11.07.2015 Views

View the meeting handbook - Linguistic Society of America

View the meeting handbook - Linguistic Society of America

View the meeting handbook - Linguistic Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

use experimental and corpus techniques to present evidence against a dependency representation <strong>of</strong> English NPs but consistent with ahierarchical representation. The stimuli are two PPs recursively embedded under an NP, versus two PPs embedded at <strong>the</strong> same levelunder an NP. A relative clause is attached to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NPs. The constructions have <strong>the</strong> same dependency structure but differenthierarchical phrase structures. The data show that priming <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> RC attachment height is sensitive to <strong>the</strong> hierarchical structure.Hooi Ling Soh (University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, Twin Cities/National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore) Session 28Transition types & <strong>the</strong> Mandarin Chinese particle -leI present evidence from Mandarin Chinese for three types <strong>of</strong> transition--transitions involving propositions (P-transition), eventualities(E-transition), and values along a scale (V-transition)--and claim that <strong>the</strong> actual transition type expressed is partially determined by <strong>the</strong>syntactic position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transition marker, <strong>the</strong> particle -le (cf. Huang & Davis 1989). The proposal <strong>of</strong>fers a new account for apersistent problem in <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> -le, namely <strong>the</strong> relation between <strong>the</strong> verb-final -le (verbal -le) and sentence final -le (sentential-le). I claim that sentential -le marks P-transition while verbal -le may mark E-transition or V-transition.Stephanie Solt (Graduate Center, City University <strong>of</strong> New York) Session 46A degree-based semantics for many & fewI draw on recent accounts <strong>of</strong> gradable adjectives (Kennedy 1999; Heim 2000, 2006) to propose a scalar analysis for many and few. Iargue that like adjectives such as tall, many and few can be decomposed into a gradable expression (Hackl 2000) and a null positivemorpheme that introduces a contextually determined neutral range on a given scale (von Stechow 2006). This not only capturesimportant similarities between many/few and pairs such as tall/short (particularly <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> an intermediate range where nei<strong>the</strong>rpositive nor negative term applies), but it also accounts for certain puzzles particular to many/few <strong>the</strong>mselves.Usama Soltan (Middlebury College) Session 51On <strong>the</strong> individual/property contrast in Egyptian Arabic free state possessive nominalsI provide data from Egyptian Arabic free state possessive nominals showing how individual-denoting possessives and propertydenotingpossessives differ in <strong>the</strong>ir syntactic behavior with regard to linear order, definiteness/specificity restrictions, distribution,relativization, possessivization, anaphora, and scopal ambiguity. To account for <strong>the</strong>se asymmetries, I argue, following Munn 1995and Strauss 2005, that both types <strong>of</strong> possessives occupy different syntactic positions within <strong>the</strong> structural hierarchy <strong>of</strong> DPs. Due tothis structural difference as well as a set <strong>of</strong> independently motivated principles <strong>of</strong> grammar, I provide a syntactic account for <strong>the</strong>seasymmetries.Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (California State University, Los Angeles/California State University, Northridge) Session 96The grammaticalization <strong>of</strong> dependent pronominal forms in Zoogocho ZapotecThe status <strong>of</strong> pronominal elements in Zapotec languages has been a topic <strong>of</strong> interest for over 80 years (see de Angulo 1926, Marlett1993). I discuss <strong>the</strong> particular status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dependent pronominal forms in San Bartolomé Zoogocho Zapotec. I use textual data and aquantitative examination <strong>of</strong> a corpus <strong>of</strong> almost 2000 clauses to argue that <strong>the</strong>se classes represent morphological classes in transition,and I point to <strong>the</strong> underlying discourse factors which lead to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> agreement affixes in agglutinating verb initiallanguages like Zoogocho Zapotec.Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (California State University, Los Angeles/California State University, Northridge) Session 96Michael Galant (California State University, Dominguez Hills)Functions & morphosyntactic reflexes <strong>of</strong> Proto-Zapotec *nV[-hi] in Sierra Norte Zapotec languagesThe Proto-Zapotec morpheme *nV[-hi], originally used as a conjunction 'and', a preposition 'with', or an adverb 'also, too', can befound incorporated, synchronically or diachronically, in various phonological forms in certain verb stems in modern varieties <strong>of</strong>Zapotec, with varying function from language to language. I compare <strong>the</strong> syntactic and semantic functions <strong>of</strong> this morpheme, as wellas <strong>the</strong> morphosyntactic reflexes <strong>of</strong> its presence, in Zapotec languages spoken in <strong>the</strong> Sierra Norte region <strong>of</strong> Oaxaca, building onprevious work done on <strong>the</strong>se languages (e.g. Galant, Sonnenschein, Foreman). This study contributes to our knowledge <strong>of</strong>comparative Zapotec syntax, argument structure, and semantic roles.Barbara Soukup (Georgetown University) Session 49On <strong>the</strong> strategic use <strong>of</strong> dialect in Austrian TV political discussionsInteraction-oriented approaches towards style-shifting and code-switching focus on communicative goals and outcomes as driving164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!