USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...
USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...
USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D-3. Product Support Management<br />
The PM is responsible for developing a framework for capability-based acquisition and integrated<br />
product support planning. The framework allows the PM to demonstrate the inter-relationship<br />
between acquisition and sustainment by defining a plan that addresses a life-cycle product support<br />
strategy showing how that will satisfy the warfighter needs at best value.<br />
Evaluation Criteria<br />
1. Product Support Management Planning<br />
• Are product support management functions effectively integrated within<br />
the program office organization to address all sustainment elements<br />
adequately<br />
• Are product support functions logically organized with clear delineation<br />
of roles and responsibilities, including those performed by subcontractors<br />
and vendors<br />
• Is the product support activity responsible for definition and<br />
establishment of the system/equipment logistics/supportability technical,<br />
program, schedule, and cost requirements<br />
• Does a single individual have full responsibility for all product support<br />
activities of the program, including those of subcontractors and vendors<br />
• Are product support activities an integral part of the appropriate IPTs and<br />
do those IPTs meet with sufficient regularity to address logistics issues<br />
effectively<br />
• Is the “Support Concept” section of the LCMP developed, updated, and<br />
implemented<br />
• Was market analysis conducted to identify available systems and product<br />
support capabilities (public and private) Does it define opportunities for<br />
achieving support objectives through design and product support<br />
strategies<br />
Milestone<br />
B C FRP<br />
X U U<br />
X U U<br />
X U U<br />
X U U<br />
X U U<br />
X U U<br />
X U U<br />
• Are product support metrics identified in the APB X U U<br />
• Are support-related performance and acceptance criteria developed to be U U<br />
X<br />
demonstrated during planned testing and through M&S<br />
• Are product support parameters and tests included in the Test and X U U<br />
Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)<br />
• Is the IOC date established and defined X U U<br />
• Is the PBL strategy/implementation structured to continuously reduce the<br />
demand for logistics support (e.g., continuous improvement of weapon<br />
system supportability and reduction of Operating and Support [O&S])<br />
costs through a program of dedicated investments, demand reduction, and<br />
improvements in the efficiency of the logistics support system<br />
X U U<br />
• Is planning established/implemented to transition the program’s legacy<br />
systems and associated support structures to the PBL approach, including<br />
the use of a product support integrator to facilitate the transition<br />
X U U<br />
Version 1: Jan 2006 51<br />
Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment <strong>Handbook</strong>