recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Semiparametric estimation for f<strong>in</strong>ancial durations 235<br />
2.2 Predictibility<br />
We analyze the predictibility and specification <strong>of</strong> the model via density forecast, <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />
by Diebold et al. (1998) <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> GARCH models and extensively used<br />
by, among others, Bauwens et al. (2004) to compare different f<strong>in</strong>ancial duration models.<br />
Density forecast is more accurate than po<strong>in</strong>t, or even <strong>in</strong>terval prediction, s<strong>in</strong>ce it relies<br />
on the forecast<strong>in</strong>g performance <strong>of</strong> all the moments. The behavior <strong>of</strong> the out-<strong>of</strong>-sample<br />
density function is evaluated via the probability <strong>in</strong>tegral transform. If the prediction is<br />
correct, the probability <strong>in</strong>tegral transform over the out-<strong>of</strong>-sample should be i.i.d and<br />
uniformly distributed. �<br />
�<br />
Let p<br />
�<br />
dj<br />
� ¯dj−1, ¯yj−1;�ϑ1n, �φ�ϑ1n,�ξn<br />
�<br />
t ′ � �<br />
j−1 , �ξn<br />
for j = n + 1,...,m be a<br />
sequence <strong>of</strong> one-step-ahead density forecasts given by the estimated model, and let<br />
f � �<br />
dj| ¯dj−1, ¯yj−1 be the sequence <strong>of</strong> densities def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the data generat<strong>in</strong>g process<br />
<strong>of</strong> the duration process dj . n and m are the number <strong>of</strong> observations <strong>in</strong>-sample and<br />
out-<strong>of</strong>-sample, respectively. Diebold et al. (1998) show that if the density is correctly<br />
specified<br />
� �<br />
�<br />
p dj � ¯dj−1,<br />
�<br />
¯yj−1;�ϑ1n, �φ�ϑ1n,�ξn<br />
t ′ � �<br />
j−1 ,�ξn = f � �<br />
dj| ¯dj−1, ¯yj−1 .<br />
To test this equality we use the probability <strong>in</strong>tegral transform<br />
� dj<br />
zj =<br />
−∞<br />
� �<br />
�<br />
p u<br />
� ¯dj−1, ¯yj−1;�ϑ1n, �φ�ϑ1n,�ξn<br />
�<br />
t ′ � �<br />
j−1 ,�ξn du.<br />
If the one-step-ahead density forecast equals the density def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the data generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
process, z must be <strong>in</strong>dependent and uniformly distributed. This happens if (1) the predicted<br />
density is correctly specified, (2) the dynamics are well captured, and (3) the<br />
estimated seasonal component fits the out-<strong>of</strong>-sample seasonal pattern. If any <strong>of</strong> these<br />
three elements fails, the <strong>in</strong>tegral probability transform is not <strong>in</strong>dependent and uniformly<br />
distributed. Uniformity can be tested by us<strong>in</strong>g histograms based on the computed z<br />
sequence. If the density is correctly specified, the histogram should be flat. Additionally,<br />
the Spearman’s ρ <strong>of</strong> various centered moments <strong>of</strong> the z sequence may reveal some<br />
dependency <strong>in</strong> z.<br />
Last, a note on how we predict seasonality: Assum<strong>in</strong>g a generalized gamma density,<br />
the seasonal estimator is (13). It depends on (1) the current time-<strong>of</strong>-the-dayt ′<br />
0<br />
and duration<br />
di that come from the same arrival times—see Eq. (5)—and (2) the estimated parameters<br />
ˆϑ1, ˆξ. When forecast<strong>in</strong>g, the parameters are fixed as they have been estimated us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
<strong>in</strong>-sample. But durations and the time-<strong>of</strong>-the-day are those <strong>of</strong> the out-<strong>of</strong>-sample. All this<br />
translates <strong>in</strong>to a forecasted seasonality that changes with the out-<strong>of</strong>-sample <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
and adapts to changes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> the arrival times.<br />
3 Illustration<br />
3.1 Data and transformations<br />
In this section we illustrate the method estimat<strong>in</strong>g the model for two duration processes—<br />
price and volume—perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to two different stocks traded at NYSE. A price duration is<br />
the m<strong>in</strong>imum time <strong>in</strong>terval required to witness a cumulative price change greater than a