19.02.2015 Views

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

The Jewish Trail of Tears The Evian Conference of ... - Haruth.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

immigration and any further admittance <strong>of</strong> refugees would result in a “rupture to the<br />

equilibrium <strong>of</strong> her social body…<strong>The</strong> absorptive capabilities <strong>of</strong> every people has a limit.<br />

This limit has long been exceeded in France. She said so at <strong>Evian</strong>; she repeats it in<br />

London.” 14<br />

Two years prior to the accession <strong>of</strong> Hitler to power the Weimar Government<br />

enacted an emigration tax in an attempt to limit removal <strong>of</strong> foreign currency. In 1933<br />

emigrants from Germany retained seventy five percent <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> their assets. This<br />

percentage was later decreased to fifteen percent and by 1938 it was reduced to five<br />

percent; a policy that severely impacted on the willingness <strong>of</strong> potential receiving nations<br />

to accept penniless refugees. German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop warned<br />

that the refugee problem was an “internal German problem that was not subject to<br />

discussion.” <strong>The</strong> release <strong>of</strong> adequate amounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong> monies “could not be expected<br />

<strong>of</strong> Germany” and any cooperation with the <strong>Evian</strong> conferees “was out <strong>of</strong> the question for<br />

Germany.” Permanent Foreign Secretary Baron Ernst von Weizsäcker informed<br />

Ribbentrop that both the American and British Ambassadors were seeking a meeting <strong>of</strong><br />

George Rublee with German <strong>of</strong>ficials. Such an appointment was necessary if the IGCR<br />

was to “prove its worth.” Germany would undoubtedly be requested to released<br />

increased amounts <strong>of</strong> foreign currency and personal assets; an action that “for obvious<br />

reasons” the Reich cannot provide. Such a refusal on the German side would provide an<br />

opportunity for adverse Western propaganda, namely, that it was “German obstinacy”<br />

14 “Au Comité Intergouvernemental des réfugiés,” Le Temps, August 4, 1938, 5 cited in Caron, Uneasy<br />

Asylum, 186.<br />

306

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!