20.11.2012 Views

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

recent developments in high frequency financial ... - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

296 V. Voev<br />

2.1 A sample covariance forecast<br />

In this section we describe a forecast<strong>in</strong>g strategy based on the sample covariance<br />

matrix, which will serve as a benchmark. The sample covariance is a consistent<br />

estimator for the true population covariance under weak assumptions. We use a<br />

roll<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>dow scheme and def<strong>in</strong>e the forecast as<br />

ˆ� (s) 1<br />

t+1|t =<br />

T<br />

t�<br />

s=t−T +1<br />

(rs − ¯rt,T)(rs − ¯rt,T) ′ , (2)<br />

where for each t, ¯rt,T is the sample mean <strong>of</strong> the return vector r over the last T<br />

observations. We will denote the sample covariance matrix at time t by �SC t . For<br />

T we choose a value <strong>of</strong> 60, which with monthly data corresponds to a time span <strong>of</strong><br />

5 years. As the near future is <strong>of</strong> the <strong>high</strong>est importance <strong>in</strong> volatility forecast<strong>in</strong>g, this<br />

number might seem too large. Too small a number <strong>of</strong> periods, however, would lead<br />

to a large variance <strong>of</strong> the estimator; therefore other authors (e.g. Ledoit and Wolf<br />

(2004)) have also chosen 60 months as a balance between precision and relevance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the data. A problem <strong>of</strong> this approach, as simple as it is, is that new <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />

given the same weight as very old <strong>in</strong>formation.Another obvious oversimplification<br />

is that we do not account for the serial dependence present <strong>in</strong> the second moments<br />

<strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial returns.<br />

2.2 A shr<strong>in</strong>kage sample covariance forecast<br />

In this section we briefly present the shr<strong>in</strong>kage estimator, proposed by Ledoit and<br />

Wolf (2003), <strong>in</strong> order to give an idea <strong>of</strong> the shr<strong>in</strong>kage pr<strong>in</strong>ciple.<br />

The shr<strong>in</strong>kage estimator <strong>of</strong> the covariance matrix �t is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a weighted<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> some shr<strong>in</strong>kage target Ft and the sample covariance matrix,<br />

where the weights are chosen <strong>in</strong> an optimal way. More formally, the estimator is<br />

given by<br />

� SS<br />

t =ˆα∗ t Ft + (1 −ˆα ∗ t )�SC<br />

t , (3)<br />

ˆα ∗ t ∈[0, 1] is an estimate <strong>of</strong> the optimal shr<strong>in</strong>kage constant α∗ t .<br />

The shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity is chosen to be optimal with respect to a loss function<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed as a quadratic distance between the true and the estimated covariance<br />

matrices based on the Frobenius norm. The Frobenius norm <strong>of</strong> an N×N symmetric<br />

matrix Z with elements (zij)i,j=1,...,N is def<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

�Z� 2 =<br />

N�<br />

N�<br />

i=1 j=1<br />

z 2 ij . (4)<br />

The quadratic loss function is the Frobenius norm <strong>of</strong> the difference between �SS t<br />

and the true covariance matrix:<br />

�<br />

�<br />

L(αt) = �αtFt + (1 − αt)� SC<br />

�<br />

�<br />

t − �t�<br />

2<br />

. (5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!