SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
M5 <br />
METHOD VALIDATION AND DETERMINATION OF MDMAAND MDA IN HAIR<br />
Hee-Sun Chung l *, Eun-Young Hanl, Won-Kyung Yang l , Jae-Sin Lee l , Yong-Hoon Park I, Eun-Mi Kiml,<br />
Mi-Ae Lim l and Youngchan Y002 : lNational Institute <strong>of</strong> Scientific Investigation, Seoul; 2Korea, School <strong>of</strong><br />
Pharmacy, Chungbuk Nat. University, Chungbuk, Korea<br />
Recently, MDMA and MDA have been used as a recreational drug among young people in Korea. MDMA<br />
is a substitute for methamphetamine (MA), and has recently received much attention from media and law<br />
enforcement as a novel and popular psychoactive agent. As a result <strong>of</strong> the recent interest in designer drug,<br />
the abuse <strong>of</strong> MDMA and MDA has increased and there were cases in which both MA and MDMA were<br />
detected in hair samples. Therefore it was necessary for us to establish the detection method <strong>of</strong>MDMA and<br />
MDA in hair samples. The method validation and uncertainty measurement were also studied and<br />
described. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> MDMA was surveyed in hair specimens submitted for drug testing by this<br />
method.<br />
MDMA, MDA, MDMA-ds, and MDA-ds were purchased from Radian International LLC (Austin, TX,<br />
USA). Hair samples were collected from 791 subjects who were suspected MDMA and MDA users. After<br />
washing, the hair was cut into small pieces <strong>of</strong> less than 1 mm and incubated. SPME extraction was applied<br />
and extracts were derivatized by trifluoroacetic anhydride (TF A). Gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry<br />
(GCIMS) analysis was performed under selective ion monitoring (SIM) conditions for the identification<br />
and quantitation <strong>of</strong>MDMA and MDA.<br />
Limit <strong>of</strong> detection (LOD) and limit <strong>of</strong> quantitation (LOQ) <strong>of</strong> MDA and MDMA were 0.125 ng/mg,<br />
0.25ng/mg respectively. The linear calibration curve ranged from 0.25 to 10 ng/mg with the coefficient<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> R2 >0.99 . Within- and between run precisions were measured in three concentrations<br />
(low 0.8 ng/mg, med 4 ng/mg, high 8 ng/mg). The specificity in blank hair and dyed artificial hair was<br />
studied.. The high concentration <strong>of</strong> ephedrine, norephedrine, pseudoephedrine, nicotine, caffeine,<br />
methoxyphenamine, phenterminein in low QC hair samples (0.8ng/mg) didn't show any interference in this<br />
method. To value the confidence <strong>of</strong> the method, uncertainty was performed at the cut-<strong>of</strong>f level 5 ng/mg<br />
hair samples. The measurement in uncertainty <strong>of</strong> MDMA was ±0.22 -0.30 (95% confidence interval, k=2).<br />
Among 791 hair samples studied, 44 hair samples were positive for MDMA or MDA (5.6 %). The<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> MDA was low in the hairs where both MDMA and MDA were detected indicating MDA<br />
was the metabolite <strong>of</strong> MDMA, while in 4 specimens the level <strong>of</strong> MDA was very high with no MDMA<br />
indicating MDA was administered. However in urine samples from same 44 subjects showed 35 were<br />
negative for MDMA or MDA, while 9 were positive for MDMA. The hair analysis <strong>of</strong>MDMA showed that<br />
a hair sample is a good specimen for the confirmation <strong>of</strong> long abuse <strong>of</strong> MDMA and MDA in comparison<br />
with urine.<br />
Keywords: MDMA, Hair Analysis, Method Validation<br />
Page 288