SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F26 <br />
TESTING MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS FOR AN EXPANDED MENU OF DRUGS-<br />
PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF POSITIVE FINDINGS<br />
Matthew McMullin* and Anthony Costantino. National Medical Services, Willow Grove, PA, USA.<br />
A<br />
Testing medical pr<strong>of</strong>essional for drugs <strong>of</strong> abuse presents a challenge because <strong>of</strong> their access to drugs <strong>of</strong><br />
choice that are not included in the scope <strong>of</strong> most drug testing menus. To assist substance abuse recovery<br />
programs, designed to allow medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to continue to practice in their field <strong>of</strong> expertise, we<br />
developed an expanded menu <strong>of</strong> analytes that includes many <strong>of</strong> the known abuse drugs encountered in the<br />
medical pr<strong>of</strong>essional population. The positive results data was summarized in three drug groups: Group I<br />
includes those analytes contained in a SAMHSA regulated test menu; Group 2 includes additional opiates<br />
and amphetamine like compounds not covered in the SAMHSA scope, benzodiazepines, propoxyphene,<br />
barbiturates, and methadone; Group 3 includes (cut-<strong>of</strong>f concentration in nglmL) nor-alfentanil (0.5),<br />
butorphanol (20), nor-fentanyl (0.5), ketamine (100), MDMA (200), nor-meperidine (200), nalbuphine (8),<br />
nor-sufentanil (0.5) and tramadol (500). Group 1 and 2 analytes were screened by EMIT while group 3<br />
analytes are screened by LCIMSIMS. All screens were confirmed by either GCIMS or an alternate<br />
LCIMSIMS procedure. The confirmation menus were extensive with low concentration cut-<strong>of</strong>fs. Ethanol<br />
and ethyl glucuronide were not included in this study.<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 5,817 samples from medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals were tested for group I and 2 drugs. The number <strong>of</strong><br />
positive drugs findings for the SAMHSA drugs include in group I was 100, with amphetamine at 56 and<br />
opiates at 34 representing most <strong>of</strong> the positive findings. With the group 2 drugs there were an additional<br />
386 positive drug findings with 193 benzodiazepines findings and the expanded opiates panel (excluding<br />
morphine and codeine) accounting for 134 <strong>of</strong> the positive findings. A total <strong>of</strong> 4,043 samples were tested<br />
for group 3 analytes, and there were 186 positive drug findings. Tramadol, meperidine, and nalbuphine<br />
were the most frequently reported positive findings in the group 3 drugs, accounted for 120, 30 and 14,<br />
respectively.<br />
Drug Groupings<br />
Positive Drug Findings!<br />
Drug Group<br />
Cumulative Positive<br />
Drug Findings<br />
(Group 1) SAMHSA Drugs 100 <strong>of</strong> 5817 samples 100<br />
(Group 2) expanded EMIT panels 386 <strong>of</strong> 5817 samples 486<br />
i<br />
. (Group 3) LCMSMS panel<br />
i<br />
207 <strong>of</strong>4043 samples 693<br />
These preliminary finding support the use <strong>of</strong> expanded testing menus when testing medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
who are in drug recovery programs. Caution must be used when interpreting these findings since some<br />
positive findings were listed as prescribed medications.<br />
Keywords: medical pr<strong>of</strong>essional, positive-rate, LCIMSIMS.<br />
Page 280