Joint Annual Performance Review 2007 - Ministry of Health
Joint Annual Performance Review 2007 - Ministry of Health
Joint Annual Performance Review 2007 - Ministry of Health
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. General hospital management and necessary core values<br />
2. Job descriptions<br />
3. Hospital autonomy<br />
4. Nursing process<br />
5. Feedback on the international conference: Hospital Management Asia<br />
• Recommend strategies and identify TA needs for the continuous enhancements <strong>of</strong><br />
systems, policies and procedures pertaining to quality assurance. Among the technical<br />
assistance identified and proposed by the QAO in 2006 include:<br />
1. Quality Management Training<br />
2. How to improve clinical practice through the use <strong>of</strong> guidelines<br />
3. How to improve the use <strong>of</strong> guidelines in hospitals<br />
III- Constraints :<br />
• Despite the ever-increasing workload <strong>of</strong> the QAO, there was no attendant increase in<br />
its current manpower, which numbers only three (3). With their functions including<br />
travels to the provinces sometimes for days at a time and with numerous meetings and<br />
workshops to attend for its many projects, it was difficult to distribute tasks to only 3<br />
people.<br />
• Even as progress is made on the Quality Assurance policy, however the transferring<br />
from policy to the real-activities was very low. Within the MOH itself, there seems to<br />
be little motivation from other units to coordinate activities directly with the QAO.<br />
Other health partners continue with their plans disjointed from the overall plan set by<br />
the National Policy. For some that do recognise the policy, more work has to be done<br />
to improve coordination.<br />
• Some partners and departments within the ministry itself have come to expect that the<br />
QAO act as an extension <strong>of</strong> their manpower for specific tasks such as medical<br />
missions and ongoing facility assessment. It is for the good <strong>of</strong> the QAO to be involved<br />
in the develop phases since they are at the policy level, but with the current staffing <strong>of</strong><br />
3, it may be detrimental to their other functions to be relied upon for ongoing<br />
repetitive tasks.<br />
• The QIWG members seem to be inactive in supporting to QA policy. As mentioned<br />
above, this could be partly explained by the learning curve that the QIWG is also<br />
going through.<br />
• There is no report from coming from the provincial QA teams on the progress <strong>of</strong> the<br />
activities. Hence, the QAO does not have information to analyse the progress <strong>of</strong> the<br />
QA activities in the provinces.<br />
IV-Priorities for <strong>2007</strong> – 2008<br />
We select some activities, some <strong>of</strong> which are in strategy 9 and 10, which we consider as the<br />
prioritized ones being achieved in 2006 – <strong>2007</strong>.<br />
- 45 -