24.11.2012 Views

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

there was no dichlorobenzene peak. GC spectra confirmed that no dichlorobenzene could be<br />

found in the sample. Considering dichlorobenzene was present in both samples, a large peak<br />

was expected but not detected.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the challenges <strong>of</strong> this data was comparing effects <strong>of</strong> the sample and mix on peaks areas<br />

when the amount <strong>of</strong> Mix 4 used was different between chambers. Peak areas varied a lot simply<br />

due to the volume difference <strong>of</strong> Mix 4, making it difficult to analyze. Unfortunately by the time<br />

this was realized the solution <strong>of</strong> Mix 4 had been used up and there was no way to further analyze<br />

the interactions <strong>of</strong> the Mix and sample.<br />

Peak areas for <strong>of</strong>fgassing <strong>of</strong> 108148 were expected to decrease with decreasing temperature.<br />

This happened for the first two runs, and after that there was a general decreasing trend.<br />

However, different peaks increased and decreased at different points, suggesting the relationship<br />

was not that simple between peak area and temperature.<br />

Data from 107999 showed more identifiable <strong>of</strong>fgassing which was helped by using 15.0g <strong>of</strong><br />

sample as opposed to 5.0g. For the most part these results showed a more consistent decrease in<br />

peak area over time. For both 107999 and 108148 the peaks at 97 and 96 minutes had<br />

inconsistent areas for each column. The 107999 front peaks had small areas while the back<br />

column peaks had large areas. The opposite was true for 108148 which had large front column<br />

peak areas and small back column peak areas. While there is no clear explanation for why these<br />

peaks at about 96 minutes were inconsistent, the fact that it was observed in both samples<br />

suggested it was significant.<br />

Conclusion<br />

These experiments involved studying a variety <strong>of</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong> toxicity testing. Standard Mixes<br />

were used to look at response factors and detection limits <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> molecules. Mixes were<br />

also used to look at their interactions with materials, with limited success. Peak area dependence<br />

on temperature was investigated using material samples. Knowledge learned from these<br />

experiments served as part <strong>of</strong> continuous efforts to improve toxicity testing and the<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

References<br />

EM10-OWI-CHM-039, Revision B (Marshall <strong>Space</strong> Flight Center) “Determination <strong>of</strong> Offgassed<br />

Products Testing (Toxicity),” November 28, 2007.<br />

NASA-STD-6001 “Flammability, Odor, Offgassing, and Compatibility Requirements and Test<br />

Procedures for Materials in Environments that Support Combustion,” February 9, 1998.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!