17.11.2012 Views

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 modernity’s edges<br />

ment.” Not only were the natural resources of indigenous groups exploited, but so,<br />

too, were their human resources, with their labor being utilized in the quest for economic<br />

profits (International Labour <strong>Of</strong>fice 1953). Mistreatment of minorities is a<br />

widespread part of genocidal actions (Kuper 1981, 1985; Chalk and Jonassohn 1990).<br />

ETHNOCIDE, GENOCIDE OR VARIATIONS<br />

THEREOF AGAINST INDIGENOUS PEOPLES<br />

Literally scores of indigenous peoples have been and continue to be the victims of<br />

ethnocide, genocide, or some variation thereof. A detailed discussion of each of<br />

these cases is beyond the scope of this essay, but a table has been generated showing<br />

twentieth-century cases of genocide of indigenous peoples (Table 3.1).<strong>The</strong> table<br />

contains cases drawn from a variety of sources, including the Urgent Action Bulletins<br />

(UABs) of Survival International, reports and publications by the International<br />

Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Cultural Survival, the Minority Rights Group,<br />

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Anti-Slavery International, and<br />

African Rights, as well as from overviews of the situations of indigenous groups<br />

(Burger 1987, 1990; Miller 1993; Wilmer 1993; Maybury-Lewis 1997; Bodley 1999).<br />

Key citations have been provided below for readers who want to pursue the study<br />

of this issue in more depth.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cases of twentieth-century genocide cited here represent a number of perspectives<br />

held by researchers regarding the fate of the various victim groups. As<br />

one will see upon reading the various essays and reports cited, while one scholar<br />

may view a particular situation as ethnocide, another may view it as part of a genocidal<br />

process, and yet another may perceive it as outright genocide. <strong>The</strong> latter situation<br />

makes it abundantly clear as to why certain scholars are working arduously<br />

on the development of new and more exact definitions and typologies of genocide.<br />

Until there is at least a general agreement as to what should and should not constitute<br />

genocide, there will continue to be a certain degree of murkiness in the field.<br />

In light of the ongoing debate and work vis-à-vis definitions, we have made the<br />

conscious choice not to categorize each tragedy specifically as either a case of ethnocide,<br />

genocide, or genocidal massacre because such decisions could be viewed<br />

as somewhat arbitrary. As these cases demonstrate, the genocide of indigenous peoples<br />

is a widespread phenomenon, occurring on every continent and in a variety<br />

of social, political, economic, and environmental contexts.<br />

In virtually every case, genocide is a calculated and generally premeditated set<br />

of actions designed to achieve certain goals, such as the removal of competitors or<br />

the silencing of opponents. Indigenous peoples can also be harmed through the<br />

destruction of their resource base, as occurred, for example, on the Great Plains<br />

of North America with the near-extermination of the buffalo and in the equatorial<br />

zones of South America, Africa, and Asia with the purposeful destruction of<br />

tropical forests.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!