19.02.2015 Views

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

first secretary <strong>of</strong> the Embassy in Washington, expressed harsh criticism <strong>of</strong> Hitler and his<br />

regime, categorizing them as betrayers <strong>of</strong> the “lasting interests <strong>of</strong> the German<br />

Fatherland…[and] the foe <strong>of</strong> so many things I had been taught Germany stands for.”<br />

One could not serve the Reich, he argued, if it was necessary to abandon “moral law and<br />

loyalty to the true Germany” while supporting false doctrines <strong>of</strong> Aryan superiority.<br />

Meyer condemned Nazi anti-Semitism and declared that the German Jew had always<br />

been a “devoted and useful citizen” and to claim otherwise represented “ignorance or<br />

lying.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> American Association for the Advancement <strong>of</strong> Science meeting, held in<br />

Indianapolis during late December 1937, denounced the suppression <strong>of</strong> “intellectual<br />

freedom” as “intolerable forms <strong>of</strong> tyranny.” An earlier resolution, introduced by<br />

physicist Dr. Robert A. Millikan and astronomer Dr. Henry Norris Russell, was<br />

reaffirmed and viewed the “suppression <strong>of</strong> independent thought and its free expression as<br />

a major crime against civilization itself.” Scientists and all such thinkers were duty<br />

bound to rebuke “all such nations as intolerable forms <strong>of</strong> tyranny” with whom<br />

<strong>com</strong>promise was inherently impossible.<br />

On January 17, 1938 a large percentage <strong>of</strong> leading American publishers<br />

announced that they would withdraw from the annual Leipzig International Congress <strong>of</strong><br />

Book Publishers. Such participation, it was felt, would represent a “contradiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

very essence <strong>of</strong> our function as publishers.” <strong>The</strong>y criticized the censorship, banning and<br />

criminalization <strong>of</strong> the possession <strong>of</strong> ninety percent <strong>of</strong> the works <strong>of</strong> modern German<br />

writers whose works had been translated into English. <strong>The</strong> German Publishers<br />

Association planned to introduce into the Congress a resolution calling for international<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!