08.05.2015 Views

1 - Village of Palatine

1 - Village of Palatine

1 - Village of Palatine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TYPE: ORDINANCE SUBMITTED BY: PLANNING & ZONING DATE: 06/25/2012 <br />

DESCRIPTION: Special Use to permit an addition to be setback 22 feet from the rear property line at <br />

175 W, Imperial Court <br />

_ (McCarville\ Case ~0.12-49L ___ . (District: 2L.<br />

COMMITTEE ACTION:<br />

BACKGROUND:<br />

DATE:<br />

The Subject Property contains an existing single-family residence and the Petitioners are proposing to <br />

construct an addition on the rear <strong>of</strong> the home. The addition would be set back 22 feet from the rear <br />

property line; therefore the Petitioners are seeking: <br />

Special Use to permit a rear yard setback <strong>of</strong> 22 feet instead <strong>of</strong> the minimum required 40<br />

feet pursuant to Section 10.06 (c) (13) <strong>of</strong>the <strong>Palatine</strong> Zoning Ordinance.<br />

ANALYSIS:<br />

• The Subject Property is zoned "R-2," Single Family.<br />

• The Petitioners would like to add a 3-season room to the rear <strong>of</strong> their home. The existing home has a<br />

nonconforming rear yard setback at approximately 35 feet. The proposed addition would have a<br />

setback <strong>of</strong> 22 feet.<br />

• The peak height <strong>of</strong> the addition would be 12 feet.<br />

• The addition would be in-line with the south side <strong>of</strong> the house, which is set back slightly less than 10 <br />

feet from the side property line. The Petitioner is aware <strong>of</strong> this, and has indicated to Staff that the <br />

addition will meet the 10 foot required side yard setback. <br />

• There is a 10 foot utility easement along the rear property line. The addition would not encroach on the<br />

easement. The property backs up to Salt Creek, which has an approximate easement width <strong>of</strong> 60 feet,<br />

prior to meeting the closest residential property.<br />

• Building coverage and lot coverage would be approximately 30.1 percent and 41.6 percent, <br />

respectively. Both conform to Code. <br />

ALTERNATIVES:<br />

1. Recommend approval <strong>of</strong> the Special Use.<br />

2. Do not recommend approval <strong>of</strong> the Special Use.<br />

RECOMMENDATION:<br />

Public Hearing:<br />

Residents Testifying:<br />

Concerns:<br />

Vote:<br />

June 12, 2012, Zoning Board <strong>of</strong> Appeals <br />

None <br />

None <br />

The ZBA voted 9-0 to approve the request. Staff concurs with this <br />

recommendation.<br />

ACTION REQUIRED: <br />

Special Use to permit an addition to be setback 22 feet from the rear property line at 175 W. Imperial <br />

Court (McCarville).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!