14.01.2015 Views

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SOFT 2004 Meeting Abstracts - Society of Forensic Toxicologists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A71 <br />

USE OF STANDARD ADDITION/STANDARD DILUTION FOR QUANTITATION OF<br />

TOXICANTS IN UNUSUAL MATRICES<br />

Erica Horak', Robert Middleberg, National Medical Services, Willow Grove, PA 19090<br />

At the core <strong>of</strong> forensic toxicology is the desire to quantitate toxicants from a vast array <strong>of</strong> biological<br />

matrices. Often a forensic case involves unusual matrices, including decomposed or embalmed tissues,<br />

which present complexity to the sample preparation and analysis. Analyte recovery can be variable in these<br />

types <strong>of</strong> samples; therefore, alternate approaches to quantitation must be considered. One approach taken is<br />

to construct a matrix matched calibration curve. However, blank matrix is <strong>of</strong>ten not readily available, and<br />

particularly by the very nature <strong>of</strong> embalmed or decomposed tissues, a true matrix match does not exist.<br />

Furthermore, recoveries from the blank matrix and actual case samples may still differ. The standard<br />

addition/standard dilution (SASD) technique, on the other hand, accounts for variable percent recovery,<br />

matrix effects, and loss <strong>of</strong> sample, while the sample itself serves as its own quality control. The SASD<br />

technique can take any <strong>of</strong> several approaches. The simplest approach involves establishing a relationship<br />

between the responses <strong>of</strong> the analyte in the native sample (blank) with the response <strong>of</strong> the native sample<br />

with a known analyte concentration added (spike), without consideration <strong>of</strong> an internal standard in the<br />

event one is not available. A second approach includes the use <strong>of</strong> an internal standard, ideally an isotopic<br />

analog <strong>of</strong> the analyte, and establishing the relationship between the response ratios <strong>of</strong> both the blank and<br />

the spike (at one or more concentrations). In a third approach, the native sample is divided into four<br />

aliquots. One aliquot is left untreated and the others are either spiked with various analyte amounts or<br />

diluted. Each sample is then assayed through the analytical method. A plot <strong>of</strong> the response ratio data<br />

versus the amount <strong>of</strong> analyte added yields a line such that the extrapolated negative x-intercept is the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> the analyte in the native sample. In a final approach, three measurements can be made:<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the blank, the blank spiked at one or more analyte concentration, and the blank diluted by some<br />

factor. The use <strong>of</strong> a derived formula relates the relative responses, and spiked addition and dilution<br />

amounts, to the concentration <strong>of</strong> analyte in the native sample. In this presentation, the method <strong>of</strong> standard<br />

addition/standard dilution as an ideal approach to quantitation <strong>of</strong> drugs in complex and unusual matrix<br />

types will be demonstrated from actual forensic case data. Advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> the technique<br />

will also be discussed.<br />

Keywords: Standard addition; Matrix; Quantitation<br />

Page 185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!