14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P3 <br />

POSTMORTEM REDISTRIBUTION OF THE ENANTIOMERS OF CITALOPRAM AND ITS<br />

METABOLITES IN A RAT MODEL<br />

Kugelberg FC i ', Kingback M i , Carlsson B i , Druid H2<br />

iDepartment <strong>of</strong> Clinical Pharmacology, Linkoping University, SE-581 85 Linkoping, Sweden<br />

2Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forensic</strong> Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Enantioselective drug analysis is used to study the variation in the disposition <strong>of</strong> the enantiomers <strong>of</strong><br />

racemic drugs. This type <strong>of</strong> analysis may give additional information in interpreting forensic toxicological<br />

results, provided that the postmortem redistribution is <strong>of</strong> the same magnitude for the enantiomers. One<br />

example <strong>of</strong> a racemic drug is the widely used antidepressant citalopram (CIT) that belongs to the selective<br />

serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Different therapeutic properties have been shown for the CIT<br />

enantiomers, and the S-(+)-enantiomer is responsible for the clinically relevant effects. Recent data indicate<br />

that the R-(-)-enantiomer instead counteracts the SSRI effect that is produced by the S-(+)-enantiomer. The<br />

major CIT metabolites, demethylcitalopram (DCIT) and didemethylcitalopram (DDCIT), are less potent<br />

than the parent compound with regard to SSRI properties. In recent years, several reports on CIT<br />

concentrations in human postmortem cases have become available. However, only limited data are<br />

available describing postmortem concentrations <strong>of</strong> the separate enantiomers <strong>of</strong> CIT and metabolites. There<br />

is a general awareness that the concentration <strong>of</strong> a drug in an autopsy blood sample may not necessarily<br />

reflect the in vivo concentration just before death, and this difference is explained by postmortem drug<br />

redistribution. Thus, in order to accurlltely interpret the postmortem concentrations <strong>of</strong> CIT a general<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the changes in the enantiomer concentrations after death is required. Hence, the aim <strong>of</strong> the<br />

present study was to investigate if postmortem redistribution <strong>of</strong> the enantiomers <strong>of</strong> CIT, DCIT .and DDCIT<br />

occurs in an experimental rat model after three different dosing procedures with racemic CIT. Two rat<br />

groups underwent chronic administration (20 mglkg daily) using subcutaneously (s.c.) implanted osmotic<br />

pumps. After 10 days, one <strong>of</strong> these groups received an acute-on-chronic drug challenge by a single s.c.<br />

injection <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/kg. The third group received the single 100 mg/kg dose only. Heart blood and brain<br />

samples were collected antemortem and 1,3 or 24 h postmortem after storage in room temperature. In an<br />

additional experiment, we examined the role <strong>of</strong> the lungs as a reservoir <strong>of</strong> postmortem drug release and if<br />

the early-phase postmortem redistribution was different in room temperature (21°C) as compared with a<br />

cold environment (4°C). The samples were analyzed with an enantioselective HPLC method with<br />

fluorescence detection. Increased postmortem blood drug and metabolite concentrations compared to<br />

corresponding antemortem concentrations were observed in all groups (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!