SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
B5 <br />
CORRELATION OF SALIVA AND BLOOD ESTAZOLAM CONCENTRATIONS WITH<br />
BALANCE CHANGES IN SUBJECTS AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF THE DRUG AND/OR<br />
ALCOHOL<br />
Maria Kalal> Piotr Adamowicz l , Ewa Chudzikiewicz l , Wojciech Lechowicz l , Ewa Pufal 2 , Wojciech<br />
Piekoszewski l , Karol Sliwka 2 : IInstitute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forensic</strong> Research in Krakow; 2Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forensic</strong><br />
Medicine <strong>of</strong>the Medical Academy in Bydgoszcz<br />
In 1992-1999, at the Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forensic</strong> Research in Krakow, blood samples taken from 83 drivers<br />
involved in road incidents tested positive for morphine. Benzodiazepines (BZD) were found in 60% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cases. In 2002-2003, the number <strong>of</strong> drivers under the influence <strong>of</strong> drugs involved in accidents was 166.<br />
There was a high prevalence (65%) <strong>of</strong>THC and amphetamines detected. 17% <strong>of</strong> the population were under<br />
the influence <strong>of</strong> morphine and other medications, and 23% tested positive for BZD. In 2002, 278 drivers<br />
were questioned about driving a car after intake <strong>of</strong> a medicinal drug. 134 respondents reported driving a<br />
car while taking a medicinal drug; 41% <strong>of</strong> them used BZD. Although the approach to the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
morphine, THC, cocaine and amphetamines in the blood <strong>of</strong> drivers should without doubt be one <strong>of</strong> "zerotolerance",<br />
the situation concerning the legal limit for BZD is not so clear. .<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> the results both <strong>of</strong> surveys and laboratory examinations, it can be stated that the BZD's<br />
most <strong>of</strong>ten used in Poland are diazepam and estazolam. Therefore, estazolam was chosen as a model<br />
substance for analysis <strong>of</strong> balance changes in persons influenced by the drug. The balance disturbance that<br />
occurs at the legal limit (0.5 giL) <strong>of</strong>alcohol in blood was used as a reference point.<br />
Concentrations <strong>of</strong> estazolam in blood and saliva samples were determined by the LC-MS/APCI method<br />
after LLE. Blood and saliva samples were taken from 25 healthy volunteers who received a single oral<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> 1 mg <strong>of</strong> estazolam. The samples were collected every hour, for four hours. Half an hour before the<br />
last sampling, volunteers received a dose <strong>of</strong> ethanol that led to a blood concentration <strong>of</strong> about 0.5g/1. On<br />
the next day, the same volunteers received alcohol alone at the same dose, and a blood and saliva sample<br />
was taken 0.5 h later.<br />
The LC-MS/APCI method had the following validation parameters [ng/mLl: LOD - 0.33 and 0.63, LOQ <br />
1.09 and 1.05, LOL - up to 200 and 20 for blood and saliva respectively.<br />
The dose <strong>of</strong> estazolam produced average blood concentrations <strong>of</strong> 21, 24, 24 and 29 ng/mL, and saliva <strong>of</strong><br />
2.8, 1.9, 1.9 and 2.2 ng/mL at the respective sampling points. The correlation coefficient between blood<br />
and saliva concentrations was 0.50.<br />
For estimation <strong>of</strong> balance changes in persons influenced by estazolam, alcohol, and estazolam with alcohol,<br />
posturography was used. Using the Langevin equation, the diffusion matrix and the friction coefficient<br />
were calculated. For each <strong>of</strong> the tested persons, 8 stabilograms were obtained, two (with open and closed<br />
eyes) for each <strong>of</strong> the four studied situations:· control (before estazolam or alcohol administration); after<br />
intake <strong>of</strong> alcohol alone; 2 h after intake <strong>of</strong> estazolam alone; as well as after intake <strong>of</strong> ethanol together with<br />
estazolam.<br />
It was shown that the values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient decreased when persons kept their eyes closed,<br />
1<br />
from: 9.45 to 7.25 5. , 9.45 to 6.95 5. 1 and 9.83 to 6.77 5. 1 after administration <strong>of</strong> estazolam, alcohol, and<br />
alcohol with estazolam respectively. These changes showed a trend when under the influence <strong>of</strong> estazolam<br />
(P=0.078) and ethanol (P=0.057), but were statistically significant for estazolam with ethanol (P=0.036) as<br />
compared to the placebo condition. The values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient after administration <strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />
and estazolam did not differ statistically (P=0.677).<br />
The results show that the friction coefficient can be used as an indicator that allows us to assess if a person<br />
is under the influence <strong>of</strong> a medicine that disturbs hislher balance.<br />
Keywords: Estazolam, Friction Coefficient, Posturography.<br />
Page 204