SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C23 <br />
BIOMONITORING OF EXPOSURE TO CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS<br />
D. Noort*, MJ. van der Schans and H.P. Benschop<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> Chemical & Biological Protection, TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory, P.O. Box 45, 2280 AA<br />
Rijswijk,The Netherlands<br />
Methods to analyze chemical warfare agents (CWA) and their decomposition products in environmental<br />
samples were developed over the last decades. On the other hand, methods for such analyses in biological<br />
samples have only recently become available. Retrospective detection <strong>of</strong> exposure to CW A can be useful<br />
for various applications. With regard to the "Homeland Defense" program, it can be envisaged that rapid<br />
diagnostic methods can play a pivotal role in case <strong>of</strong> a terrorist attack with CWA. In the same context,<br />
confirmation <strong>of</strong> non-exposure <strong>of</strong> worried citizens is <strong>of</strong> utmost importance. Also, such methods can be used<br />
for forensic analyses in case <strong>of</strong> suspected terrorist activities ("chemical fingerprints"). It is self-evident that<br />
these methods will also be highly valuable from a military point <strong>of</strong> view, e.g., to establish firmly to which<br />
chemicals casualties have been exposed to, which is a starting point for adequate medical treatment, or for<br />
health surveillance <strong>of</strong> workers in destruction facilities <strong>of</strong> chemical warfare agents. This presentation will<br />
focus on a number <strong>of</strong> specific methods currently available for verification <strong>of</strong> exposure to the most common<br />
CWA, i.e., nerve agents and mustard agents.<br />
There are basically four methods to diagnose an exposure to a nerve agent:<br />
1. cholinesterase inhibition measurements<br />
2. analysis <strong>of</strong>hydrolysis products, e.g., alkyl methylphosphonic acids<br />
3. analysis <strong>of</strong> generated phosph<strong>of</strong>luoridates after treatment <strong>of</strong> blood with fluoride ions ("fluoride<br />
reactivation")<br />
4. mass spectrometric analysis <strong>of</strong> phosphylated peptides after enzymatic digestion <strong>of</strong> modified<br />
cholinesterase.<br />
For mustards, there are three distinct methods to assess an exposure:<br />
1. mass spectrometric analysis <strong>of</strong> low molecular urinary metabolites<br />
2. analysis <strong>of</strong> DNA adducts by means <strong>of</strong> mass spectrometric or immunochemical methods.<br />
3. mass spectrometric analysis <strong>of</strong> protein adducts, e.g., to hemoglobin and albumin.<br />
This presentation will focus on methods that are based on the analysis <strong>of</strong>long-Iived protein adducts, i.e., on<br />
methods 3 and 4 for nerve agents and on method 3 for mustards. Advantageously, protein adducts are stable<br />
and therefore detectable weeks or even months after the exposure, in contrast to DNA adducts and urinary<br />
metabolites which are excreted much more rapidly. The developed technology will be described briefly and<br />
examples <strong>of</strong> real exposure incidents will be presented.<br />
Acknowledgements: This presentation covers work that was funded by the US Army Medical Research and<br />
Materiel Command, by the Bundesministerium der Verteidigung, InSan I 3, Germany, and by the<br />
Directorate <strong>of</strong> Military Medical Service <strong>of</strong>the Ministry <strong>of</strong>Defense, The Netherlands.<br />
Keywords: chemical warfare agents, adducts, diagnosis<br />
Page 241