Table 1 Sample descriptives Company name Ticker symbol Turnover Mkt. Cap. m Percentage <strong>of</strong> aggr. trades (%) Trades per day LO sub. LO canc. P Eff. spread TUI TUI 26,281,175 2,025 24,723 17.6 1,063 6,767 5,714 18.7 0.125 0.015 CONTINENTAL CONT 25,627,638 4,060 25,574 13.5 1,002 8,036 7,052 31.6 0.092 −0.011 MAN MAN 27,685,031 2,434 26,189 13.0 1,057 7,214 6,235 27.7 0.096 0.003 METRO MEO 38,874,669 5,018 31,480 15.7 1,235 7,975 6,702 35.0 0.089 0.000 LINDE LIN 22,378,772 3,448 24,971 15.8 896 8,342 7,454 43.6 0.080 −0.009 LUFTHANSA LHA 43,946,809 4,548 32,504 11.9 1,352 8,079 6,780 14.2 0.111 0.022 FRESENIUS FME 12,850,947 1,944 20,680 16.7 621 5,764 5,195 54.0 0.098 0.010 THYSSEN-KRUPP TKA 37,892,493 6,450 30,017 11.3 1,262 7,864 6,672 15.9 0.111 0.029 DEUTSCHE POST DPW 43,836,617 6,806 33,330 11.0 1,315 6,861 5,666 18.2 0.097 0.018 HYPO-VEREINSB. HVM 98,351,090 6,629 50,783 15.0 1,937 10,204 8,293 18.7 0.098 0.019 COMMERZBANK CBK 53,171,668 7,569 36,659 12.6 1,450 11,922 10,476 15.4 0.100 0.023 ADIDAS-SALOMON ADS 31,976,047 4,104 32,635 20.1 980 8,057 7,105 92.6 0.070 −0.002 DEUTSCHE BOERSE DB1 35,696,903 4,847 36,359 18.4 982 6,598 5,698 46.9 0.075 0.003 HENKEL HEN3 18,174,548 3,682 25,904 16.6 702 7,989 7,306 65.9 0.077 0.005 ALTANA ALT 30,985,416 3,338 28,310 18.9 1,095 7,718 6,609 48.6 0.079 0.008 SCHERING SCH 51,413,053 7,055 33,756 16.2 1,523 9,111 7,669 40.8 0.071 0.004 INFINEON IFX 146,462,315 4,790 52,331 8.6 2,799 10,320 7,744 11.6 0.104 0.040 BAYER BAY 88,776,121 15,911 36,994 12.4 2,400 15,258 12,988 23.1 0.076 0.012 RWE RWE 97,655,566 12,653 42,203 13.0 2,314 14,438 12,355 33.8 0.062 0.002 BMW BMW 87,854,358 12,211 41,639 14.4 2,110 14,736 12,764 34.7 0.060 0.003 VOLKSWAGEN VOW 104,249,843 9,688 40,963 16.0 2,545 13,474 11,273 39.2 0.056 0.004 BASF BAS 124,434,537 25,425 48,236 13.8 2,580 18,211 15,898 43.3 0.051 0.002 SAP SAP 184,628,162 27,412 65,795 21.9 2,806 19,733 17,095 131.5 0.049 0.001 E.ON EOA 160,625,983 33,753 55,950 13.6 2,871 18,899 16,468 52.5 0.048 0.003 Real. spread 88 S. Frey, J. Grammig
Table 1 (cont<strong>in</strong>ued) Company name Ticker symbol Turnover Mkt. Cap. m Percentage <strong>of</strong> aggr. trades (%) Trades per day LO sub. LO canc. P Eff. spread MUENCH.RUECK MUV2 207,353,230 16,396 60,534 20.7 3,425 20,154 16,894 93.9 0.049 0.005 DAIMLERCHRYSLER DCX 187,737,846 30,316 56,736 14.5 3,309 18,722 15,919 36.4 0.055 0.010 DEUTSCHE TELEKOM DTE 350,627,866 34,858 78,884 5.0 4,445 14,498 11,009 15.7 0.072 0.031 DEUTSCHE BANK DBK 309,282,831 38,228 78,083 19.3 3,961 23,169 19,772 67.2 0.044 0.004 ALLIANZ ALV 289,980,556 33,805 64,114 21.4 4,523 29,791 25,882 100.1 0.049 0.010 SIEMENS SIE 321,704,299 52,893 72,831 16.7 4,418 23,659 19,920 64.0 0.041 0.006 Average 108,683,880 14,076 42,972 15.2 2,099 12,785 10,887 44.5 Mkt. cap. is the market capitalization <strong>in</strong> million euros at the end <strong>of</strong> December 2003, m is the average trade size (<strong>in</strong> euros). Percentage <strong>of</strong> Aggr. trades (%) gives the percentage <strong>of</strong> total trad<strong>in</strong>g volume that has not been executed at the best prices (that is, the order walked up the book). Turnover is the average trad<strong>in</strong>g volume <strong>in</strong> euros per trad<strong>in</strong>g day, trades per day is the average number <strong>of</strong> trades per day, LO sub. and LO canc., respectively, denote the average number <strong>of</strong> non-marketable limit order submissions and cancelations per day. P, eff. spread and real. spread refer to the sample averages <strong>of</strong> midquote, effective spread and realized spread, respectively. The average effective spread is computed by tak<strong>in</strong>g two times the absolute difference <strong>of</strong> the transaction price <strong>of</strong> a trade and the prevail<strong>in</strong>g midquote and averag<strong>in</strong>g over all trades <strong>of</strong> a stock. The average realized spread is computed similarly, but <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g the prevail<strong>in</strong>g midquote, we use the midquote five m<strong>in</strong>utes after the trade. To ensure comparability across stocks, we compute effective and realized spreads relative to the midquote prevail<strong>in</strong>g at the time <strong>of</strong> the trade and multiply by 100 to obta<strong>in</strong> a % figure. The table is sorted <strong>in</strong> descend<strong>in</strong>g order by the difference <strong>of</strong> effective and realized spread. The sample ranges from January 2, 2004 to March 31, 2004 Real. spread Liquidity supply and adverse selection <strong>in</strong> a pure limit order book market 89
- Page 1 and 2:
High Frequency Financial Econometri
- Page 3 and 4:
Prof. Luc Bauwens CORE Voie du Roma
- Page 5:
vi Contents Intraday stock prices,
- Page 8 and 9:
2 L. Bauwens et al. component nicel
- Page 10 and 11:
4 L. Bauwens et al. but provides al
- Page 13 and 14:
Luc Bauwens . Dagfinn Rime . Genaro
- Page 15 and 16:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 17 and 18:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 19 and 20:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 21 and 22:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 23 and 24:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 25 and 26:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 27 and 28:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 29 and 30:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 31 and 32:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 33 and 34:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 35:
Exchange rate volatility and the mi
- Page 38 and 39:
32 K. Bien et al. Although economet
- Page 40 and 41:
34 K. Bien et al. 2.1 Copula functi
- Page 42 and 43:
36 K. Bien et al. and x k t ≡ (xk
- Page 44 and 45: 38 K. Bien et al. Fig. 3 Multivaria
- Page 46 and 47: 40 K. Bien et al. Bivariate model s
- Page 48 and 49: 42 K. Bien et al. deviation 0.0099,
- Page 50 and 51: 44 K. Bien et al. - Set ˆzt = Âxt
- Page 52 and 53: 46 K. Bien et al. % Frequency −0.
- Page 54 and 55: 48 K. Bien et al. References Amilon
- Page 56 and 57: 50 1 Introduction A. Escribano and
- Page 58 and 59: 52 A. Escribano and R. Pascual Jang
- Page 60 and 61: 54 A. Escribano and R. Pascual the
- Page 62 and 63: 56 The generating processes of mark
- Page 64 and 65: 58 with AtðLÞ ¼ 0 B @ 1 ð ÞAab
- Page 66 and 67: 60 A. Escribano and R. Pascual cros
- Page 68 and 69: 62 Hasbrouck (1991). The system is
- Page 70 and 71: 64 unitary seller-initiated shock (
- Page 72 and 73: 66 6.1 Estimation of the baseline m
- Page 74 and 75: Table 2 The base-line VEC model for
- Page 76 and 77: 70 Table 3 Simulation of the base-l
- Page 78 and 79: 72 revert towards narrow levels. As
- Page 80 and 81: Table 5 Impulse-response functions
- Page 82 and 83: 76 We also show that NYSE buyer-ini
- Page 84 and 85: 78 As 0 < a m < 1; L ð Þ ¼ 1 a m
- Page 86 and 87: 80 NYSE 2000 Stocks AOL America Onl
- Page 88 and 89: 82 A. Escribano and R. Pascual Madh
- Page 90 and 91: 84 1 Introduction S. Frey, J. Gramm
- Page 92 and 93: 86 develops the empirical methodolo
- Page 96 and 97: 90 comparability across stocks, we
- Page 98 and 99: 92 subtracting the deviations from
- Page 100 and 101: 94 market order distribution that c
- Page 102 and 103: 96 Table 2 First stage GMM results
- Page 104 and 105: Table 4 First stage GMM results bas
- Page 106 and 107: 100 S. Frey, J. Grammig quotes on e
- Page 108 and 109: 102 S. Frey, J. Grammig approximate
- Page 110 and 111: 104 To obtain the estimates in the
- Page 112 and 113: 106 Hence, using the liquidity stat
- Page 114 and 115: 108 In the main text we discuss the
- Page 117 and 118: Pierre Giot . Joachim Grammig How l
- Page 119 and 120: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 121 and 122: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 123 and 124: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 125 and 126: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 127 and 128: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 129 and 130: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 131 and 132: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 133 and 134: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 135 and 136: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 137: How large is liquidity risk in an a
- Page 140 and 141: 134 A. D. Hall, N. Hautsch In this
- Page 142 and 143: 136 includes order book variables,
- Page 144 and 145:
138 An important determinant of liq
- Page 146 and 147:
140 The innovation term ei is compu
- Page 148 and 149:
Table 1 Order book characteristics
- Page 150 and 151:
144 data covering the normal tradin
- Page 152 and 153:
146 Table 3 Descriptive statistics
- Page 154 and 155:
Table 4 Fully specified ACI models
- Page 156 and 157:
Table 4 (continued) BHP NAB NCP TLS
- Page 158 and 159:
Table 5 ACI models without dynamics
- Page 160 and 161:
Table 5 (continued) BHP NAB NCP TLS
- Page 162 and 163:
Table 6 ACI models without covariat
- Page 164 and 165:
Table 6 (continued) BHP NAB NCP TLS
- Page 166 and 167:
160 specification which includes or
- Page 168 and 169:
162 5.2.5 The impact of the bid-ask
- Page 170 and 171:
164 contrast to those of Pascual an
- Page 173 and 174:
Roman Liesenfeld . Ingmar Nolte . W
- Page 175 and 176:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 177 and 178:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 179 and 180:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 181 and 182:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 183 and 184:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 185 and 186:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 187 and 188:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 189 and 190:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 191 and 192:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 193 and 194:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 195 and 196:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 197 and 198:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 199 and 200:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 201 and 202:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 203:
Modelling financial transaction pri
- Page 206 and 207:
200 W. B. Omrane, H. V. Oppens anal
- Page 208 and 209:
202 W. B. Omrane, H. V. Oppens of s
- Page 210 and 211:
204 The extrema detection method ba
- Page 212 and 213:
206 price 0.8565 0.8575 0.8585 0.85
- Page 214 and 215:
208 We distinguish three possible c
- Page 216 and 217:
210 originates. The most active tra
- Page 218 and 219:
212 Table 2 Predictability of the c
- Page 220 and 221:
214 6 Conclusion Using 5-min euro/d
- Page 222 and 223:
216 where σk is the standard devia
- Page 224 and 225:
218 If we meet a particular case su
- Page 226 and 227:
220 C.5. Triple bottom (TB) TB is c
- Page 228 and 229:
222 References W. B. Omrane, H. V.
- Page 231 and 232:
Juan M. Rodríguez-Poo · David Ver
- Page 233 and 234:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 235 and 236:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 237 and 238:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 239 and 240:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 241 and 242:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 243 and 244:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 245 and 246:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 247 and 248:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 249 and 250:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 251 and 252:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 253 and 254:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 255 and 256:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 257:
Semiparametric estimation for finan
- Page 260 and 261:
254 between price changes and durat
- Page 262 and 263:
256 simply aggregated. Even after a
- Page 264 and 265:
258 is to make use of the fact that
- Page 266 and 267:
260 together with the restrictions
- Page 268 and 269:
Table 3 Estimated probabilities of
- Page 270 and 271:
264 A. S. Tay, C. Ting More interes
- Page 272 and 273:
Table 4 Estimated probabilities of
- Page 274 and 275:
268 Acknowledgements Tay gratefully
- Page 276 and 277:
270 This paper explores the effect
- Page 278 and 279:
272 contrast, price responses to po
- Page 280 and 281:
274 Fig. 1 Continuous line is the T
- Page 282 and 283:
276 the β’s can form a convex sh
- Page 284 and 285:
278 fixing some intervals around th
- Page 286 and 287:
280 . That is for a given absolute
- Page 288 and 289:
282 30 25 20 15 10 5 CC UNEMW ISM U
- Page 290 and 291:
Appendix Table A1 Consumer confiden
- Page 292 and 293:
Table A3 Non-farm payrolls • ✓
- Page 294 and 295:
Table A5 Weekly unemployment claims
- Page 296 and 297:
290 Table A8 Retail sales • ✓ 1
- Page 298 and 299:
292 Table A12 GDP, BI, TB and PI Re
- Page 300 and 301:
294 V. Voev with the problem of how
- Page 302 and 303:
296 V. Voev 2.1 A sample covariance
- Page 304 and 305:
298 V. Voev Using the equicorrelate
- Page 306 and 307:
300 V. Voev where �kl(t) is the (
- Page 308 and 309:
302 V. Voev where hkl,k ′ l ′ i
- Page 310 and 311:
304 V. Voev is 1.9%. From the daily
- Page 312 and 313:
306 V. Voev ACF ACF ACF 0.5 0.5 0.5
- Page 314 and 315:
308 V. Voev autocorrelated. Indeed,
- Page 316 and 317:
310 V. Voev 5 Conclusion Table 2 Ro
- Page 318:
312 V. Voev Engle R (1982) Autoregr