17.11.2012 Views

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

The Anthropology Of Genocide - WNLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

340 critical reflections<br />

even stronger ones. What is more, Border Patrol agents who accuse their fellow<br />

agents of abusing suspects or other wrongdoing up to and including murder, or<br />

who testify against them in court, often suffer retaliation and are sometimes fired<br />

(Human Rights Watch, 1992, 1995).<br />

Most of the people that the Border Patrol apprehends are not drug runners or<br />

terrorists, but migrant workers who cross or attempt to cross without papers. Migrants<br />

have long come to the United States both seeking a better life and responding<br />

to demands for their labor power (Hoffman 1976; Cockcroft 1986), but<br />

the most recent of them have done so within the context of the global economic<br />

restructuring that, in this hemisphere, is epitomized by the North American Free<br />

Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Although NAFTA, combined with Mexican government<br />

measures that have removed price supports for food staples and “liberalized”<br />

agriculture, have meant increased prosperity for some, it has also translated<br />

into increased poverty for many others, the reduction of social services,<br />

privatization of once communal land, and ever larger numbers of foreign-owned<br />

corporations moving into the border zone looking for cheap labor and relaxed environmental<br />

standards (Barry 1995; Ross 1995; Collier 1994; Kearney and Nagengast<br />

1990). When labor is regulated but capital is not, workers from countries<br />

to which globally mobile assembly plants have relocated are discouraged from immigrating.<br />

However, the number of export assembly factories (maquiladoras) along<br />

the Mexican side of the border has quadrupled since the mid-1980s, drawing far<br />

more displaced small farmers and urban poor to the area than can be employed<br />

(see, for example, Tiano 1994). If potential workers still manage, or are allowed,<br />

to cross the border illegally, their illegality renders them economically and politically<br />

vulnerable. <strong>The</strong>y can be better channeled into U.S. secondary and tertiary<br />

labor markets as agricultural workers, gardeners, or day laborers. In those markets<br />

they are often underpaid and exploited (Zabin et al. 1993; Sassen 1991, 1996).<br />

Historically, vast numbers of Mexicans went into the agricultural labor market in<br />

the United States, but the expansion of the service sector and the restructuring of<br />

urban manufacturing since the 1980s has meant the growth of manufacturing:<br />

“sweat shop” jobs that are filled by illegal workers. For example, undocumented<br />

workers fill some 90 percent of Los Angeles garment factory positions (Andreas<br />

1994; Sassen 1996; cf. Tiano 1994). When they no longer need them, agricultural,<br />

service sector, and manufacturing employers often dispose of their labor force by<br />

calling the Border Patrol (Zabin et al. 1993).<br />

<strong>The</strong> employer sanctions that were mandated by the much-heralded Immigration<br />

and Reform Act (IRCA) of 1986 and that are supposed to punish employers<br />

who knowingly hire undocumented workers are sporadically enforced at best.<br />

“<strong>The</strong>re are 7.2 million employers out there,” said an immigration official. “In their<br />

lifetime, they’re never going to see an immigration officer unless they stand up and<br />

scream that they’ve got a factory full of illegal immigrants” (quoted in Andreas<br />

1994:232; see also Andreas 2000). <strong>The</strong> 1996 immigration legislation is more dra-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!