24.11.2012 Views

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ejection charge from the motor fires. This was accomplished by hand sanding both the inside <strong>of</strong><br />

the body and the shoulders <strong>of</strong> the cone.<br />

Top and bottom <strong>of</strong> transition cone, prototyper machine<br />

Phenolic tubing was used for the body <strong>of</strong> the booster stage. For a rational as to why this was<br />

chosen please see the “Body” paragraph <strong>of</strong> section 2.2.2.<br />

The fins were custom built by Giant Leap Rocketry using G-10 fiberglass. The fins were beveled<br />

on both the leading and trailing edges in order to provide better aerodynamics. A thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

3/32” was used per recommendations by Giant Leap. 1/8” could have been used; however, a<br />

thicker material was used to err on the safer side. The fins were in the “clipped delta” shape as<br />

per recommendations by [1]. The G-10 fiberglass was chosen as the construction material<br />

because is has been widely used and tested in the HPR field. It is lighter and cheaper than almost<br />

any feasible metal to be used. Additionally, it can be easily epoxyed to the body <strong>of</strong> the rocket, as<br />

opposed to needing to weld or rivet metal fins. In the rare case that it would crack, it could also<br />

be repaired quickly and easily with epoxy.<br />

Custom G-10 fiberglass fins<br />

A custom tail-cone was purchased through Public Missiles Limited. The tail-cone, or boat-tail,<br />

that PMI sells happened to fit the rocket design perfectly. It was rough 12 inches long and went<br />

from a four inch diameter to a one and a half inch diameter. The only custom parts <strong>of</strong> the cone<br />

were the three slots that were cut for the fins to fit in. This was extremely helpful as there was<br />

much less work needed when trying to epoxy the fins in place and one could assume that they<br />

would be almost exactly straight.<br />

A combination <strong>of</strong> friction fitting and a simple screw and washer will hold the motor in place<br />

during ejection charge firing. The design for this was found in the motor retention device FAQ<br />

found here [2]. In order to increase the strength <strong>of</strong> the entire booster stage, the lower half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transition cone was filled with a two part expanding foam. This provided exceptional rigidity to<br />

the already strengthened lower section that was fortified with 30 minute epoxy. The surface <strong>of</strong><br />

the entire rocket was sanded down using 600 grit sand paper. Adding a paint coat to the rocket<br />

would only add extra unnecessary weight. Ultimately, the surface is still extremely smooth<br />

without a paint coating.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!