14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

---.,.<br />

F4<br />

IODINE CONTAINING ADULTERANT -<br />

DETECTION BY INTECT® 8<br />

ITS EFFECT ON RAPID DRUG SCREEN AND<br />

Beckie Chien*, Jan Sook, Raphael C. Wong, Branan Medical Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA<br />

Aims:New generation <strong>of</strong> commercial adulterants have included iodine as the main ingredient at sample<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> about 1 mg per ml. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate iodine's effect on a certain<br />

rapid drug screen and its detection by an onsite adulterant dipstick, Intect®8.<br />

Method: The adulteration effect <strong>of</strong> iodine was studied by adding iodine to a urine sample containing three<br />

times the SAMHSA cut-<strong>of</strong>f concentrations <strong>of</strong> five drugs including benzoyl ecgonine (COC), morphine<br />

(OPI), amphetamine (AMP), THC and PCP. The final concentration <strong>of</strong> iodine in the sample was 1 mg/mt.<br />

The adulterated sample was then tested by an onsite rapid drug screen Monitect® PCll over one hour<br />

period. The same sample was also tested with the new Intect 8 onsite adulteration test strip that contains g<br />

test pads including creatinine (CR), nitrite (NI), glutaraldehye CGL), pH, specific gravity (SG), bleach (BL),<br />

pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC) and iodine (I) to evaluate the adulterant's detection over time.<br />

Results: Negative (-) result in the drug screen indicates adulterant was able to modify the positive drug test<br />

result to negative result whereas (+1-) indicates a possible adulteration effect for that specific drug; normal<br />

(N) result in the Intect 8 pad suggests no effect <strong>of</strong> iodine on the specific test pad while abnormal (A)<br />

indicates detection <strong>of</strong>the adulterant by the specific pad.<br />

! Time (min.) COC OPI I AMP I THC PCP<br />

Drug 5 Invalid results due to no control line<br />

i<br />

Screen 10 +<br />

+ + I -<br />

+<br />

Result 30 + + L + I - +<br />

60 + +1­ I + I - +<br />

Time I· CR I Nl GL I ~H SG BL PCC L I<br />

I<br />

5 I N I N N N N A A I A<br />

Intect 8<br />

Result<br />

10 N : N N N N A A I<br />

I<br />

A<br />

30 N j N N N N A A I A<br />

60 I N 1 N N N N N N I N<br />

I<br />

Urine spiked with PCC or BL did not cause an abnormal result with the Iodine pad.<br />

Conclusion: Iodine containing adulterant is shown to mask the presence <strong>of</strong>THC. It also has some effect on<br />

opiate. This adulterant is detectable by an onsite adulteration test device Intect®g in a 30-minute window.<br />

Keywords: Adulteration, Intect, iodine<br />

Page 257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!