SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A71 <br />
USE OF STANDARD ADDITION/STANDARD DILUTION FOR QUANTITATION OF<br />
TOXICANTS IN UNUSUAL MATRICES<br />
Erica Horak', Robert Middleberg, National Medical Services, Willow Grove, PA 19090<br />
At the core <strong>of</strong> forensic toxicology is the desire to quantitate toxicants from a vast array <strong>of</strong> biological<br />
matrices. Often a forensic case involves unusual matrices, including decomposed or embalmed tissues,<br />
which present complexity to the sample preparation and analysis. Analyte recovery can be variable in these<br />
types <strong>of</strong> samples; therefore, alternate approaches to quantitation must be considered. One approach taken is<br />
to construct a matrix matched calibration curve. However, blank matrix is <strong>of</strong>ten not readily available, and<br />
particularly by the very nature <strong>of</strong> embalmed or decomposed tissues, a true matrix match does not exist.<br />
Furthermore, recoveries from the blank matrix and actual case samples may still differ. The standard<br />
addition/standard dilution (SASD) technique, on the other hand, accounts for variable percent recovery,<br />
matrix effects, and loss <strong>of</strong> sample, while the sample itself serves as its own quality control. The SASD<br />
technique can take any <strong>of</strong> several approaches. The simplest approach involves establishing a relationship<br />
between the responses <strong>of</strong> the analyte in the native sample (blank) with the response <strong>of</strong> the native sample<br />
with a known analyte concentration added (spike), without consideration <strong>of</strong> an internal standard in the<br />
event one is not available. A second approach includes the use <strong>of</strong> an internal standard, ideally an isotopic<br />
analog <strong>of</strong> the analyte, and establishing the relationship between the response ratios <strong>of</strong> both the blank and<br />
the spike (at one or more concentrations). In a third approach, the native sample is divided into four<br />
aliquots. One aliquot is left untreated and the others are either spiked with various analyte amounts or<br />
diluted. Each sample is then assayed through the analytical method. A plot <strong>of</strong> the response ratio data<br />
versus the amount <strong>of</strong> analyte added yields a line such that the extrapolated negative x-intercept is the<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> the analyte in the native sample. In a final approach, three measurements can be made:<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the blank, the blank spiked at one or more analyte concentration, and the blank diluted by some<br />
factor. The use <strong>of</strong> a derived formula relates the relative responses, and spiked addition and dilution<br />
amounts, to the concentration <strong>of</strong> analyte in the native sample. In this presentation, the method <strong>of</strong> standard<br />
addition/standard dilution as an ideal approach to quantitation <strong>of</strong> drugs in complex and unusual matrix<br />
types will be demonstrated from actual forensic case data. Advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> the technique<br />
will also be discussed.<br />
Keywords: Standard addition; Matrix; Quantitation<br />
Page 185