recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Modell<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial transaction price movements: a dynamic <strong>in</strong>teger count data model 183<br />
the <strong>in</strong>traday trad<strong>in</strong>g time standardized on [0, 1] and ν is a 2K+1 dimensional<br />
parameter vector.<br />
In Eq. (2.23) the standardized absolute price change, "i ¼ ðSiSiÞ Si ; drives<br />
the extended ARMA process <strong>in</strong> λi. Similar to the dynamics structure <strong>in</strong> the<br />
EGARCH model <strong>of</strong> Nelson (1991) we allow λi to depend on the <strong>in</strong>novation term,<br />
and additionally on its absolute value to be able to capture a wide range <strong>of</strong> possible<br />
news impact functions. The vector Di ¼ ðDi; Di 1; ...Di lÞ<br />
0 conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
about the contemporaneous and lagged price directions with a correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
coefficient vector β d =(β d0, β d1 ,...,β dl)′ . The <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> D i ∈ {−1, 1} is to<br />
capture potential differences <strong>in</strong> the behavior <strong>of</strong> the absolute price changes<br />
depend<strong>in</strong>g on the direction <strong>of</strong> the price process. Thus, a negative βd0 implies that<br />
with negative price changes (Di = −1) large absolute price changes are more likely<br />
to occur than with positive price changes (D i = 1). If one <strong>in</strong>terprets the absolute<br />
price changes as an alternative volatility measure, this asymmetry reflects a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong><br />
leverage effect, where downward price movements imply a <strong>high</strong>er volatility than<br />
upward movements. 10 The <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> lagged terms D i − l l =1, 2, . . . allows for a<br />
dynamic variant <strong>of</strong> the leverage effect. Z i S denote further explanatory variables,<br />
which will be discussed below.<br />
2.4 Empirical results for the GLARMA model<br />
For estimation <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> the GLARMA(p,q) model, given by Eqs. (2.20)<br />
to (2.23), we maximize the log-likelihood L2 ¼ Pn i¼1 1 0<br />
i ln hsijDi; ð F i 1Þ<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the BHHH algorithm. We use the Schwarz <strong>in</strong>formation criterion to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the optimal order <strong>of</strong> p and q. The diagnostic checks are based on the standardized<br />
residuals<br />
ei ¼ Si ^ Si<br />
^si<br />
(2.24)<br />
For a correctly specified model, the residuals evaluated at the true parameter<br />
values should be uncorrelated <strong>in</strong> the first two moments with E [e i]=0andE [e i 2 ] =1.<br />
The ML-estimates <strong>of</strong> the pure time series component <strong>of</strong> the GLARMA model<br />
for two specifications allow<strong>in</strong>g for a pla<strong>in</strong> (ζ l = 0) and a more flexible news impact<br />
curve (ζ l ≠ 0) are given <strong>in</strong> Table 2. S<strong>in</strong>ce the coefficients <strong>of</strong> the seasonal component<br />
S(ν, τ, K) are jo<strong>in</strong>tly significant for all specifications estimated, we refra<strong>in</strong> from<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g the results for the models without any seasonal component <strong>in</strong> the absolute<br />
price change variable. The diurnal seasonalities <strong>of</strong> the absolut price changes for<br />
JBX and HAL are depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7. We observe a standard <strong>in</strong>traday volatility (or<br />
market activity) seasonality pattern: A <strong>high</strong> volatility when trad<strong>in</strong>g starts, which<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>es until lunch-time (after around 9,000 s, 12:00 EST), a slight recovery <strong>in</strong> the<br />
early afternoon, and another decrease when the European stock markets close (after<br />
around 16,200 s, 14:00 EST). As for the price direction variable for the JBX data, a<br />
parsimonious GLARMA(1,1)-specification turns out to be best specification, while<br />
10 See, for <strong>in</strong>stance, Nelson (1991).