17.11.2012 Views

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

240 genocide’s wake<br />

naked body, stripped of its materialist trappings, stood outside society: an emblem<br />

of nature, liberated from violent history. As in the 1920s, public nudity came to symbolize<br />

freedom from the deceptive armor of clothing: the naked body was purged<br />

of the artificial, the illicit, the erotic. But unlike the aestheticization of white nudity<br />

at the turn of the century, the West German critique of postfascist culture<br />

was not at first driven by an overtly nationalist agenda. That dimension was to be<br />

added later. Rather, the unclothed body (as an authentic truth-claim) was imagined<br />

in opposition to society and the state.<br />

Encoded by these messages of opposition and rebellion, public nudity was soon<br />

employed by many young Germans as a personal gesture of cultural protest. Seemingly<br />

unconventional and provocative, the practice of disrobing in public was widely<br />

adopted as a pastime with countercultural significance. <strong>Of</strong>fering a “language of<br />

commodity resistance” (Appadurai 1986:30), and inverting the logic of capitalist<br />

consumption, public nudity signified freedom from the constraints of modern German<br />

society. During the 1970s naked sunbathing established itself as a popular<br />

leisure activity, and as urban parks were increasingly thronged by those who preferred<br />

to bask in the sun without clothes, full-body exposure became commonplace<br />

(see Figure 9.2). By the late 1970s, nudity in public parks was so pervasive that local<br />

prohibitions against body exposure were no longer enforced unless “it caused<br />

offense”: naked sunbathing was exempt from public indecency codes (Brügge<br />

1985:149). <strong>The</strong> public display of naked bodies, in particular the public viewing of<br />

nude men, was rendered acceptable or normal by severing the links with historical<br />

memory. Confined to natural settings, the naked body seemed devoid of erotic<br />

or libidinal meanings. <strong>The</strong> topographic surface of the body, regarded as a natural<br />

figuration, was purged of its violent historiography.<br />

NAKED MASCULINITY: ICONIC MEMORIES OF VIOLENCE<br />

This perception of the “natural innocence” of naked bodies was contested in 1981,<br />

when public nudity moved beyond conventional urban spaces. Transgressing the<br />

designated boundaries of parks and park-related greens, nudists began to congregate<br />

along river shores, on beaches, in playgrounds, swimming pools, and cemeteries,<br />

even city centers. In downtown Munich, for instance, nudes were now often<br />

sighted in historic fountains, on streetcars, and in shopping centers (Brügge 1981,<br />

1985). Such a migration of unclothed bodies into the metropolis, the apparent escape<br />

of nakedness from “nature,” provoked among some segments of the German<br />

public deep anxieties about unfettered sexuality.<br />

At issue was the naked male. Exposed masculinity was met with suspicion and<br />

unease. Uncovered male genitalia, the public sight of “dangling and swinging<br />

penises” (Brügge 1981:150), was experienced by many Germans as a threat. <strong>The</strong><br />

open display of the phallus was traditionally prohibited, a thematic much belabored<br />

by the cultural critics of the 1960s. Among leftists, male nudity had been encour-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!