22.01.2015 Views

Download Tender Document Corrigendum - Western Railway ...

Download Tender Document Corrigendum - Western Railway ...

Download Tender Document Corrigendum - Western Railway ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Subject : Pre-bid clarification on queries received from Industry Participants of TPWS: Date-30.06.2011<br />

TENDER NO. WR/S&T/HQ/2010-11/05 Virar (at Km 60)-Vadodara (at Km 397) section<br />

Sr. No. Cl. No. Firm T<br />

y<br />

p<br />

131 Technical Spec<br />

Section 5.4.12<br />

Page No 97 &<br />

Sch D11 on<br />

page no106<br />

Siemens<br />

T<br />

-<br />

W<br />

S<br />

Original Text Clarification needed Clarification of <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Railway</strong><br />

The schedule of cable markers (6550) may<br />

not be sufficient for the length of the section<br />

(340km) as per the requirement since the<br />

same to be placed at every 30m.<br />

Will railway supply the additional quantity<br />

Appropriate action will be taken by<br />

Engineer-in-Chrage during the<br />

execution.<strong>Tender</strong> should Quote only<br />

as per tender schedule.<br />

132 Page No<br />

108,D15.9<br />

133 RDSO<br />

Specification<br />

for TPWS<br />

Para. 1.2 Page<br />

no.110<br />

134 RDSO<br />

Specification<br />

for TPWS<br />

Para. 2.1 Page<br />

no.112<br />

Siemens<br />

Siemens<br />

Siemens<br />

T<br />

-<br />

W<br />

T<br />

-<br />

W<br />

S<br />

T<br />

-<br />

R<br />

T<br />

-<br />

R<br />

D<br />

S<br />

O<br />

135 Page No 139 Siemens T<br />

-<br />

R<br />

136 Bid Chap – 2<br />

ITT Clause<br />

2.12 (v) g,<br />

Page - 27<br />

Please clarify the quantity mentioned is per<br />

cable or per core or per strand.<br />

Does the use of Euroloop would not provide<br />

further advantages regarding the main task<br />

(avoiding SPAD) and going alongside with<br />

increasing line performance by continuously<br />

updating the signal information in the cab.<br />

The current version of SRS released by<br />

UNISIG is 2.3.0d. Please confirm whether<br />

the same is applicable for this tender.<br />

Tentative space for OB equipment in WAP4<br />

loco, RDSO to provide drawings<br />

Siemens DG Please clarify if the System Performance<br />

Guarantee is to be submitted along with the<br />

offer. As per SCC (Chapter 4), clause no.<br />

4.16, page 50,the Performance guarantee<br />

is to be submitted only by successful bidder<br />

after receipt of LoA<br />

137 Bid Chap – 2<br />

ITT Clause 2.7,<br />

Page – 21<br />

Siemens G EMD Validity: The maximum validity of a<br />

demand draft is 6 Months from the date of<br />

issue. Therefore the same would get expired<br />

before offer validity. Hence we would revalidate<br />

/ issue a fresh draft before the<br />

validity expire & you would arrange to return<br />

the earlier issued draft for cancellation.<br />

Quantity mentioned is Per Terminal .<br />

RDSO/SPN/183/2011 Ver 2 does not<br />

caters for Euroloop.<br />

As per new guidelines issued by<br />

RDSO, UNISIG-SRS Ver 2.3.0d is<br />

applicable.<br />

It has been indicated in Annexure-4<br />

(page 139) of tender document.<br />

This Clause is self explanatory. The<br />

System Performance Guarantee is to<br />

submitted as Para 2.12 (g) on Format-<br />

7. Para 4.16 is regarding<br />

Performance Bank Guarantee, which<br />

is required to be submitted after<br />

issue of LoA by successful bidder.<br />

The Demand Draft submitted as<br />

EMD should be valid as per tender<br />

conditions. Preferably it should be<br />

valid for entire period to validity of<br />

offer ( 6 months).<br />

Pre Bid Queries for TPWS 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!