14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M27 <br />

DETERMINA TION OF THC IN ORAL FLUID SAMPLES USING LC-MS<br />

Manuel Rivadulla*, Oscar Quintela, Marta Concheiro, Ana Rios, and Angelines Cruz.: <strong>Forensic</strong><br />

Toxicology Service, Institute <strong>of</strong> Legal Medicine, University <strong>of</strong> Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain,<br />

15782<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> THC and its metabolites in biological samples is <strong>of</strong> great relevance for forensic purposes. In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> oral fluid the analysis should determine THC, whereas in urine, it detects the inactive metabolite<br />

THC-COOH. Most laboratories analyze THC in such samples using GC-MS methods, but these<br />

procedures are time-consuming and involve unavoidable previous extraction and derivatization. In this<br />

paper we report a validation method in which the THC is isolated from oral fluid by a simple liquid-liquid<br />

extraction with hexane. The separation and quantitation was done on a positive ion electrospray (BSI<br />

positive) high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in the selected ion<br />

monitoring (SIR) mode. Calibration curves for ,1.9-THC were performed in oral fluid, achieving linearity<br />

between 2 nglmL and 100 ng/mL. The procedure was validated in terms de linearity (coefficient <strong>of</strong><br />

correlation: 0,9956±0,0035), repeatability (5.33-10.02 %, n=6), reproducibility (2.58-14.7 %, n=6). The<br />

limit <strong>of</strong> quantification (LOQ) was defined as the lowest concentration <strong>of</strong> analyte that could be measured<br />

reproducibly and accurately (CV < 20% and bias> 80%), which was 2 ngimL. The LOD was estimated on<br />

the criteria <strong>of</strong> the lowest concentration <strong>of</strong> an analyte that the bioanalytical procedure can reliably<br />

differenciate from the backgroud noise, which was 1 ng/mL. The mean recovery was 86.62%. The method<br />

requires only 200 ilL <strong>of</strong> oral fluid, and has been used to analyze oral fluid samples collected from drivers,<br />

by spitting, salivette and intercept@ modes.<br />

Keywords: LC-MS, Oral Fluid, THC<br />

Page 310

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!