recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Macroeconomic surprises and short-term behaviour <strong>in</strong> bond futures 273<br />
lems encountered by tak<strong>in</strong>g a particular bond (for <strong>in</strong>stance, when a bond matures its<br />
price represents shorter and shorter yields). Regard<strong>in</strong>g the fundamentals, we chose<br />
15 different numbers, represent<strong>in</strong>g wide areas <strong>of</strong> the economy such as real economy,<br />
<strong>in</strong>flation, confidence <strong>in</strong>dexes and export-import measures (we refer to Table 1<br />
and Section 4 for further details).<br />
The second component that affects short run jumps <strong>in</strong> asset prices is the<br />
momentum <strong>of</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle. Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>recent</strong> literature on behavioural f<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
and Veronesi (1999), we conjecture that the effect <strong>of</strong> the fundamentals on TY<br />
depends on the general economic situation <strong>of</strong> the economy. For example, it is<br />
<strong>in</strong>tuitive to believe that the effect <strong>of</strong> a positive surprise <strong>in</strong> the unemployment rate<br />
on the TY is not the same when the bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle is <strong>in</strong> contraction as when it is<br />
<strong>in</strong> expansion. As measure <strong>of</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle we use the Institute for Supply<br />
Management Survey (ISM) <strong>in</strong>dex. The difference between ISM and other<br />
measures <strong>of</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle, such as GDP, is that it is the most forwardlook<strong>in</strong>g<br />
measure available <strong>of</strong> the market s<strong>in</strong>ce it is based on expectations. The<br />
ISM <strong>in</strong>dex is the result <strong>of</strong> a survey among 300 people selected from 20 manufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries. The survey <strong>in</strong>cludes questions related to new orders, production,<br />
employment, supplier deliveries and <strong>in</strong>ventories (see Niemira and Zukowsky<br />
(1998, chapter 19) for further details). In order to see the effect <strong>of</strong> the fundamentals<br />
on the TY, we divide the ISM accord<strong>in</strong>g to two criteria: 1) if it is expand<strong>in</strong>g or<br />
contract<strong>in</strong>g and 2) if it is above, below or <strong>in</strong> between (differentiat<strong>in</strong>g as well<br />
expansions and contractions) upper and a lower thresholds (further details are<br />
given <strong>in</strong> Section 4).<br />
Ideally, we would like to estimate a model like<br />
ð1LÞTYt ¼ ½ 1: þ 2ðtrend strength <strong>of</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycletÞ<br />
þ ðtrend strength <strong>of</strong> TY ÞðN Š E½N ŠÞ þ ";<br />
3 t t t t (1)<br />
where Nt is the fundamental, E [N t] its expectation, and hence Nt EN ½ tŠ<br />
is the<br />
forecast<strong>in</strong>g error (or surprise or news).<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> the news <strong>in</strong> TY is caused by the news itself as well as by the trend<br />
strength <strong>of</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle and the trend strength <strong>of</strong> the future bond. At each<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time, the market has a work<strong>in</strong>g hypothesis as to where the economy is and<br />
where it is go<strong>in</strong>g. Simplistically, the macroeconomic releases are test<strong>in</strong>g the market<br />
hypothesis. No drastic price response should be seen if the number falls <strong>in</strong> a<br />
reasonable range around the expectations. If the macroeconomic releases fall<br />
beyond the reasonable bounds, measured by the forecast<strong>in</strong>g error, the re-pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />
effect should be proportional to the forecast error (coefficient α1).<br />
In reality, more factors are at work and they should be evident mostly around<br />
the changes <strong>in</strong> macroeconomic trends. In general, agents are not very good at<br />
call<strong>in</strong>g market tops or bottoms and when the economy is perceived to be turn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
one usually sees a rush to close or reverse exist<strong>in</strong>g positions. Agents are unsure <strong>of</strong><br />
whether a turn is occurr<strong>in</strong>g or whether the number is a statistical fluke <strong>in</strong> the<br />
macroeconomic trend. So we expect an asymmetry <strong>in</strong> the market’s response to<br />
positive or negative forecast errors at perceived phases <strong>of</strong> the economic cycle. This<br />
is represented by coefficient α2.<br />
This asymmetry can be exacerbated by the net position<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the speculator and<br />
hedgers community. The speculators community are usually trend followers and