27.06.2015 Views

NATS-Annual-Report-2015

NATS-Annual-Report-2015

NATS-Annual-Report-2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> and Accounts <strong>2015</strong> | <strong>NATS</strong> Holdings Limited<br />

Governance 80<br />

Independent auditor’s report to the<br />

members of <strong>NATS</strong> Holdings Limited<br />

(continued)<br />

Respective responsibilities<br />

of directors and auditor<br />

As explained more fully in the statement of directors’ responsibilities, the directors<br />

are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied<br />

that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion<br />

on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International<br />

Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with<br />

the Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing Council’s (FRC’s) Ethical Standards for Auditors.<br />

As a result of a contractual agreement between the company’s shareholders<br />

requiring compliance with certain aspects of the UK Corporate Governance Code, the<br />

directors have included a corporate governance statement relating to the company’s<br />

compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code, a statement in relation to going<br />

concern and a directors’ remuneration report and have asked us to report on these<br />

statements as if the company were listed.<br />

Scope of the audit of the<br />

financial statements<br />

Our application of<br />

materiality<br />

A description of the scope of an audit of financial statements is provided on the<br />

FRC’s website at www.frc.org.uk/auditscopeukprivate<br />

We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit,<br />

and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. For planning, we consider materiality<br />

to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence<br />

the economic decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the<br />

financial statements. In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability<br />

that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality level,<br />

performance materiality, to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly,<br />

misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as<br />

we also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular<br />

circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the financial<br />

statements as a whole.<br />

The materiality for the group financial statements as a whole was set at £9m. This has<br />

been determined with reference to a benchmark of revenue, of which it represents<br />

1%, which is considered to be one of the principal considerations for members of the<br />

company in assessing the financial performance of the group.<br />

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to the committee<br />

all individual audit differences in excess of £180,000. We also agreed to<br />

report differences below this threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting<br />

on qualitative grounds.<br />

Governance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!