14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F26 <br />

TESTING MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS FOR AN EXPANDED MENU OF DRUGS-<br />

PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF POSITIVE FINDINGS<br />

Matthew McMullin* and Anthony Costantino. National Medical Services, Willow Grove, PA, USA.<br />

A<br />

Testing medical pr<strong>of</strong>essional for drugs <strong>of</strong> abuse presents a challenge because <strong>of</strong> their access to drugs <strong>of</strong><br />

choice that are not included in the scope <strong>of</strong> most drug testing menus. To assist substance abuse recovery<br />

programs, designed to allow medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to continue to practice in their field <strong>of</strong> expertise, we<br />

developed an expanded menu <strong>of</strong> analytes that includes many <strong>of</strong> the known abuse drugs encountered in the<br />

medical pr<strong>of</strong>essional population. The positive results data was summarized in three drug groups: Group I<br />

includes those analytes contained in a SAMHSA regulated test menu; Group 2 includes additional opiates<br />

and amphetamine like compounds not covered in the SAMHSA scope, benzodiazepines, propoxyphene,<br />

barbiturates, and methadone; Group 3 includes (cut-<strong>of</strong>f concentration in nglmL) nor-alfentanil (0.5),<br />

butorphanol (20), nor-fentanyl (0.5), ketamine (100), MDMA (200), nor-meperidine (200), nalbuphine (8),<br />

nor-sufentanil (0.5) and tramadol (500). Group 1 and 2 analytes were screened by EMIT while group 3<br />

analytes are screened by LCIMSIMS. All screens were confirmed by either GCIMS or an alternate<br />

LCIMSIMS procedure. The confirmation menus were extensive with low concentration cut-<strong>of</strong>fs. Ethanol<br />

and ethyl glucuronide were not included in this study.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 5,817 samples from medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals were tested for group I and 2 drugs. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

positive drugs findings for the SAMHSA drugs include in group I was 100, with amphetamine at 56 and<br />

opiates at 34 representing most <strong>of</strong> the positive findings. With the group 2 drugs there were an additional<br />

386 positive drug findings with 193 benzodiazepines findings and the expanded opiates panel (excluding<br />

morphine and codeine) accounting for 134 <strong>of</strong> the positive findings. A total <strong>of</strong> 4,043 samples were tested<br />

for group 3 analytes, and there were 186 positive drug findings. Tramadol, meperidine, and nalbuphine<br />

were the most frequently reported positive findings in the group 3 drugs, accounted for 120, 30 and 14,<br />

respectively.<br />

Drug Groupings<br />

Positive Drug Findings!<br />

Drug Group<br />

Cumulative Positive<br />

Drug Findings<br />

(Group 1) SAMHSA Drugs 100 <strong>of</strong> 5817 samples 100<br />

(Group 2) expanded EMIT panels 386 <strong>of</strong> 5817 samples 486<br />

i<br />

. (Group 3) LCMSMS panel<br />

i<br />

207 <strong>of</strong>4043 samples 693<br />

These preliminary finding support the use <strong>of</strong> expanded testing menus when testing medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

who are in drug recovery programs. Caution must be used when interpreting these findings since some<br />

positive findings were listed as prescribed medications.<br />

Keywords: medical pr<strong>of</strong>essional, positive-rate, LCIMSIMS.<br />

Page 280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!