17.11.2012 Views

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

330 critical reflections<br />

vertising such services had the telephone number blacked out and the words 1–800<br />

EAT-SHIT substituted. Although an America’s Watch investigator complained to<br />

the head of the station, the defaced poster was still there four months later (Human<br />

Rights Watch 1995).<br />

As outspoken defenders of the marked category of Latino in the United States,<br />

Martinez, Jimenez, the American Friends Service Committee, America’s Watch,<br />

and Amnesty International use the legal system and the media to defend the rights<br />

of Latinos and thereby forestall violence against them. Nonetheless, neither their<br />

activities nor Latino inclusion in the United States through citizenship has resolved<br />

the inequalities of a racialized exploitation in a political and economic system that<br />

has been constituted historically by the simultaneous exclusion and demand for the<br />

labor of racialized migrants (Lowe 1996). While the Immigration and Naturalization<br />

Service is charged with upholding the law, Andreas (2000) charges that it also<br />

enforces class and racial hierarchies by targeting more susceptible underclasses. In<br />

the process, people learn what is acceptable from within a narrow range of social<br />

identities and behaviors. Further, when some categories of people are reduced to<br />

a less than human status, it becomes easier for those higher in the hierarchy to imagine<br />

that those lower somehow deserve to be brutalized (Scarry 1985; Nagengast<br />

1994). Thus all are controlled, and hierarchy based on skin color and language, and<br />

less obviously but even more centrally on class, is rendered natural.<br />

THE MILITARIZATION OF THE BORDER<br />

<strong>The</strong> gradual militarization of the Border Patrol since the 1980s has played an integral<br />

role in the escalation of violence directed toward Latinos and Latino communities,<br />

legal and illegal alike (Heyman 1995; Dunn 1996; Andreas 2000). In 1984,<br />

elite Border Patrol units known as Border Patrol Tactical Teams (BORTAC) began<br />

receiving special paramilitary training similar to that of SWAT teams. <strong>The</strong><br />

1986 Immigration Reform Control Act (IRCA) was intended to reduce illegal immigration,<br />

and the federal government was prepared to back it up with force. By<br />

1989 Congress had authorized five thousand federal troops for border duty. According<br />

to a former army officer, “It is...absurd that the most powerful nation on<br />

earth cannot prevent a swarming land invasion by unarmed Mexican peasants.<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. Army is entirely capable of plugging the holes permanently and border<br />

patrol [is] excellent military training” (Bassford 1991 quoted in Andreas 1994). Furthermore,<br />

between 1989 and 1999 the budget and number of Border Patrol agents<br />

increased dramatically. By 1998, for example, 2,350 agents were patrolling a sixtysix-mile<br />

strip of border in San Diego County, California, where there had been<br />

only 890 in 1993.<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence of army troops and marines and many more Border Patrol agents<br />

has made border crossings more dangerous for migrants than ever before. A 1997<br />

University of Houston study provides the particulars on twelve hundred people,<br />

presumably all or mostly Mexicans, who died between 1993 and 1996 trying to cross

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!