14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P63 <br />

GHB CONCENTRATIONS IN A V ARlETY OF ALCOHOLIC AND NONALCOHOLIC<br />

BEVERAGES AND LIQUID FOOD PRODUCTS<br />

Ines B. Collison"', Kristin Houg, Debra Eck, Robin Kott. <strong>Forensic</strong> Science Services, Orange County<br />

Sheriff/Coroner Department, 320 North Flower St. Santa Ana CA 92703<br />

Casework indicated the presence <strong>of</strong> small amounts <strong>of</strong> GHB in samples <strong>of</strong> Cabemet Sauvignon and Steel<br />

Reserve beer, which according to previous reports could be expected, at least in wine. Due to these results a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> samples <strong>of</strong> different alcoholic, nonalcoholic beverages, and fermented liquid food products were<br />

analyzed for the presence <strong>of</strong> GHB following the method previously described by Couper and Logan* using<br />

smaller volumes <strong>of</strong> sample (100-200 mcL). The limit <strong>of</strong> detection was 0.25 mgIL. A total <strong>of</strong> 108 samples<br />

were tested in duplicate.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> the samples analyzed were positive for GHB although at very low concentrations. In general,<br />

the concentration <strong>of</strong>GHB was higher in red wines (2.00-23.00mglL; n=l1) than in white wines (0.65-9.53<br />

mglL; n=l3). Of all the different kinds <strong>of</strong> vinegar tested (n=5) only white vinegar was negative for GHB<br />

while rice wine, red wine, balsamic and apple cider vinegar were positive (0.83-11.25 mgIL). The GHB<br />

concentration in beer «025-2.10 mgIL; n=29) was lower than it was in wine. For the different kinds and<br />

brands <strong>of</strong> beer tested, there appears to be a correlation between the GHB concentration and the ethanol<br />

content rather than with the type <strong>of</strong> beer analyzed. Although the sample size was small (n=3), the home<br />

brewed beers which typically have a higher alcoholic content also had the higher GHB concentration (1.71­<br />

2.1 0 mg/L). The GHB concentration was either not detected or < 0.50 mgIL in the distilled alcohol samples<br />

tested (n=23). The GHB concentration in the liqueurs tested varied from not detected to 4.20 mgIL (n=II).<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> other non distilled alcoholic drinks, such as sherry, vermouth, and champagne, showed<br />

intermediate concentrations <strong>of</strong> GHB (1.88-6.68 mglL; n=5). Neither <strong>of</strong> the two malt beverages contained<br />

GHB above our cut<strong>of</strong>f. GHB was detected in grape juice (n=2) but not in apple juice. GHB was in noni<br />

juice (Morinda citrifolia, (0.73 mglL)·, but not in the tea from the noni leaves. NoGHB was detected in the<br />

teriyaki sauce tested (n=I). Thethree different kinds <strong>of</strong> soy sauce tested were positive for GHB (2.79-18.10<br />

mglL).<br />

We conclude that although some <strong>of</strong> these products contain GHB,. a minimum <strong>of</strong> 210 L <strong>of</strong> these liquids<br />

would need to be consumed in order to ingest a 5 g dose <strong>of</strong> GHB.<br />

Couper and Logan *(2000) JAnalTox 24: 1-7<br />

Key Words: GHB, alcoholic beverages, food products.<br />

Page 398

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!