recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Dynamic modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> large-dimensional covariance matrices 299<br />
2.5 A shr<strong>in</strong>kage realized covariance forecast<br />
Although the estimator discussed <strong>in</strong> the previous section is asymptotically errorfree,<br />
<strong>in</strong> practice one cannot record observations cont<strong>in</strong>uously.Amuch more serious<br />
problem is the fact that at very <strong>high</strong> frequencies, the mart<strong>in</strong>gale assumption needed<br />
for the convergence <strong>of</strong> the realized covariances to the <strong>in</strong>tegrated covariation is<br />
no longer satisfied. At trade-by-trade frequencies, market microstructure affects<br />
the price process and results <strong>in</strong> microstructure noise <strong>in</strong>duced autocorrelations <strong>in</strong><br />
returns and hence biased variance estimates. Methods to account for this bias and<br />
correct the estimates have been developed by Hansen and Lunde (2006), Oomen<br />
(2005), Aït-Sahalia et al. (2005), Bandi and Russell (2005), Zhang et al. (2005),<br />
and Voev and Lunde (2007), among others. At low frequencies the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
market microstructure noise can be significantly mitigated, but this comes at the<br />
price <strong>of</strong> <strong>high</strong>er variance <strong>of</strong> the estimator. S<strong>in</strong>ce we are us<strong>in</strong>g daily returns, market<br />
microstructure is not an issue. Thus we will suggest a possible way to reduce<br />
variance. Aga<strong>in</strong> as <strong>in</strong> Section 2.2, we will try to f<strong>in</strong>d a compromise between bias<br />
and variance apply<strong>in</strong>g the shr<strong>in</strong>kage methodology. The estimator looks very much<br />
like the one <strong>in</strong> expression (3). In this case we have<br />
� SRC<br />
t<br />
=ˆα ∗ t Ft + (1 −ˆα ∗ t )�RC<br />
t , (14)<br />
where nowFt is the equicorrelated matrix, constructed from the realized covariance<br />
matrix �RC t <strong>in</strong> the same fashion as the equicorrelated matrix constructed from the<br />
sample covariance matrix, as expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Section 2.2. Similarly to the previous<br />
section, the forecast is simply<br />
ˆ� (src)<br />
t+1|t = �SRC t . (15)<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the realized covariance is a consistent estimator, we can still apply formula<br />
(7) tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the different rate <strong>of</strong> convergence. In order to compute<br />
the estimates for the variances and covariances, we need a theory for the distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> the realized covariance, which is developed <strong>in</strong> Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard<br />
(2004), who provide asymptotic distribution results for the realized covariation<br />
matrix <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous stochastic volatility semimart<strong>in</strong>gales (SVSMc ). Assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that the log price process ln P ∈ SVSMc , we can decompose it as ln P = a∗ +m∗ ,<br />
wherea∗ is a process with cont<strong>in</strong>uous f<strong>in</strong>ite variation paths andm∗ is a local mart<strong>in</strong>gale.<br />
Furthermore, under the condition thatm∗ is a multivariate stochastic volatility<br />
process, it can be def<strong>in</strong>ed as m∗ (t) = � t<br />
0 �(u)dw(u), where � is the spot covolatility<br />
process and w is a vector standard Brownian motion. Then the spot covariance<br />
is def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />
assum<strong>in</strong>g that (for all t