USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

D-4. Product Support Budgeting and Funding Cost estimates for programs in pre-systems acquisition or system development and demonstration are usually focused on Life-Cycle Costs (LCC). More refined and discrete Life-Cycle Cost Estimates (LCCE) may be used in the PO to support internal decision-making such as evaluating design changes and assessing producibility, reliability, maintainability, and supportability considerations. As programs mature and transition from production and deployment to sustainment, cost estimates that support the acquisition system or program management may be expanded to address TOC. PMs will determine the costs associated with solutions to satisfy mission capability and life-cycle supportability requirements. Adequate resources must be programmed to fully fund product support and sustainment planning. Evaluation Criteria Milestone B C FRP • Have product support funding requirements been identified and X U U documented in a funding strategy document • Are product support funding requirements developed using cost as an X U U independent variable Have accepted cost estimating methods and risk management principles been applied • Have LCCEs, including cost-reduction efforts, been developed and X U U validated to optimize TOC and schedule • Has the product support activity defined and established the level of X U U personnel, material, and other direct costs, including subcontractor and vendor effort, needed to fully carry out its planning and implementation functions for the entire product support strategy • Do funding documents support the budgetary requirements for the X U U product support strategy outlined in the LCMP • Are product support and sustainment funding requirements identified in X U U the APB Does the APB contain cost parameters (objectives and thresholds) for major elements of program LCCs (or TOC, if available) • Have all funding requirements been identified for production, fielding, X U U and sustainment of the system, including funding for training courses, trainer development, procurement, modification and concurrency as appropriate • Are the correct appropriations identified for each product support X U U requirement • Have appropriate decisions been made regarding the type of funds used X U U for procurement of PBL resources (e.g., use of Air Force Working Capital Fund (AFWCF) for long-term spares support for systems that have been procured and deployed rather than use of multi-year increments of appropriated funding) • Are funding shortfalls and impacts identified, prioritized, fully X U U documented and addressed to the PM and resource sponsor • Are funding requirements realistic and appropriately time-phased X U U Version 1: Jan 2006 54 Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment <strong>Handbook</strong>
D-4. Product Support Budgeting and Funding (continued) • Are product support and sustainment requirements reflected in the earned value management system • Has funding been projected to support sustainment activities while program management responsibilities reside within the PEO portfolio and when transferred to the sustainment portfolio • Are product support funding estimates based on Supportability Analysis and result in estimates of supportability resources • Has the funding strategy for product support been reviewed and approved X U U X U U X U U X U U Version 1: Jan 2006 55 Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment <strong>Handbook</strong>
Page 1:
Department of the Air Force Guide f
Page 4 and 5:
Version 1 January 2006 Air Force In
Page 6 and 7:
D. EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR MILESTON
Page 8 and 9:
Version 1: January 2006 Air Force I
Page 10 and 11:
and implementation before each acqu
Page 12 and 13: epresent how a product support stra
Page 14 and 15: Table 3-1. Sustainment Elements Sus
Page 16 and 17: Capabilities Documents (ICD, CDD, ,
Page 18 and 19: assessment process. Each team membe
Page 20 and 21: Table 5-2. Sustainment Element Rati
Page 22 and 23: esponsibility for tracking and reso
Page 25 and 26: A. The Integrated Defense Acquisiti
Page 27 and 28: Version 1: Jan 2006 19 Air Force In
Page 33 and 34: B. Relationship between Reliability
Page 35 and 36: Figure B-1. Cause and Effect Betwee
Page 37 and 38: maintenance- and supply-response ti
Page 39: B-1. RAM Relationships to Sustainme
Page 42 and 43: Typical Document Request Acquisitio
Page 44 and 45: C-1. Milestone B Documentation (con
Page 50 and 51: Typical Document Request Capability
Page 52 and 53: C-2. Milestone C Documentation (con
Page 55 and 56: D. Evaluation Criteria for Mileston
Page 57 and 58: D-1. Warfighter Capability Requirem
Page 59 and 60: D-3. Product Support Management The
Page 61: D-3. Product Support Management (co
Page 65 and 66: D-6. Sustainment Elements of IMP/IM
Page 67 and 68: D-7. Manpower Manpower factors are
Page 69 and 70: D-8. Personnel Personnel factors ar
Page 71 and 72: D-9. Maintenance Acquiring and sust
Page 73 and 74: D-9. Maintenance (continued) Milest
Page 75 and 76: D-9. Maintenance (continued) Evalua
Page 77 and 78: D-10. Supportability Supportability
Page 79 and 80: D-10. Supportability (continued) Ev
Page 81 and 82: D-10. Supportability (continued) Ev
Page 83 and 84: D-11. Systems Engineering (continue
Page 91 and 92: D-12. Data Management Data Manageme
Page 93 and 94: D-12. Data Management (continued) E
Page 95 and 96: D-13. Supply (continued) Evaluation
Page 97 and 98: D-13. Supply (continued) Evaluation
Page 99 and 100: D-15. Configuration Management Conf
Page 103 and 104: D-16. Training (continued) Evaluati
Page 105: D-17. Assessment References (contin
Page 108 and 109: implications of the logistics suppo
Page 110 and 111: E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC (continued) Su
Page 112 and 113:
E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC (continued)
Page 115 and 116:
F. Evaluation Criteria for Performa
Page 117 and 118:
F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121:
Page 124 and 125:
Figure G-1. Linkage Between System
Page 126 and 127:
G.6 Review the Contract. The solici
Page 129 and 130:
H. ILA Meetings and Presentations H
Page 131:
ecommended certification rating. Th
Page 134 and 135:
CR—Component Reliability CSI—Cr
Page 136 and 137:
MOA—Memorandum of Agreement MOU
Page 138:
XML—eXtensible Markup Language Ve
show all

USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?