07.01.2015 Views

USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D-3. Product Support Management (continued)<br />

Evaluation Criteria<br />

Milestone<br />

B C FRP<br />

• Do warranty terms and conditions address the program’s risk factors X U U<br />

• Does warranty administration and enforcement include standard<br />

X U U<br />

procedures, including performance measurement, for identifying,<br />

reporting, tracking, and correcting defects and failures covered by the<br />

warranty (Ensure defect reporting, analysis and corrective action<br />

processes are timely and effective.)<br />

• Does the warranty ensure continued contractor responsibility and X U U<br />

involvement beyond delivery and for the entire warranty period and is it<br />

enforceable<br />

• Is the cost-effectiveness assessment of the warranty plan performed<br />

X U<br />

periodically after its initial award<br />

• Are impacts to other related acquisition programs considered when X U U<br />

making product support or program transfer decisions How will support<br />

decisions for this program impact related programs<br />

• Is the sustainment support services contract projected to exceed $100 X U U<br />

million per year requiring PEO/CM management oversight under the<br />

Management and Oversight of <strong>Acquisition</strong> of Services Process<br />

(MOASP)<br />

• Does the Source of Repair Assignment Process decision support<br />

X U U<br />

implementation of a warranty for depot-level maintenance<br />

• Has depot repair partnering been evaluated with regard to potential X U U<br />

warranty repair<br />

• Is achievement of reliability, maintainability and availability design X U U<br />

specification requirements received during functional configuration<br />

audits and has adequate design test assured the design is supportable<br />

• Is the program performing supportability analysis<br />

(http://akss.dau.mil/dag/para 4.4.9) as part of the functional analysis in<br />

the systems engineering process to determine reliability and<br />

maintainability allocations considering total ownership costs<br />

X<br />

Version 1: Jan 2006 53<br />

Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment <strong>Handbook</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!