Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

More documents

Recommendations

Info

For information about the programs of the Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium, contact the Program Office or any of the following individuals: Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium University of Wisconsin-Green Bay 2420 Nicolet Drive Green Bay, WI 54311-7001 Tel: (920)465-2108; Fax: (920)465-2376 www.uwgb.edu/wsgc Director R. Aileen Yingst University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (920)465-2327; yingsta@uwgb.edu Program Manager/Associate Director for Outreach Sharon D. Brandt University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (920)465-2941; brandts@uwgb.edu Chair, WSGC Advisory Council and Institutional Representative Karen Valley Wisconsin Department of Transportation (608)266-8166; karen.valley@dot.state.wi.us WSGC Associate Director for Scholarships/Fellowships Steven Dutch University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (920)465-2246; dutchs@uwgb.edu WSGC Associate Director for Student Satellite Programs William Farrow Milwaukee School of Engineering (414)277-2241; farroww@msoe.edu WSGC Associate Director for Research Infrastructure Gubbi R. Sudhakaran University of Wisconsin-La Crosse (608)785-8431; sudhakar.gubb@uwlax.edu WSGC Associate Director for Higher Education John Borg Marquette University (414)288-7519; john.borg@marquette.edu WSGC Associate Director for Special Initiatives Thomas Bray Milwaukee School of Engineering (414)277-7416; brayt@msoe.edu WSGC Associate Director for Industry Program Eric Rice Orbital Technologies Corporation (608)827-5000; ricee@orbitec.com
THE CASSINI ENCOUNTER WITH THE GEM OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM 19 th Annual Wisconsin Space Conference August 13-14, 2009 Host: Milwaukee School of Engineering Milwaukee, Wisconsin Edited by: R. Aileen Yingst, Director, Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium Sharon D. Brandt, Program Manager, Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium Martin Rudd, Assistant Professor of Chemistry, UW-Fox Valley Nadejda Kaltcheva, Department of Physics & Astronomy, UW-Oshkosh Cover by: Jonathan Carlson, Student Assistant, Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium Layout by: Sue Weiler, Office Coordinator, Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium Published by: Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium University of Wisconsin-Green Bay
Page 1: Space Grant Consortium wisconsin UN
Page 5: Th he proceedinngs of our 199th Ann
Page 8 and 9: Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium Un
Page 10 and 11: Part 3: NASA Reduced Gravity Progra
Page 12 and 13: EAA Women Soar - You Soar, Lee Siud
Page 15 and 16: Elijah High Altitude Balloon Projec
Page 17 and 18: Our experience with the HALO II lau
Page 19 and 20: which had been a problem in the pas
Page 21: Figure 6: 3-D GPS Generated Track o
Page 24 and 25: Results The seeds tested in the lab
Page 26 and 27: hour as we assumed the flight in th
Page 28 and 29: Experimental Results There are two
Page 30 and 31: A series of tests were done in a co
Page 32 and 33: 380 360 340 320 23.3 Temp. (Celsius
Page 35 and 36: First Place, Non-Engineering: Schmi
Page 37 and 38: of the basis for fin designs came f
Page 39 and 40: ejection charge from the motor fire
Page 41 and 42: using rip-stop nylon cloth. To atta
Page 43 and 44: Post-flight recovery. A field searc
Page 45 and 46: Thus, it is believed that the main
Page 47: [2] Public Missiles Ltd. Frequently
Page 50 and 51: Design Features The chief requireme
Page 52 and 53:
The joint between the dart and the
Page 54 and 55:
Area dramatically influenced by flo
Page 56 and 57:
Altitude [ft] 6000 5000 4000 3000 2
Page 58 and 59:
though a strong crosswind was prese
Page 60 and 61:
Our Design Our rocket uses the basi
Page 62 and 63:
e easily recovered. Bong recreation
Page 64 and 65:
Performance Characteristics of Pred
Page 67 and 68:
Background and Context: Student Roc
Page 69 and 70:
The Rocky Mountain Miners’ compet
Page 71:
19th Annual Conference Part Three N
Page 74 and 75:
The angle of repose of a granular m
Page 76 and 77:
Experiment Design The experiment co
Page 78 and 79:
on the ground and in the Weightless
Page 80 and 81:
measurements for the 1 − g data.
Page 82 and 83:
[ImageJ, 2008] Image Analysis Softw
Page 85 and 86:
Dynamics Characterization of the El
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 1 - A calibration equation f
Page 89 and 90:
Wire A secondary investigation into
Page 91:
[1] Taminger, K. M. B.; and Hafley,
Page 94 and 95:
Introduction The analysis of wake v
Page 96 and 97:
Figure 2: Screen I mage o f G UI. T
Page 98 and 99:
References ¹ Burnham, D.C., and Ha
Page 101 and 102:
Validation of Novel Rigid Body Fric
Page 103 and 104:
forces is implemented in the popula
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 2. CAD representation of a t
Page 107 and 108:
Results Figure 5. Assembled hydraul
Page 109:
References Anitescu, M. (2006). "Op
Page 112 and 113:
Multi-stage Joule-Thomson cycles ar
Page 114 and 115:
significant change in total compres
Page 116 and 117:
The enthalpy (h3) of the 2 nd stage
Page 118 and 119:
UA m� ⎛ ε −1 ⎞ ( c nd c st
Page 120 and 121:
educed, the temperature range that
Page 122 and 123:
7. Lemmon, E. W.; Huber, M. L.; McL
Page 124 and 125:
Throughout each of the run cycles,
Page 126 and 127:
and heater adjusted to accommodate
Page 129 and 130:
Phaeton Mast Dynamics Mechanical Sy
Page 131 and 132:
exposure to the FEMAP with NASTRAN
Page 133 and 134:
The irregularity in the plots above
Page 135 and 136:
inversion of a particular matrix, t
Page 137:
clarified. Additionally, the PMD ki
Page 140 and 141:
A. Abstract For hardware to be flig
Page 142 and 143:
should be performed at the JWST obs
Page 144 and 145:
B. Attenuation and Uncertainty Shoc
Page 146 and 147:
Detector Array and ROIC SCA Mount L
Page 148 and 149:
Detector Shock Environment The leve
Page 150 and 151:
Orbiter (MRO), Moon Mineralogy Mapp
Page 152 and 153:
4. NASA JPL. MIRI FOCAL PLANE SYSTE
Page 155 and 156:
Is Lake Superior a significant sour
Page 157 and 158:
each grid cell at daily resolution.
Page 159 and 160:
Figure 3. (a) Seasonal cycle of lak
Page 161 and 162:
Figure 5. Model pCO2 at the surface
Page 163:
Marshall, J., A. Adcroft, C. Hill,
Page 166 and 167:
numerical weather prediction (NWP)
Page 168 and 169:
High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR)
Page 170 and 171:
On the morning of 26 May 2008, ther
Page 172 and 173:
References Behnke, C., 2005: Synopt
Page 174 and 175:
Figure 3 Figure 3 contains base ref
Page 177 and 178:
A Comparative Study of Type IIb Sup
Page 179 and 180:
Fig. 3.— Cartoon Image of SN blas
Page 181 and 182:
Fig. 4.— Light curve of SN 2008bo
Page 183:
type IIn Supernova SN 1995N,” 200
Page 190:
and then can spiral in to the black
Page 195 and 196:
Understanding the Evolution of Supe
Page 197 and 198:
Radio  measurements  of  supe
Page 199 and 200:
In the equations on the p
Page 201 and 202:
SN 2008ax in NGC 4490 SN2008ax is a
Page 203:
References Chevalier, R. A., “Int
Page 207 and 208:
Computational Fluid Dynamical Model
Page 209 and 210:
context of the k − ɛ model invol
Page 211 and 212:
Figure 3: Experimental results (•
Page 213 and 214:
direction results in the terminal s
Page 215:
121 (2000). [Blue Ridge Numerics, I
Page 218 and 219:
concentrated our effort specificall
Page 220 and 221:
density, and Ps is a pressure tenso
Page 222 and 223:
Properties of the GEM problem Recon
Page 224 and 225:
Figure 1: Increase in reconnection
Page 226 and 227:
Figure 3: Examples of agreement of
Page 229 and 230:
Reflection and Refraction of Vortex
Page 231 and 232:
Experimental Procedure The left han
Page 233 and 234:
frames in the upper left corner, wh
Page 235 and 236:
Vortex ring reflection. Similarly,
Page 237:
References L Bernal and J Kwon. Vor
Page 240 and 241:
group started in 1997 with the goal
Page 242 and 243:
I conducted five semi-structured in
Page 244 and 245:
In the example of the guinea pig pr
Page 246 and 247:
explain t his t rend. F rom t alkin
Page 248 and 249:
Research. Washington, DC: Pan Ameri
Page 250 and 251:
Our team has two goals: 1. To put S
Page 252 and 253:
fluctuating humidity, drying winds,
Page 254 and 255:
western border of the Arkansas Rive
Page 256 and 257:
adjusted to less than .4millisecond
Page 258 and 259:
Cacti Experiment 18 has produced 10
Page 260:
13. What N decomposer's are needed
Page 265 and 266:
Abstract Toxic Offgassing Analysis
Page 267 and 268:
The chambers were sealed and baked
Page 269 and 270:
Tables 4 and 5 show offgassing comp
Page 271:
there was no dichlorobenzene peak.
Page 274 and 275:
eneficiation reagents. Ionic liquid
Page 276 and 277:
Figure 3: Current versus voltage da
Page 279 and 280:
Abstract New Initiatives in the Pro
Page 281 and 282:
was noticed above the gel. A discol
Page 283 and 284:
delicate structures (hairs). N o fu
Page 285:
and A. Y. Rozanov, Eds., SPIE, Vol.
Page 289 and 290:
Combining Writing Across the Curric
Page 291 and 292:
But the study also reported a consi
Page 293 and 294:
Educators’ Aerospace Workshop for
Page 295 and 296:
2008-2009 Evaluation Educators’ A
Page 297:
Some comments from participants 200
Page 300 and 301:
The cost of a one credit graduate c
Page 303:
EAA WOMEN SOAR - YOU SOAR Dr. Lee J
Page 306 and 307:
� Incorporated the technology res
Page 308 and 309:
Evaluation Results: At the conclusi
Page 310 and 311:
Educational Standards: The National
Page 312 and 313:
curriculum development, to provide
Page 314 and 315:
and applications of GIS technology
Page 316 and 317:
• A significant new outcome for t
Page 318 and 319:
The design of this project and appl
Page 320 and 321:
Activities at the workshop involved
Page 322 and 323:
to give our students a series of PR
Page 324 and 325:
In the past we have not focused on
Page 327 and 328:
Providing High School Students with
Page 329 and 330:
that th e current generations of s
Page 331:
instruction a s pa rt o f t heir ow
Page 335 and 336:
Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium &
Page 337 and 338:
11:45-1:00 pm Lunch *** Concurrent
Page 339 and 340:
Moderator: David B lock, A ssociate
Page 341 and 342:
Second Place, E ngineering, Drew an
Page 343:
Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium
show all

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?