19.02.2015 Views

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

would “only be raising false hopes.” <strong>The</strong> decision to admit any alien would be based on<br />

the likelihood <strong>of</strong> be<strong>com</strong>ing a public charge and the demonstrable ability to prove that<br />

they would be<strong>com</strong>e a “useful citizen.” 4<br />

Immigrants from Britain or <strong>of</strong> British origin were<br />

preferred and Jews were viewed as particularly unwel<strong>com</strong>e aliens. Jews who were<br />

allowed admittance faced bigotry and mistrust due to their differing culture. Although<br />

thousands (perhaps as high as fifty thousand) <strong>of</strong> Jews filed visa applications only 1,100<br />

were accepted. Jews were not <strong>of</strong>ficially regarded as refugees but as émigrés subject to<br />

the requirements and limitations <strong>of</strong> the Immigration Restriction Amendment Act <strong>of</strong><br />

1931. 5 <strong>The</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Customs was authorized to determine eligibility for entry based<br />

upon guarantees <strong>of</strong> employment, finances and the possession <strong>of</strong> such “knowledge and<br />

skills” which would facilitate absorption, promote the national economy and not pose any<br />

risk to the native population. <strong>Jewish</strong> refugees were advised by the New Zealand High<br />

Commissioner’s Office in London that <strong>of</strong>ficially the Government was not “encouraging<br />

immigration” <strong>of</strong> those lacking “British birth [or] parentage” and visas would be granted<br />

only in “very special cases.” <strong>The</strong> mid-1930’s Comptroller <strong>of</strong> Customs, Edwin Dudley<br />

Good, had declared that non-Jews represented the “more suitable type <strong>of</strong> immigrant.”<br />

4 Ibid., 25.<br />

5 Following an economic downturn in 1920 the New Zealand Government adopted a “White New<br />

Zealand” immigration policy which restricted entry to those who possessed a British background.<br />

Sanderson Beck, “New Zealand to 1950” available from http://www.san.beck.org/20-13-<br />

NewZealandto1950.html ; Internet; accessed August 22, 2010; Ann Beaglehole, A Small Price to Pay:<br />

Refugees from Hitler in New Zealand, 1936-1946 (Wellington, Allen & Unwin, 1988), 15. <strong>The</strong> policy<br />

would allow entry <strong>of</strong> immigrants who were born in the United Kingdom or <strong>of</strong> British parentage and barred<br />

those who were naturalized British subjects, the <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> naturalized parents or who were an “aboriginal<br />

Native or the descendent <strong>of</strong> an aboriginal Native from any Protectorate, Colony or Dominion who lacked<br />

British birth or parentage. Overall, non-whites were tacitly targeted for exclusion. Such categorization was<br />

extended to Jews and other non-British Europeans as well. “1920 White New Zealand Policy Introduced”<br />

available from http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/timeline/9/11; Internet; accessed August 22, 2010.<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!