20.11.2012 Views

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172<br />

2 The hurdle approach to <strong>in</strong>teger counts<br />

Consider a sequence <strong>of</strong> transaction prices {P(ti), i: 1→n} observed at times {ti,i: 1→n}. Let {Yi, i: 1→n} be a sequence <strong>of</strong> price changes, where Yi = P(ti)−P(ti−1) is an <strong>in</strong>teger multiple <strong>of</strong> a fixed divisor (tick), then Yi 2Z . Our <strong>in</strong>terest lies <strong>in</strong><br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g the conditional distribution <strong>of</strong> the discrete price changes YijF i 1; where<br />

F i 1 denotes the <strong>in</strong>formation set available at the time transaction i takes place. For<br />

this, we generalize the hurdle approach proposed by Mullahy (1986) and Pohlmeier<br />

and Ulrich (1995) for the Poisson and the negative b<strong>in</strong>omial (Negb<strong>in</strong>) distribution,<br />

respectively, to the doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> negative counts. The basic idea <strong>of</strong> this approach is to<br />

decompose the overall process <strong>of</strong> transaction price changes <strong>in</strong>to three components.<br />

The first component determ<strong>in</strong>es the direction <strong>of</strong> the process (positive price change,<br />

negative price change, or no price change) and will be specified as a dynamic<br />

mult<strong>in</strong>omial response model. Given the direction <strong>of</strong> the price change, count data<br />

processes determ<strong>in</strong>e the size <strong>of</strong> positive and negative price changes, represent<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the second and third component <strong>of</strong> our model. This yields the follow<strong>in</strong>g structure<br />

for the p.d.f. <strong>of</strong> YijF i 1 :<br />

8<br />

Pr½Yi¼yijFi1Š¼ < Pr½Yi < 0jF i 1ŠPr½Yi¼yijYi<br />

< 0; F i 1Š<br />

if yi < 0<br />

Pr½Yi¼0jFi :<br />

Pr½Yi > 0jF i<br />

1Š<br />

1ŠPr½Yi¼yijYi<br />

> 0; F i 1Š<br />

if<br />

if<br />

yi ¼ 0<br />

yi > 0:<br />

(2.1)<br />

The process driv<strong>in</strong>g the direction <strong>of</strong> the price changes is represented by<br />

Pr ½Yi < 0jF i 1Š;<br />

Pr ½Yi¼0jF i 1Š<br />

and Pr ½Yi > 0jF i 1Š;<br />

while the two processes<br />

for the size <strong>of</strong> the price changes conditional on the price direction, are def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by Pr ½Yi¼yijYi < 0; F i 1Š<br />

and Pr ½Yi¼yijYi > 0; F i 1Š:<br />

Note that Pr ½Yi<br />

¼ yij<br />

Yi > 0; F i 1Š is a process def<strong>in</strong>ed over the set <strong>of</strong> strictly positive <strong>in</strong>tegers and<br />

Pr ½Yi¼yijYi < 0; F i 1Š<br />

is the correspond<strong>in</strong>g p.d.f. for strictly negative counts.<br />

This decomposition allows us to model the stochastic behavior <strong>of</strong> the transaction<br />

price changes successively.<br />

We follow Mullahy’s (1986) idea by modell<strong>in</strong>g the size <strong>of</strong> positive price<br />

changes as a truncated-at-zero count process. 3 Let f + (·) be the p.d.f. <strong>of</strong> a standard<br />

count data distribution, then the p.d.f. for the size <strong>of</strong> positive price changes<br />

conditional on the fact that the prices are positive is a truncated-at-zero count data<br />

distribution:<br />

Pr½Yi¼yijYi > 0; F i 1Š<br />

¼ h þ ðyijF i 1Þ<br />

¼ f þðyijF i 1Þ<br />

ð Þ<br />

1 f þ 0jF i 1<br />

The process for the size <strong>of</strong> negative price jumps is treated <strong>in</strong> the same way:<br />

1 f 0jF i 1<br />

R. Liesenfeld et al.<br />

(2.2)<br />

Pr½Yi¼yijYi < 0; F i 1Š<br />

¼ h ðyijF i 1Þ<br />

¼ f yijF ð i 1Þ<br />

; (2.3)<br />

ð Þ<br />

3 Alternatively, one could specify the p.d.f. <strong>of</strong> the transformed count Yi−1 conditional on Yi >0<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a standard count data approach. This approach was adopted by Rydberg and Shephard<br />

(2003) <strong>in</strong> their decomposition model.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!