Download Tender Document Corrigendum - Western Railway ...
Download Tender Document Corrigendum - Western Railway ...
Download Tender Document Corrigendum - Western Railway ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Subject : Pre-bid clarification on queries received from Industry Participants of TPWS: Date-30.06.2011<br />
TENDER NO. WR/S&T/HQ/2010-11/05 Virar (at Km 60)-Vadodara (at Km 397) section<br />
Sr. No. Cl. No. Firm T<br />
y<br />
p<br />
131 Technical Spec<br />
Section 5.4.12<br />
Page No 97 &<br />
Sch D11 on<br />
page no106<br />
Siemens<br />
T<br />
-<br />
W<br />
S<br />
Original Text Clarification needed Clarification of <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Railway</strong><br />
The schedule of cable markers (6550) may<br />
not be sufficient for the length of the section<br />
(340km) as per the requirement since the<br />
same to be placed at every 30m.<br />
Will railway supply the additional quantity<br />
Appropriate action will be taken by<br />
Engineer-in-Chrage during the<br />
execution.<strong>Tender</strong> should Quote only<br />
as per tender schedule.<br />
132 Page No<br />
108,D15.9<br />
133 RDSO<br />
Specification<br />
for TPWS<br />
Para. 1.2 Page<br />
no.110<br />
134 RDSO<br />
Specification<br />
for TPWS<br />
Para. 2.1 Page<br />
no.112<br />
Siemens<br />
Siemens<br />
Siemens<br />
T<br />
-<br />
W<br />
T<br />
-<br />
W<br />
S<br />
T<br />
-<br />
R<br />
T<br />
-<br />
R<br />
D<br />
S<br />
O<br />
135 Page No 139 Siemens T<br />
-<br />
R<br />
136 Bid Chap – 2<br />
ITT Clause<br />
2.12 (v) g,<br />
Page - 27<br />
Please clarify the quantity mentioned is per<br />
cable or per core or per strand.<br />
Does the use of Euroloop would not provide<br />
further advantages regarding the main task<br />
(avoiding SPAD) and going alongside with<br />
increasing line performance by continuously<br />
updating the signal information in the cab.<br />
The current version of SRS released by<br />
UNISIG is 2.3.0d. Please confirm whether<br />
the same is applicable for this tender.<br />
Tentative space for OB equipment in WAP4<br />
loco, RDSO to provide drawings<br />
Siemens DG Please clarify if the System Performance<br />
Guarantee is to be submitted along with the<br />
offer. As per SCC (Chapter 4), clause no.<br />
4.16, page 50,the Performance guarantee<br />
is to be submitted only by successful bidder<br />
after receipt of LoA<br />
137 Bid Chap – 2<br />
ITT Clause 2.7,<br />
Page – 21<br />
Siemens G EMD Validity: The maximum validity of a<br />
demand draft is 6 Months from the date of<br />
issue. Therefore the same would get expired<br />
before offer validity. Hence we would revalidate<br />
/ issue a fresh draft before the<br />
validity expire & you would arrange to return<br />
the earlier issued draft for cancellation.<br />
Quantity mentioned is Per Terminal .<br />
RDSO/SPN/183/2011 Ver 2 does not<br />
caters for Euroloop.<br />
As per new guidelines issued by<br />
RDSO, UNISIG-SRS Ver 2.3.0d is<br />
applicable.<br />
It has been indicated in Annexure-4<br />
(page 139) of tender document.<br />
This Clause is self explanatory. The<br />
System Performance Guarantee is to<br />
submitted as Para 2.12 (g) on Format-<br />
7. Para 4.16 is regarding<br />
Performance Bank Guarantee, which<br />
is required to be submitted after<br />
issue of LoA by successful bidder.<br />
The Demand Draft submitted as<br />
EMD should be valid as per tender<br />
conditions. Preferably it should be<br />
valid for entire period to validity of<br />
offer ( 6 months).<br />
Pre Bid Queries for TPWS 51