recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Liquidity supply and adverse selection <strong>in</strong> a pure limit order book market 93<br />
on this distributional assumption. To provide a formal assessment, we have<br />
employed the nonparametric test<strong>in</strong>g framework proposed by Fernandes and<br />
Grammig (2005) and found that the exponential distribution is rejected on any<br />
conventional level <strong>of</strong> significance for our sample <strong>of</strong> stocks. Hasbrouck (2004)<br />
argues that the misspecification <strong>of</strong> the exponential distribution could be responsible<br />
for the discontent<strong>in</strong>g empirical results which have been reported when the model is<br />
confronted with real world data.<br />
Of course, the exponential assumption is convenient both from a theoretical and<br />
an econometric perspective. It yields the closed form conditions for order book<br />
equilibrium (3) which, <strong>in</strong> turn, lend itself conveniently to GMM estimation. However,<br />
the parametric assumption can easily be dispensed with and a straightforward<br />
nonparametric approach can be pursued for GMM estimation. In the appendix we<br />
show that the zero expected pr<strong>of</strong>it condition for the marg<strong>in</strong>al unit at ask price p+k<br />
can be written as<br />
pþk Emm ½ j QþkŠ<br />
X ¼ 0: 12<br />
Assum<strong>in</strong>g exponentially distributed market orders as <strong>in</strong> Eq. (2) we have<br />
E[m∣m ≥ Q +k]=Q +k+λ. Hence, Eq. (7) becomes<br />
Qþk ¼ pþk X<br />
(7)<br />
: (8)<br />
This is an alternative to Eq. (3) to describe order book equilibrium. Although<br />
the closed form expression implied by the parametric distributional assumption is<br />
convenient, it is not necessary for the econometric methodology to rely on it.<br />
Instead, we can rewrite Eq. (7) to obta<strong>in</strong><br />
Emm ½ j QþkŠ<br />
¼ pþk X<br />
: (9)<br />
In order to utilize Eq. (9) for GMM estimation, one can simply replace<br />
E[m∣m ≥ Q+k] by the conditional sample means bE½mm j QþkŠ.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> observations will be large for frequently traded stocks (which is the case <strong>in</strong> our<br />
application), conditional expectations can be precisely estimated by the conditional<br />
sample means. Nonparametric equivalents <strong>of</strong> the marg<strong>in</strong>al break even and update<br />
conditions (4) and (5) can be derived <strong>in</strong> the same fashion as described <strong>in</strong> the<br />
previous section. GMM estimation is more computer <strong>in</strong>tensive s<strong>in</strong>ce evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
GMM objective function <strong>in</strong>volves computation <strong>of</strong> the conditional sample means,<br />
but it is a straightforward exercise.<br />
Empirical evidence suggests that market orders are timed <strong>in</strong> that market order<br />
traders closely monitor the state <strong>of</strong> the book when decid<strong>in</strong>g on the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />
submitted market order (see e.g. Biais et al. (1995), Ranaldo (2004) and Gomber<br />
et al. (2004)). To account for state dependency, Såndas (2001) proposed us<strong>in</strong>g a set<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>struments which scale the value <strong>of</strong> the λ parameter <strong>in</strong> Eq. (2). The<br />
nonparametric strategy developed here can be easily adapted to account for a<br />
12 For notational brevity we omit the subscripts. Market order size m and fundamental price X are<br />
observed at time t, and the equation holds for any price tick p+k,t with associated cumulative<br />
volume Q+k,t, k=1,2 . . . .