14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

M24 <br />

A MICROTITER PLATE ELISA PLATFORM FOR SCREENING ABUSE DRUGS IN ORAL FLUID<br />

Thomas Kupiec*, Lacinda DeCicco, Susan Bernard, Nicole Vu' Analytical Research Laboratories, Oklahoma<br />

City, OK.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate the suitability <strong>of</strong> microtiter plate ELISA assays (Neogen Corp) for<br />

screening <strong>of</strong> abuse drugs in oral fluid (OF), and the efficiency <strong>of</strong> drug recovery from a oral sampling device,<br />

Sarstedt Salivette®. The following drugs were tested at the proposed cut<strong>of</strong>f levels for the respective compound<br />

according to the Federal Workplace Drug Testing Program draft guidelines: cocaine, morphine, 6­<br />

monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), d-amphetamine, d-methamphetamine, and methylenedioxymethamphetamine<br />

(MDMA) and methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA). Twenty, non-smoking, drug-free donors by testimony spit<br />

approximately 25 mL OF into a clean cup and the sample was then poured away from the froth and centrifuged.<br />

All OF samples were confirmed negative by GCIMS for all <strong>of</strong> the tested analytes. The samples were then pooled<br />

to create a blank OF matrix pool used in all assays. The OF pool portions were spiked with the above analytes at<br />

the proposed cut<strong>of</strong>f levels for the respective compound. Next, spiked or blank OF was collected from a cup<br />

using an oral sampling device. The collector pad was held with tweezers and immersed in the cups <strong>of</strong> OF and<br />

then processed according to the manufacturer's protocol. OF samples <strong>of</strong> 20~L were analyzed alongside a<br />

standard curve by ELISA to determine the dilution factor needed to bring the %BlBo <strong>of</strong> each drug in OF at the<br />

standard proposed industry cut<strong>of</strong>f levels into the optimal range for the ELISA. The calibration curve was<br />

established by plotting log concentration VS logit transformation <strong>of</strong> the absorbance ratio for each calibrator and<br />

the blank sample (%BlB o ). The concentrations <strong>of</strong> the analyte in the test samples were then determined from the<br />

calibration curve based on their absorbance ratios, BlB n . The percentage <strong>of</strong> drug recovery from the oral<br />

sampling device was calculated by comparing the concentration <strong>of</strong> the processed sample using the device to the<br />

non-processed sample concentration. The amount <strong>of</strong> drug detected by the ELISA when no collection device was<br />

utilized was determined by Observed/Experimental x 100. The intra-assay precision was evaluated based on the<br />

mean absorbance ratio BlBo <strong>of</strong> the 16 replicate analyses <strong>of</strong> blank samples that were used in LOD determination.<br />

These results are summarized in Table I. The results indicated that this ELISA platform is suitable for the<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the following drugs in OF: cocaine, morphine, 6-MAM, d-amphetamine, d-methamphetamine, and<br />

MDMA.<br />

Table 1<br />

I<br />

!<br />

I<br />

Drug<br />

i Dilution <strong>of</strong><br />

. OF<br />

I<br />

Drug Conc.<br />

.<br />

inOF<br />

(ng/mL)<br />

I<br />

i<br />

1<br />

Amount Recovered<br />

<strong>of</strong> OF<br />

(ng/mL)<br />

No Collector<br />

Collector<br />

Intra-assay<br />

Precision <strong>of</strong><br />

BlBo<br />

!<br />

i Cocaine I: 50<br />

Amphetamine I: 5 i<br />

5<br />

20<br />

25<br />

50<br />

i<br />

4.76±0.15<br />

24.01±1.90<br />

! 17.86±2.56<br />

!<br />

40.86±3.85<br />

2.07±0.32<br />

14.96±2.47<br />

13.84±0.55<br />

36.55±1.94<br />

3.863<br />

3.863<br />

I<br />

I MDA<br />

No dil.<br />

I Methamphetamine 1: 5<br />

MDMA I: 5<br />

Morphine I: 50<br />

I<br />

i 6-MAM I: 5<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

50<br />

100<br />

25<br />

50<br />

25<br />

50<br />

20<br />

40<br />

2<br />

4<br />

10.42±2.58<br />

23.58±23.52<br />

36.37±2.56<br />

56.32±3.20<br />

30.26±6.45<br />

50.07±5.78<br />

I9.62±5.71<br />

42.36±0.96<br />

3.13±0.77<br />

5.67±0.72<br />

56.24±8.96<br />

63.19±16.74<br />

36.30±IO.l8<br />

58.42±2.12<br />

10.581<br />

2.755<br />

22.53±7.5<br />

44.08±6.64 I<br />

8.316<br />

15.18±4.43<br />

32.79±7.43<br />

2.43±0.19<br />

5.56±L25<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I 3.798 i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

4.564<br />

!<br />

I<br />

Keywords: ELISA, Oral Fluid, Drugs <strong>of</strong> Abuse<br />

Page 307

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!