recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Asymmetries <strong>in</strong> bid and ask responses to <strong>in</strong>novations <strong>in</strong> the trad<strong>in</strong>g process 59<br />
j<br />
fi (MCt,Dt)=1 for all i and j. In this case, the matrix <strong>of</strong> autoregressive polynomials is<br />
time <strong>in</strong>variant, At(L)=A(L), and the impact <strong>of</strong> trades on quotes is perfectly l<strong>in</strong>ear.<br />
We will show that this model suffices to illustrate the essentials <strong>of</strong> the dynamic<br />
relationship between trades and quotes. However, some other aspects <strong>of</strong> this<br />
relationship can only be captured by consider<strong>in</strong>g the more general case.<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g Hasbrouck (1991), we characterize the trad<strong>in</strong>g processes us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicator variables. Namely, xt B S<br />
equals one for buys and zero otherwise, and xt equals one for sells and zero otherwise. The discreteness <strong>of</strong> these variables,<br />
however, may <strong>in</strong>troduce some problems <strong>in</strong> the estimation process. 10 To control for<br />
these potential problems, we also estimate Eq. (3.7) us<strong>in</strong>g the trade size ex i t to<br />
characterize each transaction. In particular, we def<strong>in</strong>e ex i t ¼ xit log ðVtÞ , where Vt is<br />
the size <strong>of</strong> the t-th trade <strong>in</strong> shares.<br />
4 Data<br />
The database comprises <strong>high</strong> <strong>frequency</strong> data on trades and quotes from two<br />
markets with remarkably different microstructures: the NYSE and the SSE. The<br />
NYSE is a peculiar mixture <strong>of</strong> microstructure types. It comb<strong>in</strong>es an electronic limit<br />
order book, only partially transparent, with monopolist market makers, and an<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensive trad<strong>in</strong>g activity at the floor market. The SSE, on the contrary, is a<br />
representative example <strong>of</strong> an electronic order-driven venue. Liquidity provision<br />
depends exclusively on a fully transparent open limit order book. Twenty levels <strong>of</strong><br />
the book are nowadays visible <strong>in</strong> real time for all market participants. There are no<br />
market makers, no floor trad<strong>in</strong>g, price improvements are not possible, and all the<br />
orders are submitted through vendor feeds, and stored or matched electronically.<br />
We use data on two different markets to show that asymmetric dynamics<br />
between ask and bid quotes <strong>in</strong> response to trades are not exclusive <strong>of</strong> the NYSE. In<br />
addition, trades <strong>in</strong> the SSE always <strong>in</strong>volve a market order (or equivalent), the<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g side, and one or more limit orders stored on the book. Therefore, trades<br />
are straightforwardly classified as either buyer or seller-<strong>in</strong>itiated by simply<br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g the side <strong>of</strong> the book the market order hits. Thus, with the SSE data we<br />
do not bear the ambiguity and misclassification problems that appear when traditional<br />
trade-direction algorithms, such as Lee and Ready (1991), are applied to<br />
NYSE data (see Ellis et al. 2000, and Odders-White 2000). F<strong>in</strong>ally, us<strong>in</strong>g Spanish<br />
data we do not have report<strong>in</strong>g delays neither <strong>in</strong> trades nor <strong>in</strong> quotes s<strong>in</strong>ce the book<br />
and trade files are updated simultaneously and <strong>in</strong> real time. Therefore, we avoid the<br />
use ad hoc rules to match trades and quotes, like the classical “five-second rule”<br />
applied to NYSE data. 11<br />
NYSE data is obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the TAQ database. We consider two different<br />
sample periods, January to March 1996 and 2000. Several details <strong>in</strong> the mi-<br />
10 Our model is nonl<strong>in</strong>ear and well behaved around the mean (nonl<strong>in</strong>ear). Like standard l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
probability models (LPM), only <strong>in</strong> the extremes it can give predictions out <strong>of</strong> the zero and one<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g estimation theory for dynamic models with weakly dependent<br />
variables is covered <strong>in</strong> White (1994) and Wooldridge (1994). Park and Phillips (2000) extend it to<br />
cover nonl<strong>in</strong>ear co<strong>in</strong>tegration cases with limited dependent variables.<br />
11 Blume and Goldste<strong>in</strong> (1997) shows that the “five-second rule” could not be generalized to all<br />
sample periods and markets. However, Odders-White (2000) shows that this rule does not seem to<br />
expla<strong>in</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the bias <strong>in</strong>duced by the Lee and Ready’s (1991) algorithm.