USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Human Systems Integration (HSI) D-8. Personnel (continued) Evaluation Criteria • Have individual system and platform personnel requirements been developed in close collaboration with related systems throughout the DoD and in various phases of the acquisition process to identify commonalities and merge requirements and to avoid duplication (e.g., Crew Station Working Group (CSWG)) The PM should consider the cumulative effects of system-of-systems, family-of-systems, and related systems integration in developing personnel requirements. • Has the PM summarized major personnel initiatives necessary to achieve readiness or rotation objectives or to reduce manpower or training costs, when developing the AS The AS and product support strategy must address modifications to the knowledge, skills, and abilities of Air Force specialties if those modifications have cost or schedule issues that could adversely impact program execution. The PM should also address actions to combine, modify, or establish new Air Force specialties or additional skill indicators, or issues relating to hard-to-fill occupations if they impact the PM’s ability to execute the program. • Has the program office pursued HSI initiatives to optimize total system performance and minimize TOC • Has the program office coordinated with the manpower, personnel, training, safety, and occupational health, habitability, survivability, and HFE communities to translate and integrate the HSI thresholds and objectives contained in the capabilities documents into quantifiable and measurable system requirements • Has the program office identified any HSI-related schedule or cost issues that could adversely impact program execution The system’s support strategy should identify responsibilities, describe the technical and management approach for meeting HSI requirements, and summarize major elements of the associated training system. • The Program Office should ensure that Systems Engineering is coordinating the overlapping HSI and ESOH safety and occupational health efforts to avoid duplication of effort and conflicting inputs. Milestone B C FRP X U U X U U X U U X U U X U U X U U Version 1: Jan 2006 62 Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment Handbook
D-9. Maintenance Acquiring and sustaining DoD weapon systems requires support decisions that affect all levels of maintenance. The most important decisions in terms of criticality and legislative constraints are sourceof-repair decisions for depot workloads. Many factors must be considered when determining where and by whom depot maintenance workloads will be accomplished. The Air Force has established the SORAP as a formal process for the PM to ensure all factors are considered and an optimum source-ofrepair decision is made. Evaluation Criteria 1. Maintenance Concept, Design and Analyses • Is the accessibility, diagnostics, repair and sparing concepts for all maintenance levels established • Are the requirements for manpower factors that impact system design utilization rates, pilot-to-seat ratios and maintenance ratios are identified • Are the weapons system and associated software life-cycle supportability, design, installation, maintenance and operating constraints and guidelines identified and documented in the LCMP Milestone B C FRP X U U X U U X U U • Is maintenance planning and analyses consistent with requirements for United X U U States Code (USC) Title 10 core government logistics maintenance capability and PPP • Have PBL solutions have been considered X U U • Does the maintenance concept support the performance requirements in the CDD X • Has a SORAP been completed for core candidates X X U • Has a SORAP been completed for contract candidate workloads (non-core, not currently identified for partnering) X • Has the weapon system been characterized/tested at the proper level to identify failure/degradation conditions under various life-cycle operating and environmental conditions 2. Maintenance Plan • If the Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) approach is implemented, is an on-condition status information system defined (e.g., condition-based maintenance plus (CBM+)) and integrated • Defines specific criteria for repair and maintenance for all applicable maintenance levels in terms of time, accuracy, repair levels, BIT, testability, reliability, maintainability, nuclear hardening, SE requirements (including automatic test equipment), manpower skills and facility requirements for peacetime and wartime environments. X U X U U X U U Version 1: Jan 2006 63 Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment Handbook
Page 1:
Department of the Air Force Guide f
Page 4 and 5:
Version 1 January 2006 Air Force In
Page 6 and 7:
D. EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR MILESTON
Page 8 and 9:
Version 1: January 2006 Air Force I
Page 10 and 11:
and implementation before each acqu
Page 12 and 13:
epresent how a product support stra
Page 14 and 15:
Table 3-1. Sustainment Elements Sus
Page 16 and 17:
Capabilities Documents (ICD, CDD, ,
Page 18 and 19:
assessment process. Each team membe
Page 20 and 21: Table 5-2. Sustainment Element Rati
Page 22 and 23: esponsibility for tracking and reso
Page 25 and 26: A. The Integrated Defense Acquisiti
Page 27 and 28: Version 1: Jan 2006 19 Air Force In
Page 33 and 34: B. Relationship between Reliability
Page 35 and 36: Figure B-1. Cause and Effect Betwee
Page 37 and 38: maintenance- and supply-response ti
Page 39: B-1. RAM Relationships to Sustainme
Page 42 and 43: Typical Document Request Acquisitio
Page 44 and 45: C-1. Milestone B Documentation (con
Page 50 and 51: Typical Document Request Capability
Page 52 and 53: C-2. Milestone C Documentation (con
Page 55 and 56: D. Evaluation Criteria for Mileston
Page 57 and 58: D-1. Warfighter Capability Requirem
Page 59 and 60: D-3. Product Support Management The
Page 61 and 62: D-3. Product Support Management (co
Page 63 and 64: D-4. Product Support Budgeting and
Page 65 and 66: D-6. Sustainment Elements of IMP/IM
Page 67 and 68: D-7. Manpower Manpower factors are
Page 69: D-8. Personnel Personnel factors ar
Page 73 and 74: D-9. Maintenance (continued) Milest
Page 75 and 76: D-9. Maintenance (continued) Evalua
Page 77 and 78: D-10. Supportability Supportability
Page 79 and 80: D-10. Supportability (continued) Ev
Page 81 and 82: D-10. Supportability (continued) Ev
Page 83 and 84: D-11. Systems Engineering (continue
Page 91 and 92: D-12. Data Management Data Manageme
Page 93 and 94: D-12. Data Management (continued) E
Page 95 and 96: D-13. Supply (continued) Evaluation
Page 97 and 98: D-13. Supply (continued) Evaluation
Page 99 and 100: D-15. Configuration Management Conf
Page 103 and 104: D-16. Training (continued) Evaluati
Page 105: D-17. Assessment References (contin
Page 108 and 109: implications of the logistics suppo
Page 110 and 111: E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC (continued) Su
Page 112 and 113: E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC (continued)
Page 115 and 116: F. Evaluation Criteria for Performa
Page 117 and 118: F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 119 and 120: F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 121:
F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 124 and 125:
Figure G-1. Linkage Between System
Page 126 and 127:
G.6 Review the Contract. The solici
Page 129 and 130:
H. ILA Meetings and Presentations H
Page 131:
ecommended certification rating. Th
Page 134 and 135:
CR—Component Reliability CSI—Cr
Page 136 and 137:
MOA—Memorandum of Agreement MOU
Page 138:
XML—eXtensible Markup Language Ve
show all

USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?