24.11.2012 Views

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. Microshutter History <strong>of</strong> Risk in Testing<br />

The Microshutters are a brand new technology that was created for the NIRSpec<br />

instrument on the JWST. This technology provides the most precise in space<br />

spectroscopy to date. The Microshutters are an array <strong>of</strong> individual micron scale cells<br />

with lids that open and close with a magnetic field in order to survey the spectra <strong>of</strong> 100<br />

objects at a time as well as block out the other portions in space.<br />

The Microshutter Assembly (MSA) is the enclosure for the array that must be<br />

flight certified for shock. The Microshutters are new technology with no flight heritage<br />

and because <strong>of</strong> this it was determined that the MSA be tested for shock certification.<br />

Similar to the FPAs, the MSA is on the Science Instrument (SI) level <strong>of</strong> the ISIM. The<br />

MSA was shocked to the SI specification. The Microshutters failed their initial testing as<br />

the array was severely fractured. This failure had several costly repercussions. Broken<br />

hardware, the need for more testing and a delay in the project schedule were the results.<br />

It was confirmed that the testing did not simulate the shock that the MSA will really<br />

encounter. The predicted levels <strong>of</strong> the shock that were given for the MSA were much<br />

higher than they should have been. Since the initial failure <strong>of</strong> the MSA, more precise and<br />

expensive tests were done at facilities in Europe and the U.S. until the MSA could finally<br />

be qualified for shock. The entire ordeal <strong>of</strong> qualifying the MSA demonstrates the risks <strong>of</strong><br />

direct testing <strong>of</strong> shock for structures at the SI level.<br />

The Microshutter Assembly (MSA) Individual microscopic shutters<br />

C. Testing deferral to Observatory level<br />

From previous examples, there is a definite risk for shock testing at the SI level.<br />

To avoid this, testing can be deferred to the next larger level. The observatory level is the<br />

next level for shock testing the FPAs and the decision to defer shock testing for FPAs is<br />

based on an assessment <strong>of</strong> the strength and robustness <strong>of</strong> the assembly. Dominant<br />

assembly resonance is one area <strong>of</strong> consideration for the sturdiness <strong>of</strong> a structure. A Jet<br />

Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), analysis <strong>of</strong> the predicted shock on the FPMs for MIRI<br />

(Focal Plane Module and Focal Plane Assembly are synonyms), from the MIRI<br />

Requirements Document (JWST-IRD-000782 Revision K), showed that the response <strong>of</strong><br />

the FPM and the internal detector assembly, were not sensitive to the shock levels given<br />

from the Observatory Base requirements Document (JWST OBA RD). As a result, JPL<br />

concluded that a SI level shock test <strong>of</strong> the FPM was not necessary and that shock testing<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!