24.11.2012 Views

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 4. Chlorophyll estimated from SeaWiFS imagery (personal communication with Colleen Mouw) and model<br />

chlorophyll (mg Chl / m 3 ).<br />

Lake pCO2 and CO2 Flux. The difference in the partial pressures <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide between<br />

the atmosphere and the lake surface drive the air-lake CO2 gas exchange. The partial pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

CO2 (pCO2) has been directly measured only twice in Lake Superior. Direct measurements <strong>of</strong><br />

pCO2 indicate the lake is under-saturated and a sink <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide during the summer bloom.<br />

pCO2 is indirectly estimated by measuring lake pH and alkalinity. Measuring pH with an<br />

electrode has a significant bias (-0.13) in freshwater [French et al., 2001] that introduces an<br />

uncertainty in pCO2 up to hundreds <strong>of</strong> µatm (if bias is present, actual pCO2 would be<br />

significantly lower than shown) during summer. This can completely change the scientific<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> whether the lake is a sink or source <strong>of</strong> atmospheric CO2. To further complicate<br />

scientific understanding <strong>of</strong> the lake’s pCO2, the EPA measurements <strong>of</strong> pH are taken after the lake<br />

water is heated to 25 C. When estimating pCO2 from EPA measurements <strong>of</strong> pH and alkalinity,<br />

the pH must be corrected to the in situ temperature. The model pCO2 compares extremely well to<br />

directly measured pCO2 provided by M. Baehr (Figure 5). The model would not be expected to<br />

capture the extreme magnitude <strong>of</strong> the CO2 drawdown seen in the data, as the model is a 10km by<br />

10km region. The model pCO2 is also reasonable compared to indirect estimates <strong>of</strong> pCO2 from<br />

the nineteen stations visited by the EPA each year in April and August (Figure 5). Uncertainties<br />

<strong>of</strong> indirect pCO2 estimates are unknown, as the pH bias is unknown.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!