recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
172<br />
2 The hurdle approach to <strong>in</strong>teger counts<br />
Consider a sequence <strong>of</strong> transaction prices {P(ti), i: 1→n} observed at times {ti,i: 1→n}. Let {Yi, i: 1→n} be a sequence <strong>of</strong> price changes, where Yi = P(ti)−P(ti−1) is an <strong>in</strong>teger multiple <strong>of</strong> a fixed divisor (tick), then Yi 2Z . Our <strong>in</strong>terest lies <strong>in</strong><br />
modell<strong>in</strong>g the conditional distribution <strong>of</strong> the discrete price changes YijF i 1; where<br />
F i 1 denotes the <strong>in</strong>formation set available at the time transaction i takes place. For<br />
this, we generalize the hurdle approach proposed by Mullahy (1986) and Pohlmeier<br />
and Ulrich (1995) for the Poisson and the negative b<strong>in</strong>omial (Negb<strong>in</strong>) distribution,<br />
respectively, to the doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> negative counts. The basic idea <strong>of</strong> this approach is to<br />
decompose the overall process <strong>of</strong> transaction price changes <strong>in</strong>to three components.<br />
The first component determ<strong>in</strong>es the direction <strong>of</strong> the process (positive price change,<br />
negative price change, or no price change) and will be specified as a dynamic<br />
mult<strong>in</strong>omial response model. Given the direction <strong>of</strong> the price change, count data<br />
processes determ<strong>in</strong>e the size <strong>of</strong> positive and negative price changes, represent<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the second and third component <strong>of</strong> our model. This yields the follow<strong>in</strong>g structure<br />
for the p.d.f. <strong>of</strong> YijF i 1 :<br />
8<br />
Pr½Yi¼yijFi1Š¼ < Pr½Yi < 0jF i 1ŠPr½Yi¼yijYi<br />
< 0; F i 1Š<br />
if yi < 0<br />
Pr½Yi¼0jFi :<br />
Pr½Yi > 0jF i<br />
1Š<br />
1ŠPr½Yi¼yijYi<br />
> 0; F i 1Š<br />
if<br />
if<br />
yi ¼ 0<br />
yi > 0:<br />
(2.1)<br />
The process driv<strong>in</strong>g the direction <strong>of</strong> the price changes is represented by<br />
Pr ½Yi < 0jF i 1Š;<br />
Pr ½Yi¼0jF i 1Š<br />
and Pr ½Yi > 0jF i 1Š;<br />
while the two processes<br />
for the size <strong>of</strong> the price changes conditional on the price direction, are def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by Pr ½Yi¼yijYi < 0; F i 1Š<br />
and Pr ½Yi¼yijYi > 0; F i 1Š:<br />
Note that Pr ½Yi<br />
¼ yij<br />
Yi > 0; F i 1Š is a process def<strong>in</strong>ed over the set <strong>of</strong> strictly positive <strong>in</strong>tegers and<br />
Pr ½Yi¼yijYi < 0; F i 1Š<br />
is the correspond<strong>in</strong>g p.d.f. for strictly negative counts.<br />
This decomposition allows us to model the stochastic behavior <strong>of</strong> the transaction<br />
price changes successively.<br />
We follow Mullahy’s (1986) idea by modell<strong>in</strong>g the size <strong>of</strong> positive price<br />
changes as a truncated-at-zero count process. 3 Let f + (·) be the p.d.f. <strong>of</strong> a standard<br />
count data distribution, then the p.d.f. for the size <strong>of</strong> positive price changes<br />
conditional on the fact that the prices are positive is a truncated-at-zero count data<br />
distribution:<br />
Pr½Yi¼yijYi > 0; F i 1Š<br />
¼ h þ ðyijF i 1Þ<br />
¼ f þðyijF i 1Þ<br />
ð Þ<br />
1 f þ 0jF i 1<br />
The process for the size <strong>of</strong> negative price jumps is treated <strong>in</strong> the same way:<br />
1 f 0jF i 1<br />
R. Liesenfeld et al.<br />
(2.2)<br />
Pr½Yi¼yijYi < 0; F i 1Š<br />
¼ h ðyijF i 1Þ<br />
¼ f yijF ð i 1Þ<br />
; (2.3)<br />
ð Þ<br />
3 Alternatively, one could specify the p.d.f. <strong>of</strong> the transformed count Yi−1 conditional on Yi >0<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a standard count data approach. This approach was adopted by Rydberg and Shephard<br />
(2003) <strong>in</strong> their decomposition model.