USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

D-7. Manpower (continued) Evaluation Criteria • Are inherently governmental and exempted commercial functions retained in organic activities • Has an evaluation of the manpower pipeline required and/or available to support a new system been accomplished Does the evaluation consider manpower constraints when establishing contract specifications to ensure the human resource demands of the system do not exceed the projected supply • Are manpower requirements based on task analyses conducted during the functional allocation process Do they consider all factors including fatigue; cognitive, physical, sensory overload; environmental conditions (e.g., heat/cold); and reduced visibility Were manpower requirements considered in personnel capabilities, training, and human factors engineering (HFE) tradeoffs Milestone B C FRP X U X U X U Version 1: Jan 2006 60 Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment Handbook
D-8. Personnel Personnel factors are those human aptitudes (i.e., cognitive, physical, and sensory capabilities), knowledge, skills, abilities, and experience levels that are needed to perform job tasks properly. Personnel factors are used to develop the Air Force specialties and civilian job series for system operators, maintainers, trainers, and support personnel. Personnel officials contribute to the Defense acquisition process by ensuring that the PM pursues engineering designs that minimize personnel requirements and retain the human aptitudes necessary for operation and maintenance of equipment at levels consistent with the projected user population at system fielding. Evaluation Criteria • Has the program office worked with the personnel community to establish a Target Audience Description (TAD) that identifies the cognitive, physical, and sensory abilities, i.e., capabilities and limitations, of the operators, maintainers, and support personnel that are expected to be in place at the time the system is fielded • Has the program office used the TAD as a baseline for the personnel requirements assessment The TAD should include information such as inventory, force structure, standards of grade authorizations, personnel classification (specialty code) description, biographical information, anthropometric data, physical qualifications, aptitude descriptions as measured by the Armed Forces Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), task performance information; skill grade authorizations, physical profile, security clearance and reading grade levels. • Has the program office assessed and compared the cognitive and physical demands of the projected system against the projected personnel supply Have the physical limitations of the target audience (e.g., color vision, acuity, and hearing) been identified and any shortfalls highlighted • Has the program office determined if the new system contains aptitudesensitive critical tasks Has the PM determined if it is likely that personnel in the target audience can perform the critical tasks of the job • Has the PM considered personnel factors such as availability, recruitment, skill identifiers, promotion, and assignment He/she should consider the impact on recruiting, retention, promotions, and career progression when establishing program costs and assess these factors during tradeoff analyses. • Has the PM used a truly representative sample of the target population during test and evaluation (T&E) to get a more accurate measure of system performance A representative sample during T&E will help identify aptitude constraints that affect system use. Milestone B C FRP X U X U X U X U X U X U Version 1: Jan 2006 61 Air Force Independent Logistics Assessment Handbook
Page 1:
Department of the Air Force Guide f
Page 4 and 5:
Version 1 January 2006 Air Force In
Page 6 and 7:
D. EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR MILESTON
Page 8 and 9:
Version 1: January 2006 Air Force I
Page 10 and 11:
and implementation before each acqu
Page 12 and 13:
epresent how a product support stra
Page 14 and 15:
Table 3-1. Sustainment Elements Sus
Page 16 and 17:
Capabilities Documents (ICD, CDD, ,
Page 18 and 19: assessment process. Each team membe
Page 20 and 21: Table 5-2. Sustainment Element Rati
Page 22 and 23: esponsibility for tracking and reso
Page 25 and 26: A. The Integrated Defense Acquisiti
Page 27 and 28: Version 1: Jan 2006 19 Air Force In
Page 33 and 34: B. Relationship between Reliability
Page 35 and 36: Figure B-1. Cause and Effect Betwee
Page 37 and 38: maintenance- and supply-response ti
Page 39: B-1. RAM Relationships to Sustainme
Page 42 and 43: Typical Document Request Acquisitio
Page 44 and 45: C-1. Milestone B Documentation (con
Page 50 and 51: Typical Document Request Capability
Page 52 and 53: C-2. Milestone C Documentation (con
Page 55 and 56: D. Evaluation Criteria for Mileston
Page 57 and 58: D-1. Warfighter Capability Requirem
Page 59 and 60: D-3. Product Support Management The
Page 61 and 62: D-3. Product Support Management (co
Page 63 and 64: D-4. Product Support Budgeting and
Page 65 and 66: D-6. Sustainment Elements of IMP/IM
Page 67: D-7. Manpower Manpower factors are
Page 71 and 72: D-9. Maintenance Acquiring and sust
Page 73 and 74: D-9. Maintenance (continued) Milest
Page 75 and 76: D-9. Maintenance (continued) Evalua
Page 77 and 78: D-10. Supportability Supportability
Page 79 and 80: D-10. Supportability (continued) Ev
Page 81 and 82: D-10. Supportability (continued) Ev
Page 83 and 84: D-11. Systems Engineering (continue
Page 91 and 92: D-12. Data Management Data Manageme
Page 93 and 94: D-12. Data Management (continued) E
Page 95 and 96: D-13. Supply (continued) Evaluation
Page 97 and 98: D-13. Supply (continued) Evaluation
Page 99 and 100: D-15. Configuration Management Conf
Page 103 and 104: D-16. Training (continued) Evaluati
Page 105: D-17. Assessment References (contin
Page 108 and 109: implications of the logistics suppo
Page 110 and 111: E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC (continued) Su
Page 112 and 113: E-1. Pre-IOC and FOC (continued)
Page 115 and 116: F. Evaluation Criteria for Performa
Page 117 and 118: F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 119 and 120:
F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 121:
F-1. PBL Product Support Strategy (
Page 124 and 125:
Figure G-1. Linkage Between System
Page 126 and 127:
G.6 Review the Contract. The solici
Page 129 and 130:
H. ILA Meetings and Presentations H
Page 131:
ecommended certification rating. Th
Page 134 and 135:
CR—Component Reliability CSI—Cr
Page 136 and 137:
MOA—Memorandum of Agreement MOU
Page 138:
XML—eXtensible Markup Language Ve
show all

USAF ILA Handbook - ACC Practice Center - Defense Acquisition ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?