20.11.2012 Views

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Asymmetries <strong>in</strong> bid and ask responses to <strong>in</strong>novations <strong>in</strong> the trad<strong>in</strong>g process 61<br />

data. Quote changes and trade <strong>in</strong>dicators are computed analogously to the NYSE<br />

case. S<strong>in</strong>ce price improvements are impossible <strong>in</strong> the SSE, there are no transaction<br />

prices <strong>in</strong>side the bid–ask spread. Therefore, we do not require trade-direction<br />

algorithms to classify the trades as either buys or sells.<br />

We rely on the theoretical and empirical research <strong>in</strong> market microstructure to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the exogenous variables to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the vector MCt. Easley and<br />

O’Hara (1987) formally show that large-sized trades are more <strong>in</strong>formative.<br />

Empirically, Hasbrouck (1991) and Barclay and Warner (1993), among others,<br />

show that this relationship is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g but concave. In Easley and O’Hara’s<br />

(1992) model, <strong>high</strong>er trad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity signals new <strong>in</strong>formation. Consistently,<br />

Easley et al. (1997) and Dufour and Engle (2000) f<strong>in</strong>d that shorter trade durations<br />

are associated with larger price impacts. Subrahmanyam (1997) f<strong>in</strong>ds that trades <strong>in</strong><br />

the regional markets are less <strong>in</strong>formative than NYSE trades, arguably because they<br />

attract liquidity-motivated traders (see Bessemb<strong>in</strong>der and Kaufman 1997). Price<br />

<strong>in</strong>stability means uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about the true value <strong>of</strong> the stock (e.g., Bollerslev and<br />

Melv<strong>in</strong> 1994). F<strong>in</strong>ally, a positive (negative) order imbalance between limit orders<br />

to sell and limit orders to buy may signal an overvalued (undervalued) stock (e.g.,<br />

Huang and Stoll 1994).<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g variables are def<strong>in</strong>ed so as to capture the relationships detailed<br />

above. The trade size (Vt) is measured <strong>in</strong> shares. Trade durations (Tt) are computed<br />

as the time <strong>in</strong> seconds between two consecutive trades. A dummy variable (Mt) identifies regional trades. Order imbalance (OIt) is computed as the difference<br />

between ask depth and bid depth. F<strong>in</strong>ally, short-term volatility (Rt) is computed as<br />

the sum <strong>of</strong> the square changes <strong>of</strong> the quote midpo<strong>in</strong>t Pz k¼1 ð qkÞ<br />

2 <strong>in</strong> a 5-m<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terval before each trade. 13<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, we construct eight trad<strong>in</strong>g-time dummies for the NYSE session: one for<br />

trades dur<strong>in</strong>g the first half-hour <strong>of</strong> trad<strong>in</strong>g, five for each trad<strong>in</strong>g hour between 10:00<br />

A.M. and 3:00 P.M. and, f<strong>in</strong>ally, two for the last trad<strong>in</strong>g hour, divided <strong>in</strong> two halfhour<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervals. Similarly, for the SSE session (9:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M.), we construct<br />

n<strong>in</strong>e dummy variables: one for the first half-hour <strong>of</strong> trad<strong>in</strong>g, another one for the<br />

second half-hour, six for each trad<strong>in</strong>g hour between 10:00 and 5:00 P.M. and, f<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />

one for the last half-hour.<br />

5 Estimation <strong>of</strong> the basel<strong>in</strong>e model for IBM <strong>in</strong> 1996<br />

In this section, we present the details <strong>of</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g a restricted version <strong>of</strong> model Eq.<br />

j<br />

(3.7) described <strong>in</strong> Section 3 where fi (MCt,Dt)=1 for all i and j. We use data on a<br />

representative NYSE stock, IBM, <strong>in</strong> 1996. In the next section, we check whether<br />

the dynamic patterns about to be reported for IBM can be generalized to other<br />

stocks, other markets, other time periods, and other model specifications, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the unrestricted model Eq. (3.7).<br />

We consider two alternative specifications <strong>of</strong> the model. The first one uses<br />

the trade-sign <strong>in</strong>dicators xt B S<br />

and xt to represent the trad<strong>in</strong>g process. The second<br />

one uses the trade-size <strong>in</strong>dicators ex B t ¼ xBt log ðVtÞ and ex S t ¼ xSt log ðVtÞ. The<br />

polynomials <strong>in</strong> the autoregressive matrix A(L) are all truncated at lag five, as <strong>in</strong><br />

13 This variable is not def<strong>in</strong>ed for trades performed dur<strong>in</strong>g the first 5 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> trad<strong>in</strong>g. In these cases,<br />

we treat volatility as miss<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!