14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C23 <br />

BIOMONITORING OF EXPOSURE TO CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS<br />

D. Noort*, MJ. van der Schans and H.P. Benschop<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Chemical & Biological Protection, TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory, P.O. Box 45, 2280 AA<br />

Rijswijk,The Netherlands<br />

Methods to analyze chemical warfare agents (CWA) and their decomposition products in environmental<br />

samples were developed over the last decades. On the other hand, methods for such analyses in biological<br />

samples have only recently become available. Retrospective detection <strong>of</strong> exposure to CW A can be useful<br />

for various applications. With regard to the "Homeland Defense" program, it can be envisaged that rapid<br />

diagnostic methods can play a pivotal role in case <strong>of</strong> a terrorist attack with CWA. In the same context,<br />

confirmation <strong>of</strong> non-exposure <strong>of</strong> worried citizens is <strong>of</strong> utmost importance. Also, such methods can be used<br />

for forensic analyses in case <strong>of</strong> suspected terrorist activities ("chemical fingerprints"). It is self-evident that<br />

these methods will also be highly valuable from a military point <strong>of</strong> view, e.g., to establish firmly to which<br />

chemicals casualties have been exposed to, which is a starting point for adequate medical treatment, or for<br />

health surveillance <strong>of</strong> workers in destruction facilities <strong>of</strong> chemical warfare agents. This presentation will<br />

focus on a number <strong>of</strong> specific methods currently available for verification <strong>of</strong> exposure to the most common<br />

CWA, i.e., nerve agents and mustard agents.<br />

There are basically four methods to diagnose an exposure to a nerve agent:<br />

1. cholinesterase inhibition measurements<br />

2. analysis <strong>of</strong>hydrolysis products, e.g., alkyl methylphosphonic acids<br />

3. analysis <strong>of</strong> generated phosph<strong>of</strong>luoridates after treatment <strong>of</strong> blood with fluoride ions ("fluoride<br />

reactivation")<br />

4. mass spectrometric analysis <strong>of</strong> phosphylated peptides after enzymatic digestion <strong>of</strong> modified<br />

cholinesterase.<br />

For mustards, there are three distinct methods to assess an exposure:<br />

1. mass spectrometric analysis <strong>of</strong> low molecular urinary metabolites<br />

2. analysis <strong>of</strong> DNA adducts by means <strong>of</strong> mass spectrometric or immunochemical methods.<br />

3. mass spectrometric analysis <strong>of</strong> protein adducts, e.g., to hemoglobin and albumin.<br />

This presentation will focus on methods that are based on the analysis <strong>of</strong>long-Iived protein adducts, i.e., on<br />

methods 3 and 4 for nerve agents and on method 3 for mustards. Advantageously, protein adducts are stable<br />

and therefore detectable weeks or even months after the exposure, in contrast to DNA adducts and urinary<br />

metabolites which are excreted much more rapidly. The developed technology will be described briefly and<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> real exposure incidents will be presented.<br />

Acknowledgements: This presentation covers work that was funded by the US Army Medical Research and<br />

Materiel Command, by the Bundesministerium der Verteidigung, InSan I 3, Germany, and by the<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Military Medical Service <strong>of</strong>the Ministry <strong>of</strong>Defense, The Netherlands.<br />

Keywords: chemical warfare agents, adducts, diagnosis<br />

Page 241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!