20.11.2012 Views

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

258<br />

is to make use <strong>of</strong> the fact that if Z t=I(Y t ≤ y), where I(.) is the <strong>in</strong>dicator function, then<br />

E [Z t | X t = x]=F(y | x). The particular technique we use is the Adjusted Nadaraya–<br />

Watson estimator (Hall et al. 1999; Hall and Presnell 1999) which we state <strong>in</strong> its<br />

multivariate ( M ≥ 1) form.<br />

3.1 The Adjusted Nadaraya–Watson estimator<br />

The Adjusted Nadaraya–Watson estimator <strong>of</strong> F(y|x) is given by<br />

PT ~F t¼1 ðyx j Þ ¼<br />

ZtwtKH ðXtxÞ PT ð Þ<br />

t¼1 wtKH Xt x<br />

where {wt} T t=1= arg max ∏ T t=1wt, with {wt} T t=1 satisfy<strong>in</strong>g the conditions (1) wt ≥ 0<br />

for all t, (2) ∑ T t=1wt=1, and (3) ∑ T t=1wt(Xmt−xm) KH(Xt−x)=0 for all m=1,...,M, and<br />

KH(.) is a multivariate kernel with bandwidth matrix H.<br />

Although the Adjusted Nadaraya–Watson estimator is based on the biased<br />

bootstrap idea <strong>of</strong> Hall and Presnell (1999), it is useful, as noted <strong>in</strong> Hall et al. (1999),<br />

to view the estimator as the local l<strong>in</strong>ear estimator <strong>of</strong> F(y|x) with weights KH(Xt−x) replaced by wt KH(Xt−x), i.e., ~Fðyx j Þ ¼ ^a where â is obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the solution <strong>of</strong><br />

X T<br />

max a; b<br />

t¼1<br />

ðZtaðXtxÞbÞ 2 wtKHðXtxÞ (see Fan and Gijbels 1996, for an authoritative <strong>in</strong>troduction to local l<strong>in</strong>ear and local<br />

polynomial regression methods). It is easy to see from the first-order condition<br />

@ X<br />

@a<br />

T<br />

ðZtaðXtxÞbÞ t¼1<br />

2 wtKHðXtxÞ ¼ 0<br />

that â reduces to ~Fðyx j Þ under condition (3).<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g the unmodified version <strong>of</strong> the local l<strong>in</strong>ear approach (wt=1) may result <strong>in</strong><br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> conditional distributions that are not monotonic <strong>in</strong> y, or that do not lie<br />

always between 0 and 1. The Adjusted Nadaraya–Watson estimates, on the other<br />

hand, always lie between 0 and 1, is monotonic <strong>in</strong> y, and yet share the superior bias<br />

properties as estimates from local l<strong>in</strong>ear methods (Hall et al. 1999), and also<br />

automatic adaptation to estimation at the boundaries (see e.g., Fan and Gijbels<br />

1996). There is no requirement for the conditional distribution to be cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

<strong>in</strong> y. Another justification for us<strong>in</strong>g the adjusted Nadaraya–Watson estimator is<br />

provided by Cai (2002) who establish asymptotic normality and weak consistency<br />

<strong>of</strong> the estimator for time series data under conditions more general than <strong>in</strong> Hall<br />

et al. (1999).<br />

3.2 Practical issues<br />

A. S. Tay, C. T<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> the estimator ~Fðyx j Þ requires a number <strong>of</strong> practical issues to be<br />

addressed. In particular, {pt}has to be computed, and KH(.)=∣H∣ −1 K(H −1 x) has to<br />

(1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!