1 - Village of Palatine

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
JUNE 12, 2012
PAGE 2
• The peak height of the addition would be 12 feet.
• The addition would be in-line with the south side of the house, which is set back slightly less than 10 feet
from the side property line. The Petitioner is aware of this, and has indicated to Staff that the addition will
meet the 10 foot required side yard setback.
• There is a 10 foot utility easement along the rear property line. The addition would not encroach on the
easement. The property backs up to Salt Creek.
• Building coverage and lot coverage would be approximately 30.1 41.6 percent, respectively.
Both conform to Code.
Community Services
Engineering
Environmental Health
Fire Prevention
Public Works
No issues.
No issues.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Since this Petition is not
interest, those stan
Petitioners must s
with the public hea
impact on the value of
the Petitioners
want to
house, which
of the eXisting
friend. The 3
stated there are 3 or
have aluminum frames.
will be no heat in the
with the public
(3) are licable. Specifically, the
I be operated in a manner consistent
al Use will not have a negative
for a Special Use is attached, and
ards.
would replace the existing paver patio.
See of Addison, was sworn in. The petitioners have
. They plan to keep this home for their future life and
of pavers will be eliminated. The room will add use to the
and has a mosquito problem. The addition will be at the same level
. Mr. See is the general contractor for this project and is their
constructed with concrete siding outside with vinyl windows. Mr. See
in the neighborhood which also have 3 season homes, and they
project will meet the building code, it doesn't meet the setback code. There
, but will have electric and insulation.
Mr. Coleman asked if they'd received any feedback from neighbors; the home two doors away to the
east has a similar room and they talked to the owner. The owners of the prop.erty may have talked to
other neighbors.