14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B5 <br />

CORRELATION OF SALIVA AND BLOOD ESTAZOLAM CONCENTRATIONS WITH<br />

BALANCE CHANGES IN SUBJECTS AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF THE DRUG AND/OR<br />

ALCOHOL<br />

Maria Kalal> Piotr Adamowicz l , Ewa Chudzikiewicz l , Wojciech Lechowicz l , Ewa Pufal 2 , Wojciech<br />

Piekoszewski l , Karol Sliwka 2 : IInstitute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forensic</strong> Research in Krakow; 2Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forensic</strong><br />

Medicine <strong>of</strong>the Medical Academy in Bydgoszcz<br />

In 1992-1999, at the Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forensic</strong> Research in Krakow, blood samples taken from 83 drivers<br />

involved in road incidents tested positive for morphine. Benzodiazepines (BZD) were found in 60% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cases. In 2002-2003, the number <strong>of</strong> drivers under the influence <strong>of</strong> drugs involved in accidents was 166.<br />

There was a high prevalence (65%) <strong>of</strong>THC and amphetamines detected. 17% <strong>of</strong> the population were under<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> morphine and other medications, and 23% tested positive for BZD. In 2002, 278 drivers<br />

were questioned about driving a car after intake <strong>of</strong> a medicinal drug. 134 respondents reported driving a<br />

car while taking a medicinal drug; 41% <strong>of</strong> them used BZD. Although the approach to the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

morphine, THC, cocaine and amphetamines in the blood <strong>of</strong> drivers should without doubt be one <strong>of</strong> "zerotolerance",<br />

the situation concerning the legal limit for BZD is not so clear. .<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> the results both <strong>of</strong> surveys and laboratory examinations, it can be stated that the BZD's<br />

most <strong>of</strong>ten used in Poland are diazepam and estazolam. Therefore, estazolam was chosen as a model<br />

substance for analysis <strong>of</strong> balance changes in persons influenced by the drug. The balance disturbance that<br />

occurs at the legal limit (0.5 giL) <strong>of</strong>alcohol in blood was used as a reference point.<br />

Concentrations <strong>of</strong> estazolam in blood and saliva samples were determined by the LC-MS/APCI method<br />

after LLE. Blood and saliva samples were taken from 25 healthy volunteers who received a single oral<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> 1 mg <strong>of</strong> estazolam. The samples were collected every hour, for four hours. Half an hour before the<br />

last sampling, volunteers received a dose <strong>of</strong> ethanol that led to a blood concentration <strong>of</strong> about 0.5g/1. On<br />

the next day, the same volunteers received alcohol alone at the same dose, and a blood and saliva sample<br />

was taken 0.5 h later.<br />

The LC-MS/APCI method had the following validation parameters [ng/mLl: LOD - 0.33 and 0.63, LOQ ­<br />

1.09 and 1.05, LOL - up to 200 and 20 for blood and saliva respectively.<br />

The dose <strong>of</strong> estazolam produced average blood concentrations <strong>of</strong> 21, 24, 24 and 29 ng/mL, and saliva <strong>of</strong><br />

2.8, 1.9, 1.9 and 2.2 ng/mL at the respective sampling points. The correlation coefficient between blood<br />

and saliva concentrations was 0.50.<br />

For estimation <strong>of</strong> balance changes in persons influenced by estazolam, alcohol, and estazolam with alcohol,<br />

posturography was used. Using the Langevin equation, the diffusion matrix and the friction coefficient<br />

were calculated. For each <strong>of</strong> the tested persons, 8 stabilograms were obtained, two (with open and closed<br />

eyes) for each <strong>of</strong> the four studied situations:· control (before estazolam or alcohol administration); after<br />

intake <strong>of</strong> alcohol alone; 2 h after intake <strong>of</strong> estazolam alone; as well as after intake <strong>of</strong> ethanol together with<br />

estazolam.<br />

It was shown that the values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient decreased when persons kept their eyes closed,<br />

1<br />

from: 9.45 to 7.25 5. , 9.45 to 6.95 5. 1 and 9.83 to 6.77 5. 1 after administration <strong>of</strong> estazolam, alcohol, and<br />

alcohol with estazolam respectively. These changes showed a trend when under the influence <strong>of</strong> estazolam<br />

(P=0.078) and ethanol (P=0.057), but were statistically significant for estazolam with ethanol (P=0.036) as<br />

compared to the placebo condition. The values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient after administration <strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />

and estazolam did not differ statistically (P=0.677).<br />

The results show that the friction coefficient can be used as an indicator that allows us to assess if a person<br />

is under the influence <strong>of</strong> a medicine that disturbs hislher balance.<br />

Keywords: Estazolam, Friction Coefficient, Posturography.<br />

Page 204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!