these issues<br />
• What is the schedule for supportability assessments<br />
• What is the schedule for post-deployment reviews<br />
• Who is responsible for maintaining the maintenance plan<br />
• Is the maintenance concept rational and articulate<br />
Depot Planning<br />
• Has the SORAP been completed and approved<br />
• Has a depot maintenance interservice study been completed and are agreements in<br />
place, if required<br />
• Is the interim depot repair capability trained, equipped, and in place to perform depot<br />
maintenance<br />
• If depot repair is to be performed commercially, has the contract been awarded<br />
• Has the depot manager certified the depot repair capability<br />
• Is the repair capability trained, equipped, and in place to perform depot maintenance<br />
• Are depot capital improvement projects necessary to support this repair capability<br />
completed or on schedule<br />
• Do the planning efforts articulate the required timing for establishing a depot<br />
capability relative to IOC<br />
• Is PPP between the depots, original equipment manufacturers and other PSPs being<br />
considered<br />
• Are cost estimates for establishing depot capability addressed and included in the<br />
product support funding profile<br />
Facilities<br />
• Are required unit-level MILCON projects complete or on schedule<br />
• If MILCON is not complete, what interim facility workarounds have been planned<br />
• Have all beddown sites been activated<br />
• If beddown sites have not been activated, do the activation plans support the system<br />
fielding/deployment on schedule<br />
• Are all host tenant support agreements in place<br />
Warranty<br />
• Does the maintenance plan identify warranty requirements<br />
• Have problems with warranty administration at the Organizational and Intermediate<br />
levels been identified during early fielding of the system<br />
• Have modifications to the warranty program been proposed or implemented to<br />
address those problems<br />
• What incentives have been offered to the contractor to increase the warranty period<br />
Version 1: Jan 2006 101<br />
Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment <strong>Handbook</strong>
Change language