Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
Space Grant Consortium - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
I conducted five semi-structured interviews with some <strong>of</strong> the founders <strong>of</strong> Nueva Alborada<br />
in July and August <strong>of</strong> 2008. T he purpose <strong>of</strong> these interviews was to learn about the history <strong>of</strong><br />
Nueva Alborada, especially in the context <strong>of</strong> the establishment <strong>of</strong> triatomines in the area.<br />
Data Analysis<br />
Latitude and longitude coordinates <strong>of</strong> each house were determined using high-resolution<br />
aerial phot ographs f rom G oogleEarth (GoogleEarth, 2007) . I converted t he l atitude a nd<br />
longitude coordinates into the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate system (WGS<br />
84, Zone 19 South) to facilitate analysis in meters. I created shapefiles in ArcGIS 9.3 to spatially<br />
display the housing and animal types by household.<br />
Because there were many houses without the vector, the outcome variable <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />
bugs was not normally distributed. Although there were many small integers containing zeros in<br />
the out come, t he P oisson m odel w as n ot ap propriate b ecause t he m ean an d v ariance w ere n ot<br />
equal. S tatistical an alyses w ere co nducted i n t he s tatistical p ackage R ( R D evelopment C ore<br />
Team, 2008) . I used a two s tep a pproach i n a nalyzing t he da ta ba sed on t he a ssumption t hat<br />
there may be two different mechanisms at work: one mechanism that determined whether any<br />
triatomines were present or not, and one mechanism that determined how many triatomines were<br />
present a mong hous es w ith a non -zero num ber <strong>of</strong> t riatomines. F irst I performed uni variate<br />
logistic regressions using presence or absence <strong>of</strong> triatomines as the response, and the animal and<br />
housing type (again as presence/absence <strong>of</strong> that particular animal or housing type) as predictors.<br />
Then I ran a backward stepwise selection procedure starting with all predictors to select the best<br />
fitting model. T he f inal m odel w as c hosen us ing t he lowest Akaike’s Information Criterion<br />
(AIC). The second step was an analysis <strong>of</strong> just the houses with bugs using linear regression and<br />
backward stepwise selection on the logarithmically transformed non-zero outcome data. I also<br />
tested the correlations b etween al l predictors an d the in teractions b etween th e s ignificant<br />
predictors from the univariate regressions.<br />
I created semi-variograms <strong>of</strong> residuals to check for spatial autocorrelation in the residuals<br />
for all models. Some models showed evidence <strong>of</strong> spatial patterns in the data; to account for this I<br />
added a predictor variable measuring the distance from each house to the nearest house with 20<br />
or m ore i nsects. T his metric w as c alculated u sing th e D istance B etween P oints f unction in<br />
Hawth’s A nalysis T ools f or A rcGIS ( Beyer, 2004 ). I then r edid t he previously m entioned<br />
statistical tests including this predictor. In ArcGIS, I also tested Moran’s I Index and Ripley’s K<br />
Function t o t est f or s patial a utocorrelation a nd clustering, r espectively. Moran’s I Index i s a<br />
spatial statistic used to evaluate whether homes with bugs are clustered, dispersed, or random.<br />
Ripley’s K Function i s a nother w ay t o t est w hether t he hous es w ith bugs a re c lustered or<br />
dispersed but provides a simpler method for finding the distance to which a feature is clustered.<br />
It uses a multi-distance analysis to assess the observed clustering among infested households as<br />
compared to what would be expected in randomly distributed infested households.<br />
Results<br />
499 l ots w ere i n t he c ommunity <strong>of</strong> Nueva A lborada a t t he t ime <strong>of</strong> t he i nsecticide<br />
spraying. 452 households participated in the household sprayings; the remaining ones were not<br />
sprayed b ecause t he lots w ere e ither uni nhabited, t he ow ners w ere una vailable, or t he ow ners<br />
refused. O wner refusal accounted for only seven <strong>of</strong> the non-participating households and these<br />
homes were randomly distributed. In the community 4,111 total bugs were counted, which were<br />
distributed among 165 h ouses (37% <strong>of</strong> total). No bugs were infected with T. cruzi. Figure 3<br />
displays a map <strong>of</strong> the surveyed houses and triatomine presence in the community.<br />
14